A Stunning Discovery by US Media: Fewer Chinese Students Are Coming to America, While Chinese-American Professors Are Leaving

A Stunning Discovery by US Media: Fewer Chinese Students Are Coming to America, While Chinese-American Professors Are Leaving 美媒的一個驚人發現:來美中國留學生少了,同一時間,美國華人教授走了……

2025年11月17日,美國《門戶開放報告》最新一期出來了。美國高校招生辦看完直接傻眼:中國在美本科生,現在只剩78,583人,幾年前可是15萬。

全美國際學生創了117萬的新高,印度人衝到36萬,把中國保持了15年的第一名給擠了。全世界學生還在往美國跑,偏偏中國孩子不去了。那些靠中國學費養了十幾年的二三線大學,宿舍空了,班都開不齊了。人為什麼去不了?簽證就是頭一道鐵門。

《第一刀 簽證卡殼》

2025年5月28日,美國國務院發聲明要嚴查中國留學生。國務卿魯比奧當天就在社交媒體上喊話:狠狠吊銷中國學生的簽證。

什麼叫敏感領域?沒說。整個理工科都可能算,誰也不知道自己哪天踩了線。緊接着簽證又收緊了,14歲以下80歲以上都得去面簽。

敏感專業的學生更慘,有效期壓到3個月,辦一次拖上半年。有孩子暑假回國探個親,就再也回不去了。課都開了,人還在國內乾等着。就問你急不急?

《第二刀 教授被抄》

學生不來了,講台上的華人教授也在撤。2025年3月出了件事,美國學術圈炸了鍋。

印第安納大學計算機系有個王曉峰教授,在學校幹了二十年。一天FBI突然搜了他家,校方接着就出手了:沒起訴、沒定罪,把王曉峰和他同樣在學校的妻子,直接解聘了。

校規規定的提前十天通知、校內聽證會全跳過了。校方就一句:去問FBI。

他妻子馬念莉說每天醒來都以為是一場噩夢,在這所大學付出了二十年青春,連個為什麼都沒等到。

這事傳開后全美華裔學者後背發涼。麻省理工教授陳剛2021年也被抓過,關了近一年才證明清白。他說想起那天被帶走的時候,氣得渾身發抖,就兩個字,噁心。

《第三刀 數據明牌》

不是一兩個人的感覺。普林斯頓大學教授謝宇做了個追蹤研究,覆蓋兩萬多家機構。

2010到2021年,每年離開美國的華裔科學家從900人漲到了2600多人,翻了兩番。這些人去哪了?2010年48%回中國大陸和香港,到2021年變成67%。

謝宇團隊還問卷了1304名有終身教職的華裔科學家:72%的人做研究感到不安全,86%的人說現在招頂級學生比五年前難太多了。這三個數字擺出來,意思就一個——環境不行了,人待不住了。

《第四刀 用腳投票》

2024年1月,力學界頂級專家高華健全職回了清華,七院院士,拿過國際固體力學最高獎。

年底美國醫學科學院院士王存玉離開加州大學洛杉磯分校,去北大當了院長,說回母校是榮幸也是責任。

2025年初,核物理學家劉暢離開普林斯頓去了北大物理學院。數學家林華新在美國待了近40年回了上海。計算機科學家陳婧離開美國去了清華。

媒體盤了一下,2024年以來至少17名頂尖科學家從海外回國,75%以上是從美國回來的。

《自然》雜誌2025年3月做了個調查,1600多名美國科研人員里,超過1200人在考慮離開,比例高達75%,原因就是政府砍經費、大把人被裁。

哈佛費正清中心前主任墨菲早警告過,說美國正在失去整整一代了解中國的人。數學家丘成桐說得更直接:這些科學家除了離開別無選擇。

美國一百年靠全世界的聰明腦袋撐起來的,現在簽證掐死了,華人查緊了,錢也砍了,那些人憑什麼還留着?數據已經把趨勢寫得明明白白,接下來還會發生什麼,時間會給答案。

November 17, 2025 — The latest edition of the U.S. Open Doors Report was released. Admissions offices at American universities were stunned: there are now only 78,583 Chinese undergraduates in the U.S., down from 150,000 just a few years ago.

The total number of international students in the U.S. hit a new high of 1.17 million, with Indian students surging to 360,000 and displacing China from the top spot it had held for 15 years. Students from all over the world are still flocking to America — but Chinese students are staying away. For second- and third-tier universities that have relied on Chinese tuition for over a decade, dormitories are empty and classes can’t even be filled. Why can’t they come? Visas are the first iron gate.

Blow 1: Visa Hangups

On May 28, 2025, the U.S. State Department issued a statement vowing to scrutinize Chinese students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio took to social media the same day, declaring: “Vigorously revoke Chinese students’ visas.”

What counts as a “sensitive field”? No one knows. The entire STEM spectrum could be included, and no one knows when they might cross the line. Soon after, visa rules tightened further — even applicants under 14 and over 80 were required to appear for in-person interviews.

Students in sensitive majors fared even worse: their visa validity was slashed to three months, and each application dragged on for six months. Some students who went home to China for summer vacation never made it back. Classes had already started, but they were still stuck waiting in China. Can you feel the urgency?

Blow 2: Professors Raided

Students aren’t coming, and Chinese professors on the podium are also leaving. In March 2025, something happened that sent shockwaves through U.S. academia.

Professor Wang Xiaofeng, a computer science faculty member at Indiana University who had worked there for two decades, had his home suddenly raided by the FBI. The university then moved swiftly: without charges or a conviction, they terminated both Wang and his wife, who also worked at the school.

The university skipped the required ten-day notice and on-campus hearing, offering only one explanation: “Ask the FBI.”

His wife, Ma Nianli, said she wakes up every day hoping it’s a nightmare — having given twenty years of her youth to the university, without even a reason why.

Word spread, and Chinese-American scholars across the country felt a chill down their spines. MIT professor Chen Gang, who was arrested in 2021 and spent nearly a year in detention before being exonerated, said he still trembles with anger when recalling the day he was taken away. His verdict: two words — disgusting.

Blow 3: Data Tells the Story

It’s not just a handful of people’s feelings. Princeton professor Xie Yu conducted a longitudinal study covering more than 20,000 institutions.

From 2010 to 2021, the number of Chinese-American scientists leaving the U.S. each year grew from 900 to over 2,600 — quadrupling. Where did they go? In 2010, 48% returned to mainland China and Hong Kong; by 2021, that figure had risen to 67%.

Xie’s team also surveyed 1,304 tenured Chinese-American scientists: 72% felt unsafe conducting research in the U.S., and 86% said it is now much harder to recruit top-tier students than five years ago. Put these three numbers together, and the message is clear — the environment is no longer viable, and people are no longer staying.

Blow 4: Voting with Their Feet

In January 2024, Gao Huajian, a top expert in mechanics and a seven-academy academician who had won the highest international award in solid mechanics, returned to Tsinghua University full-time.

At the end of the year, Wang Cunyu, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Medicine, left UCLA to become dean at Peking University, calling his return to his alma mater “both an honor and a responsibility.”

In early 2025, nuclear physicist Liu Chang left Princeton for Peking University’s School of Physics. Mathematician Lin Huaxin, who had spent nearly 40 years in the U.S., returned to Shanghai. Computer scientist Chen Jing left the U.S. for Tsinghua.

The media tallied it up: since 2024, at least 17 top scientists have returned from overseas, over 75% of them from the U.S.

In March 2025, Nature conducted a survey of more than 1,600 U.S. researchers — over 1,200 were considering leaving, a staggering 75%, citing government funding cuts and mass layoffs.

Ezra Vogel, former director of Harvard’s Fairbank Center, had warned early on that America was losing an entire generation of people who understand China. Mathematician Shing-Tung Yau put it more bluntly: “These scientists have no choice but to leave.”

For a century, America has been sustained by brilliant minds from around the world. Now visas are choked off, Chinese scholars are being closely scrutinized, and funding is slashed — why would they stay? The data already spells out the trend in black and white. What happens next? Time will tell.

THE US CAUSED THE COVID PANDEMIC, not China, the US government revealed today.

THE US CAUSED THE COVID PANDEMIC, not China, the US government revealed today. 美國造成了COVID疫情,而非中國——美國政府今日揭露此事。

「是時候讓美國人民知道真實故事了。」情報首長圖爾西·加巴德(Tulsi Gabbard)在X平台上發布的一則引發轟動的影片及網路聲明中如此表示。

而這故事,可真是非同小可。

真相終於大白
美國花費數百萬美元資助中國武漢的一間實驗室,進行致命病毒的實驗。

該研究涉及一種稱為「功能增益」(gain of function)的技術,部分人士認為這等同於將病毒武器化。

「該研究如今被廣泛視為引發疫情的非蓄意實驗室洩漏源頭。」國家情報總監加巴德表示。

「這項危險的研究造成了難以估量的傷害及無數生命的損失。」她補充道。

官方偏好敘事
疫情爆發後,華盛頓當局極力向世界宣稱,這不可能是實驗室洩漏。

當時流傳的主流說法是,病毒是由於中國當地的環境條件,經由動物傳播給人類而演變而成。

但美國情報首長表示,證據顯示的是另一個故事。她在今日——其任期最後一天——發布了一批新的機密文件。

120座生物實驗室
故事始於美國悄悄在超過30個國家設立了120座生物實驗室。她表示,其中部分實驗室涉及危險病原體的研究。

她指出,安東尼·佛奇(Dr. Anthony Fauci)博士在擔任國家過敏與傳染病研究所(National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases)所長期間,將數百萬美元的美國納稅人資金,用於武漢病毒研究所的蝙蝠冠狀病毒研究。

2019年,COVID-19病毒似乎在全球多處地點同時浮現——但首先被科學家正式檢測到的,是2019年底在中國武漢。

該病毒很快就在全球被發現。加巴德表示:「這場疫情為數百萬人帶來了巨大的苦難與痛苦。」

官方偏好敘事
對美國而言,官方偏好的說法是:這「不是」實驗室洩漏——因為世界會意識到,五角大廈正在資助全球各地及美國本土的生物實驗室。

那些對生物實驗室提出警示的人,被指控為「散布俄羅斯與中國的假訊息」。

當實驗室的存在已無法否認時,BBC及其他媒體報導稱,這些是「和平實驗室」,其資助完全基於正面理由——此說法讓密切關注五角大廈的人士難以接受。

隱瞞與情報機構的關聯
加巴德表示,佛奇在疫情初期與高級情報人員合作塑造敘事,卻對此謊稱不知情。

在2024年眾議院新冠病毒疫情特別小組委員會(House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic)的證詞中,他被在宣誓下詢問:在疫情之前、期間或之後,是否曾就病毒研究與情報機構進行溝通。

佛奇回答:「就我所知,沒有,關於COVID方面。」

2025年1月,許多人對前總統喬·拜登(Joe Biden)向佛奇發布「預防性赦免」感到困惑。赦免的定義是針對違法者——但當時此情況並未發生。

巨大的苦難
加巴德即將退休,以陪伴她罹患癌症的丈夫。

但她希望在隱退之前,將此議題的真相公諸於世。她表示,證據顯示美國資助的研究是問題的根源。

「COVID-19疫情為數百萬美國同胞及全球無數人民帶來了巨大的苦難與痛苦。」她說。

“It’s time the American people learn the real story,” spy chief Tulsi Gabbard in a sensation-causing video released on X and a statement on the internet.

And what a story it is.

TRUTH AT LAST
The US spent millions to finance a lab in China’s Wuhan to experiment on killer viruses.

The research was on a technique called “gain of function” which some people see as weaponization of the viruses.

That research is “now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic,” said Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence.

“This dangerous research caused immeasurable harm and countless lost lives,” she added.

PREFERRED NARRATIVE
After the pandemic broke out, Washington then worked to tell the world it could not have been a lab leak.

The preferred story circulating at the time was to say that animal-to-human transmission evolved in China due to the circumstances there.

But the evidence tells a different tale, the US spy chief said, releasing a new batch of top secret documents today, her last day in office.

120 BIOLABS

The story begins with the US quietly setting up 120 biological laboratories across more than 30 countries. Some of these laboratories were involved in research on hazardous pathogens, she said.

Dr Anthony Fauci, while serving as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, sent millions of dollars of US taxpayer cash to be spent on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, she said.

In 2019, the Covid-19 virus apparently emerged in several locations around the world—but was first formally detected by scientists in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019.

It was soon found all over the world. The “pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions,” Gabbard said.

PREFERRED NARRATIVE
For the US, the preferred story was that it was NOT a lab leak—because the world would realize that the Pentagon was financing biolabs around the world, and at home.

People raising the alarm about the biolabs were accused of “pushing Russian and Chinese disinformation”.

When the existence of the labs could not be denied, the BBC and other media reported that they were “peaceful labs” which were financed for entirely positive reasons—a line that Pentagon-watchers found hard to swallow.

LIED ABOUT INTELLIGENCE CONNECTION
Fauci worked with senior intelligence agents in the early days of the pandemic to shape the narrative but lied about it, Gabbard said.

In his testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in 2024, he was asked under oath whether he had communicated with intelligence agencies concerning viral research before, during or after the pandemic.

Fauci replied: “Not to my knowledge, about COVID.”

In January 2025, many people were puzzled when Former President Joe Biden issued “a pre-emptive pardon” to Fauci. Pardons, by definition, are given to people who have broken the law—but this had not happened at that time.

TREMENDOUS HARDSHIP
Gabbard is retiring to spend more time with her husband, who has cancer.

But she wanted to get the truth about this subject out there before she disappeared. She says the evidence indicates US-funded research was the root of the problem.

“The COVID-19 pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and for countless people around the world,” she said.

Video: My wife Carmen hosted a special dinner with friends in San Francisco

Video: My wife Carmen hosted a special dinner with friends in San Francisco 我的太太在舊金山做東與朋友們舉辦了一場特別的晚宴。
https://rumble.com/v7bic8e-my-wife-carmen-hosted-a-special-dinner-with-friends-in-san-francisco.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8sscuW3/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02ZiL4DRPkDSNPR7bkfiL46mS4RgxZVk1RjitzACoxMykvrZVj66LBxHWAZefoK8Qyl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

A 25-Year American Dream, Undone. By Johnson Choi. June 18 2026

A 25-Year American Dream, Undone. By Johnson Choi. June 18 2026 一場歷時二十五年的美國夢,就此幻滅. 作者: 蔡永強. 2026年6月18日

三月份,我的客戶走進辦公室,要求將她的報稅身分從「已婚」改為「單身」。她的丈夫已經訴請離婚。我當場震驚不已——從她2001年結婚至今,整整二十五年來,我一直為她的家庭處理稅務申報。

她在2001年初透過共同朋友認識了她的華裔美籍丈夫。當時她二十八歲,擁有北京大學的頂尖學歷,但在美國沒有任何專業證照。她的丈夫自稱在美國聯邦政府工作,年薪七萬五千美元。以那時八點二十七元人民幣兌一美元的匯率換算,在她心中等同於超過六十二萬人民幣——那是一筆令人咋舌的財富。他為她描繪出一幅好萊塢式美國夢的絢麗藍圖,而她就此心醉神迷。

她原本計畫在夏威夷繼續深造,但丈夫想要孩子。她妥協了,生了兩個小孩。然而,童話故事很快開始出現裂痕。她意識到,雖然丈夫的薪水聽起來豐厚,但美國的生活成本卻是北京的五倍。為了維持家計——也為了負擔私立學校的費用,因為夏威夷的公立學校系統是全國公認最差的之一——她被迫兼差兩份工作,一邊從事家庭的保姆工作,同時還要扛起全職家庭主婦的繁重家務。

二十五年來,她在美國的生活變成永無止盡、令人心力交瘁的工作與育兒循環。如今五十三歲,丈夫卻拋棄了她。她告訴我,這是最終極的背叛——不僅是來自她所信任的那個男人,更是來自美國夢本身那個空洞的承諾。

與她留在北京的雙胞胎姊姊相比,更是令人心碎。她的姊姊同樣有兩個孩子,但卻在兩位傭人的協助下撫養長大。那些孩子分別從北京大學和復旦大學畢業,大學學費僅是她客戶在美國為私立學校所付出費用的十分之一。我的客戶感嘆,長期的壓力與不快樂讓她衰老許多,而她的姊姊則擁有幸福穩定的婚姻,看起來足足年輕了十歲。

聽著她的故事,我不禁明白,為何如今眾多最聰明、最務實的年輕人——他們擁有高智商和高情商——會選擇保持單身,或者即使結婚,也堅決不願生育子女。

In March, my client walked into my office and asked to change her tax filing status from “married” to “single.” Her husband had filed for divorce. I was stunned—I had been preparing her family’s returns since she got married in 2001, a full 25 years ago.

She met her Chinese-American husband through mutual friends in early 2001. She was 28 at the time and held a prestigious degree from Peking University, though she had no American credentials. Her husband claimed to work for the U.S. federal government, earning $75,000 a year. With the exchange rate at 8.27 RMB to the dollar, that translated to over 620,000 RMB in her mind—a staggering fortune. He painted a glittering picture of the Hollywood-style American Dream, and she was swept away.

Her plan had been to continue her education in Hawaii, but her husband wanted babies. She acquiesced and had two children. Soon, however, the fairy tale began to crack. She realized that while his salary sounded substantial, the cost of living in America was five times higher than in Beijing. To make ends meet—and to afford private school, since Hawaii’s public school system is notoriously one of the worst in the nation—she was forced to work two jobs, juggling as family babysitting work alongside the full-time demands of homemaking.

For 25 years, her life in America became an endless, grueling cycle of work and motherhood. Now, at 53, her husband has abandoned her. It was, she told me, the ultimate betrayal—not just by the man she trusted, but by the hollow promise of the American Dream itself.

The contrast with her twin sister back in Beijing is heartbreaking. Her sister also has two children, but raised them with the help of two maids. Those children graduated from Peking and Fudan Universities, with college tuition costing only a tenth of what my client paid for private schooling in the U.S. My client lamented that the stress and unhappiness have aged her considerably, while her sister enjoys a happy, stable marriage and looks a full ten years younger.

Listening to her story, I couldn’t help but understand why so many of today’s brightest, most pragmatic young people—armed with high IQs and high EQs—are choosing to stay single, or, if they do marry, are steadfastly refusing to have children.

Video: Age 20+ girl from HK with high IQ and EQ lives in Zhongshan enjoying her life everyday!

Video: Age 20+ girl from HK with high IQ and EQ lives in Zhongshan enjoying her life everyday! – Johnson Choi is one of her fan. 一位20多歲、來自香港、高智商高情商嘅女仔,而家住喺中山,每日都好好享受生活!蔡永強係佢其中一個粉絲. 舊金山有些朋友要找女朋友或老婆,這樣的醒目女你追到嗎? 你千萬不要叫她來美國,不少金山少男試過,女方必定和你講再見,這些女孩不會來美國受苦那麼笨!💆‍♀️¥149足療任飲任食!鮑魚燉湯+云吞面+双皮奶+水果飲料 零推銷零小費|福田卓悅INTOWN奢華SPA&足療. 💆‍♀️¥149足療任飲任食!鮑魚燉湯+云吞面+双皮奶+水果飲料 零推銷零小費|福田卓悅INTOWN奢華SPA&足療

這次北上福田,實測了一間性價比極高、主打「環境新淨+餐飲超班」的連鎖按摩館。不用到處跑,按完摩還能直接在商場逛街食飯,絕對是都市人週末放鬆的完美路線!
📍 SPA 店家資訊店名: 上足SPA plus
地點: 深圳福田會展中心 卓悅INTOWN
Video https://youtu.be/MZLg_YBU7zk?is=4mMsgD4WyBbsYq1F
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0yceFa5FvXnnTX5TAHCv8TQHgqKvJ5xJA2emAXKnUEuGH9We6A8TYUq9gakL3v2yFl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8spAJfE/

Video: In the past, when the U.S. sanctioned China, China could only tough it out; but today, if the U.S. wants to strike again, why doesn’t it dare?

Video: In the past, when the U.S. sanctioned China, China could only tough it out; but today, if the U.S. wants to strike again, why doesn’t it dare? 影片有中英文字幕: 以前美國制裁中國,中國只能硬扛;今天再想下手,美國為什麼不敢了!

https://rumble.com/v7bgto0-in-the-past-when-the-u.s.-sanctioned-china-china-could-only-tough-it-out.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8spetER/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid022bCEy46jWtXyQX49PjUnSEHcQrZB5p1PagaiVayim3bVHGbibsWNktYH4nQQCb1Sl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Full video: https://youtu.be/UxjCugF9wjU?is=qr5oltGylVvnZ3nW

美國最尷尬的地方是什麼?不是不想制裁,而是發現過去“一按按鈕就讓別人疼”的制裁機器,打到中國身上,開始嚴重反噬了。
以前美國拿刀,別人流血;今天美國拿刀,得先看看刀柄是不是連著自己的手。從華為事件到新能源的全面崛起,美國本想用斷供讓中國低頭,卻逼著中國把“自主可控”變成了國家級共識。這是一場成本的重新計算,也是世界規則發生根本改變的信號。

What is the most awkward part for the U.S.? It’s not that it doesn’t want to sanction—it’s that it has discovered that the sanction machine that used to “make others hurt at the push of a button” has started to backfire severely when turned on China.

In the past, when the U.S. wielded the knife, others bled; today, when the U.S. wields the knife, it has to first check whether the handle is still attached to its own hand. From the Huawei incident to the full-scale rise of new energy, the U.S. tried to bring China to its knees by cutting off supplies, but instead forced China to turn “self-reliance and controllability” into a national consensus. This is a recalculation of costs, and also a signal that the world’s rules are undergoing a fundamental shift.

Video: The West still wants to rewrite the world’s rules? After the G7 summit, they realized they simply cannot do without China!

Video: The West still wants to rewrite the world’s rules? After the G7 summit, they realized they simply cannot do without China! 影片有中英文字幕:西方還想重寫世界規則?G7開完才發現,根本離不開中國!

https://rumble.com/v7bgrqs-the-west-still-wants-to-rewrite-the-worlds-rules.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8sgbghh/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0FiAupTzVq2pDG3p8vHxSgCAS1Xs4AXg8PMszLEhxfencfsTnK8UCMkbR8SikhWKMl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

中國連去都沒去,為什麼G7峰會的每個議題都繞不開中國? 貿易、供應鏈、新能源、全球南方、AI科技……西方越是想關起門來孤立中國,越是證明了中國作為全球“效率系統”的無可替代。這不是口號,而是實力結構帶來的真實打臉! 本期視頻,桃子帶你深度拆解G7峰會背後,西方最尷尬的“三重現實折射”。世界規則,早就不是少數人說了算的時代了.

China didn’t even attend, so why did every topic at the G7 summit revolve around China? Trade, supply chains, new energy, the Global South, AI technology… The more the West tries to close its doors and isolate China, the more it proves that China is irreplaceable as the world’s “efficiency system.” This isn’t just rhetoric—it’s a real slap in the face delivered by the very structure of power! In this video, Peach takes you on a deep dive into the three layers of “awkward reality” reflected in the G7 summit that the West finds most embarrassing. The era when a handful of people dictated the world’s rules is long over.

EXCLUSIVE: IN A BREATHTAKING feat of hypocrisy, the UK is taking drastic steps to stop “foreign interference” cash

EXCLUSIVE: IN A BREATHTAKING feat of hypocrisy, the UK is taking drastic steps to stop “foreign interference” cash while slamming Hong Kong for doing a basic, minimal version of the same thing.

Britain has long prohibited foreign payments to its political groups and recently escalated the law with a £100,000 annual cap on political donations from ITS OWN CITIZENS living abroad.

Keir Starmer’s government announced the new law on 25 March 2026, saying it was coming into force instantly and would have “retrospective effect”.

This had to be done to protect political “processes from foreign financial influence and interference”, a government statement claimed.

THE REAL STORY

The real story is totally different, according to the buzz in the Westminster coffee bars.

Cash-based foreign political interference (“foreign collusion” in legal terms) has been banned everywhere as an obvious evil for decades—except in Hong Kong, when the UK hypocritically long supported western-financed political opposition groups which continually campaigned to delay its introduction.

Beijing wised up to the trickery in 2020 and introduced a western-style law against foreign collusion in Hong Kong, bringing the city into line with the west.

REFORM FUNDING
In the UK, that law already existed—but was dramatically extended in March to include a cap on donations by British citizens abroad, rushed through to stop the explosive growth of rival party Reform.

That’s because Reform is financed by a pair of British crypto bros, one from Thailand and one from… Hong Kong (O the irony!).

As the UK prepares for a crucial by-election set to cause problems for the Prime Minister, “the Electoral Commission publishes the latest party funding figures and reveals who is backing the Reform UK operation”, reports the latest issue of Private Eye magazine.

‘MALIGN INTERFERENCE’
In the first 3 months of 2026, Christopher Harborne of Thailand gave £3 million (latest of a long line of donations) and Ben Delo of Hong Kong gave £4 million. (Delo says he is moving back to UK as his main home.)

It is right to come down hard on foreign payments to politicians because they were cases of “malign interference”, a Labour party spokesperson said. “Labour is introducing these landmark changes to protect UK democracy from [the] scourge of foreign actors and financial influence.”

This is a staggering level of hypocrisy.

In British Hong Kong, from at least 1990, the UK governors allowed foreign agents, largely from the US, to finance a group called “the pan-democrats” with tens of millions of dollars. Many of the transactions were recorded in the accounts of the National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA regime-change spin-off.

When Hong Kong introduced a law in June 2020 which prevented financial influence and political collusion from overseas, it was presented by the UK politicians and media as if it banned dissent.

No dissent was allowed, and the punishment was death “by firing squad”, reported Jimmy Lai, the UK’s favorite Hong Kong newsman.

NONE OF IT WAS TRUE
None of this was true. The 2020 National Security Law did not mention dissent, nor death penalties, nor firing squads in any form.

The law was largely a move to stop illicit cash payments to politicians in Hong Kong—bringing the city in line with the UK, US and other modern urban centers.

British passport holder Jimmy Lai and his sidekick, former US intelligence agent Mark Simon, had been earlier exposed by a disgruntled Apple Daily shareholder of delivering millions of dollars of unexplained cash to pan-democratic politicians.

NEWS BLACKOUT
Western mainstream media ran (and is still running) a news blackout on negative news about Jimmy Lai and the pan-democrats, who are continually presented as Hong Kong heroes, when they have been repeatedly exposed as being the opposite.

The vast majority of Hong Kong people want a positive relationship with Mainland China and oppose independence.

To take just one example, Reuters likes to paint China-hostile churchman Joseph Zen as a hero—without mentioning that he received multiple unexplained payments of about $3 million Hong Kong dollars, which is about US$380,000, delivered by Lai and Simon.

Had Zen been taking the cash in the west, the media would have torn him to shreds. But he works to demonize China, so the international media chooses not to report it.

Video: The West Exclaims “China is Perfect Superpower”! An In-Depth Look at Six Core Advantages

Video: The West Exclaims “China is Perfect Superpower”! An In-Depth Look at Six Core Advantages 影片有中英文字幕:西方驚呼 “中國是完美超級大國”!深度解密六大核心優勢

https://rumble.com/v7bg9z8-the-west-exclaims-china-is-perfect-superpower.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8sgeTuy/

🔴 西方智库给中国贴上“完美超级大国”的标签,你认为这是别有用心的捧杀,还是他们穷尽手段后彻底绝望的惊呼?
🔴 完整工业体系、超大市场、地缘纵深……在这“六边形”绝对优势中,你认为哪一张才是我们对抗外部围堵的最强底牌?
🔴 外部制裁打不垮的“完美系统”,却必须面对人口结构和金融风险的内部大考。未来十年,你觉得我们最大的挑战在哪里?
欢迎在评论区留下你的真实想法!点赞、订阅,带你读懂大国博弈背后的战略与经济逻辑。

🔴 Western think tanks have labeled China a “perfect superpower.” Do you think this is a deliberate attempt to overpraise and set China up, or is it a cry of utter despair after they have exhausted all their means?
🔴 With a complete industrial system, a mega-market, and deep geographic strategic depth… among these “hexagonal” absolute advantages, which one do you think is our strongest trump card against external encirclement?
🔴 This “perfect system” that external sanctions cannot break must nevertheless face the internal challenges of demographic structure and financial risks. In the next decade, where do you think our biggest challenge lies?
Feel free to leave your real thoughts in the comments! Like and subscribe, and we’ll help you understand the strategic and economic logic behind the great-power rivalry.

China Calls for Greater Justice and Equity in Global Governance – presents its latest vision for improving—and even transforming—global governance

China Calls for Greater Justice and Equity in Global Governance – presents its latest vision for improving—and even transforming—global governance. June 17, 2026 中国政府发布关于全球治理的白皮书: 丛林法则严重冲击国际法治;全球南方声音需要更多倾听! 中國呼籲全球治理更公平正義——提出改善乃至變革全球治理的最新願景。2026年6月17日

https://johnsonwkchoi.business.blog/2026/06/17/china-calls-for-greater-justice-and-equity-in-global-governance-presents-its-latest-vision-for-improving-and-even-transforming-global-governance/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8sbqYxn/
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8sbDqc1/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1684882262735092&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

中國國務院新聞辦公室週三發表題為《更加公正合理的全球治理:中國的理念、主張與行動》的白皮書。

白皮書發布旨在介紹中國關於全球治理的理念、主張和行動,凝聚國際社會更廣泛共識,更有效應對全球性挑戰,推動建設更加公正合理的全球治理體系。

白皮書指出,全球治理是關乎全人類福祉的共同事業,建設公正合理的全球治理體系是世界各國人民長期追求的共同願景。中國始終是全球治理的積極參與者、重要貢獻者和堅定建設者。

進入新時代後,習近平主席提出構建人類命運共同體理念。在推動共商共建共享的全球治理體系過程中,他倡導真正的多邊主義,推動建設平等有序的多極化世界,以及普惠包容的經濟全球化。白皮書指出,這些理念為全球治理改革與發展提供了重要指引。

2025年,習近平提出全球治理倡議(Global Governance Initiative,GGI),旨在為當今時代兩個重大課題提供中國方案:應建立什麼樣的全球治理體系,以及如何改革和完善全球治理。

白皮書表示,全球治理倡議一經提出,便迅速獲得近160個國家和國際組織支持,超過60個國家加入「全球治理之友小組」。國際社會普遍認為,該倡議發出了明確信號:堅持多邊主義、凝聚各方力量、共同追求公平未來。

白皮書指出,全球治理倡議順應國際關係民主化的大趨勢,增強了國際社會踐行多邊主義的信心,並為完善全球治理提供了清晰且可行的路線圖,為動盪不安的世界注入寶貴的穩定性和正能量。

中國提出全球治理倡議,是為了加快建設更加公正合理的全球治理體系。白皮書強調,堅決維護聯合國的權威和地位,是有效落實這項倡議的根本保障。

白皮書還指出,倡議的成功實施有賴於大國承擔責任,也有賴於各國團結合作,共同應對和平與發展赤字。各國應堅定維護以聯合國為核心的國際體系,維護以國際法為基礎的國際秩序,維護以《聯合國憲章》宗旨和原則為基礎的國際關係基本準則,而不是另起爐灶、重建體系。

除前言和結語外,白皮書共分五個部分:

  1. 《當今世界面臨嚴峻複雜挑戰》
  2. 《全球治理倡議回應時代挑戰》
  3. 《中國推動全球治理的貢獻》
  4. 《引領變革方向,共創光明未來》
  5. 《站在歷史關鍵節點攜手前行》

China’s State Council Information Office on Wednesday released a white paper titled “More Just and Equitable Global Governance: China’s Principles, Proposals and Actions.”

The white paper was published to introduce China’s principles, proposals and actions on global governance, foster broader consensus within the international community, ensure more effective responses to global challenges, and build a more just and equitable global governance system.

Global governance is a common endeavor that bears on the well-being of all humanity, and building a just and equitable global governance system is a shared vision long pursued by people from across the world, the white paper said, adding that China has always been an active participant in, contributor to, and builder of global governance.

In the new era, President Xi Jinping put forward the vision of building a community with a shared future for humanity. In promoting a global governance system characterized by extensive consultation and joint contribution for shared benefit, he has called for true multilateralism to foster an equal and orderly multipolar world and a universally beneficial and inclusive economic globalization, according to the white paper.

In 2025, Xi proposed the Global Governance Initiative (GGI), which is designed to offer a Chinese solution to the two pressing questions of the era: what kind of global governance system should be established, and how global governance can be reformed and improved.

Upon its introduction, the GGI swiftly gained support from nearly 160 countries and international organizations, with over 60 countries joining the Group of Friends of Global Governance. The international community believes that the GGI sends a clear signal: uphold multilateralism, unite forces, and pursue a fair future, the white paper said.

The GGI aligns with the growing trend towards greater democracy in international relations and bolsters international confidence in practicing multilateralism. It offers a clear and feasible roadmap for improving global governance, bringing valuable stability and positive energy to a turbulent world, according to the white paper.

China has proposed the GGI to expedite the building of a more just and equitable global governance system. Resolutely upholding the UN’s authority and status is fundamental to the effective implementation of this initiative, the white paper said.

Success will also hinge on major countries bearing a sense of responsibility, and on all nations uniting and cooperating to address deficits in peace and development. All countries should firmly uphold the international system with the UN at its core, safeguard the international order based on international law, and uphold the basic norms governing international relations underpinned by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, instead of reinventing the wheel, according to the white paper.

Apart from the preface and conclusion, the white paper has five parts: “The World Today Faces Severe and Complex Challenges,” “The Global Governance Initiative Responds to Challenges of Our Times,” “China’s Contribution to Promoting Global Governance,” “Guiding the Direction of Change Towards a Bright Future,” and “Moving Forward Hand in Hand at a Critical Juncture in History.”