Video: Why has China’s national fortune been so favorable? Five U.S. presidents have tried to undermine China, yet in doing so, they have only helped forge a sword for China. After three decades of containment, not a single attempt has succeeded. So where exactly has the United States failed? 影片有中英文字幕: 中國的國運為什麼這麼好？五任美國總統想毀掉中國，結果替中國磨出了一把刀，圍堵中國三十年沒有一次成功，美國到底輸在哪裡? 全球百年大變局，東升西降已經成為定局!
Video: Behind the Plaza Accord: Was the U.S. Too Ruthless, or Was Japan Too Greedy? The Truth Behind Japan’s Lost Decades: The “God-Tier Trap” That Changed Asia’s Destiny in 1985 | Business Logic. Was Japan’s Lost 30 Years Really a Trap Set by the United States? 影片有中英文字幕: 廣場協議幕後，是美國太狠，還是日本太貪？日本失落的真相：1985 年，那場改變亞洲國運的「神級陷阱」|商業邏輯. 日本失去的30年，到底是不是美國設下的陷阱？
A Stunning Discovery by US Media: Fewer Chinese Students Are Coming to America, While Chinese-American Professors Are Leaving 美媒的一個驚人發現：來美中國留學生少了，同一時間，美國華人教授走了……
November 17, 2025 — The latest edition of the U.S. Open Doors Report was released. Admissions offices at American universities were stunned: there are now only 78,583 Chinese undergraduates in the U.S., down from 150,000 just a few years ago.
The total number of international students in the U.S. hit a new high of 1.17 million, with Indian students surging to 360,000 and displacing China from the top spot it had held for 15 years. Students from all over the world are still flocking to America — but Chinese students are staying away. For second- and third-tier universities that have relied on Chinese tuition for over a decade, dormitories are empty and classes can’t even be filled. Why can’t they come? Visas are the first iron gate.
Blow 1: Visa Hangups
On May 28, 2025, the U.S. State Department issued a statement vowing to scrutinize Chinese students. Secretary of State Marco Rubio took to social media the same day, declaring: “Vigorously revoke Chinese students’ visas.”
What counts as a “sensitive field”? No one knows. The entire STEM spectrum could be included, and no one knows when they might cross the line. Soon after, visa rules tightened further — even applicants under 14 and over 80 were required to appear for in-person interviews.
Students in sensitive majors fared even worse: their visa validity was slashed to three months, and each application dragged on for six months. Some students who went home to China for summer vacation never made it back. Classes had already started, but they were still stuck waiting in China. Can you feel the urgency?
Blow 2: Professors Raided
Students aren’t coming, and Chinese professors on the podium are also leaving. In March 2025, something happened that sent shockwaves through U.S. academia.
Professor Wang Xiaofeng, a computer science faculty member at Indiana University who had worked there for two decades, had his home suddenly raided by the FBI. The university then moved swiftly: without charges or a conviction, they terminated both Wang and his wife, who also worked at the school.
The university skipped the required ten-day notice and on-campus hearing, offering only one explanation: “Ask the FBI.”
His wife, Ma Nianli, said she wakes up every day hoping it’s a nightmare — having given twenty years of her youth to the university, without even a reason why.
Word spread, and Chinese-American scholars across the country felt a chill down their spines. MIT professor Chen Gang, who was arrested in 2021 and spent nearly a year in detention before being exonerated, said he still trembles with anger when recalling the day he was taken away. His verdict: two words — disgusting.
Blow 3: Data Tells the Story
It’s not just a handful of people’s feelings. Princeton professor Xie Yu conducted a longitudinal study covering more than 20,000 institutions.
From 2010 to 2021, the number of Chinese-American scientists leaving the U.S. each year grew from 900 to over 2,600 — quadrupling. Where did they go? In 2010, 48% returned to mainland China and Hong Kong; by 2021, that figure had risen to 67%.
Xie’s team also surveyed 1,304 tenured Chinese-American scientists: 72% felt unsafe conducting research in the U.S., and 86% said it is now much harder to recruit top-tier students than five years ago. Put these three numbers together, and the message is clear — the environment is no longer viable, and people are no longer staying.
Blow 4: Voting with Their Feet
In January 2024, Gao Huajian, a top expert in mechanics and a seven-academy academician who had won the highest international award in solid mechanics, returned to Tsinghua University full-time.
At the end of the year, Wang Cunyu, a member of the U.S. National Academy of Medicine, left UCLA to become dean at Peking University, calling his return to his alma mater “both an honor and a responsibility.”
In early 2025, nuclear physicist Liu Chang left Princeton for Peking University’s School of Physics. Mathematician Lin Huaxin, who had spent nearly 40 years in the U.S., returned to Shanghai. Computer scientist Chen Jing left the U.S. for Tsinghua.
The media tallied it up: since 2024, at least 17 top scientists have returned from overseas, over 75% of them from the U.S.
In March 2025, Nature conducted a survey of more than 1,600 U.S. researchers — over 1,200 were considering leaving, a staggering 75%, citing government funding cuts and mass layoffs.
Ezra Vogel, former director of Harvard’s Fairbank Center, had warned early on that America was losing an entire generation of people who understand China. Mathematician Shing-Tung Yau put it more bluntly: “These scientists have no choice but to leave.”
For a century, America has been sustained by brilliant minds from around the world. Now visas are choked off, Chinese scholars are being closely scrutinized, and funding is slashed — why would they stay? The data already spells out the trend in black and white. What happens next? Time will tell.
“It’s time the American people learn the real story,” spy chief Tulsi Gabbard in a sensation-causing video released on X and a statement on the internet.
And what a story it is.
TRUTH AT LAST The US spent millions to finance a lab in China’s Wuhan to experiment on killer viruses.
The research was on a technique called “gain of function” which some people see as weaponization of the viruses.
That research is “now widely viewed as the source of the unintentional lab leak that sparked the pandemic,” said Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence.
“This dangerous research caused immeasurable harm and countless lost lives,” she added.
PREFERRED NARRATIVE After the pandemic broke out, Washington then worked to tell the world it could not have been a lab leak.
The preferred story circulating at the time was to say that animal-to-human transmission evolved in China due to the circumstances there.
But the evidence tells a different tale, the US spy chief said, releasing a new batch of top secret documents today, her last day in office.
120 BIOLABS
The story begins with the US quietly setting up 120 biological laboratories across more than 30 countries. Some of these laboratories were involved in research on hazardous pathogens, she said.
Dr Anthony Fauci, while serving as head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, sent millions of dollars of US taxpayer cash to be spent on bat coronaviruses at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, she said.
In 2019, the Covid-19 virus apparently emerged in several locations around the world—but was first formally detected by scientists in Wuhan, China, at the end of 2019.
It was soon found all over the world. The “pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions,” Gabbard said.
PREFERRED NARRATIVE For the US, the preferred story was that it was NOT a lab leak—because the world would realize that the Pentagon was financing biolabs around the world, and at home.
People raising the alarm about the biolabs were accused of “pushing Russian and Chinese disinformation”.
When the existence of the labs could not be denied, the BBC and other media reported that they were “peaceful labs” which were financed for entirely positive reasons—a line that Pentagon-watchers found hard to swallow.
LIED ABOUT INTELLIGENCE CONNECTION Fauci worked with senior intelligence agents in the early days of the pandemic to shape the narrative but lied about it, Gabbard said.
In his testimony before the House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic in 2024, he was asked under oath whether he had communicated with intelligence agencies concerning viral research before, during or after the pandemic.
Fauci replied: “Not to my knowledge, about COVID.”
In January 2025, many people were puzzled when Former President Joe Biden issued “a pre-emptive pardon” to Fauci. Pardons, by definition, are given to people who have broken the law—but this had not happened at that time.
TREMENDOUS HARDSHIP Gabbard is retiring to spend more time with her husband, who has cancer.
But she wanted to get the truth about this subject out there before she disappeared. She says the evidence indicates US-funded research was the root of the problem.
“The COVID-19 pandemic caused tremendous hardship and pain for millions of our fellow Americans and for countless people around the world,” she said.
In March, my client walked into my office and asked to change her tax filing status from “married” to “single.” Her husband had filed for divorce. I was stunned—I had been preparing her family’s returns since she got married in 2001, a full 25 years ago.
She met her Chinese-American husband through mutual friends in early 2001. She was 28 at the time and held a prestigious degree from Peking University, though she had no American credentials. Her husband claimed to work for the U.S. federal government, earning $75,000 a year. With the exchange rate at 8.27 RMB to the dollar, that translated to over 620,000 RMB in her mind—a staggering fortune. He painted a glittering picture of the Hollywood-style American Dream, and she was swept away.
Her plan had been to continue her education in Hawaii, but her husband wanted babies. She acquiesced and had two children. Soon, however, the fairy tale began to crack. She realized that while his salary sounded substantial, the cost of living in America was five times higher than in Beijing. To make ends meet—and to afford private school, since Hawaii’s public school system is notoriously one of the worst in the nation—she was forced to work two jobs, juggling as family babysitting work alongside the full-time demands of homemaking.
For 25 years, her life in America became an endless, grueling cycle of work and motherhood. Now, at 53, her husband has abandoned her. It was, she told me, the ultimate betrayal—not just by the man she trusted, but by the hollow promise of the American Dream itself.
The contrast with her twin sister back in Beijing is heartbreaking. Her sister also has two children, but raised them with the help of two maids. Those children graduated from Peking and Fudan Universities, with college tuition costing only a tenth of what my client paid for private schooling in the U.S. My client lamented that the stress and unhappiness have aged her considerably, while her sister enjoys a happy, stable marriage and looks a full ten years younger.
Listening to her story, I couldn’t help but understand why so many of today’s brightest, most pragmatic young people—armed with high IQs and high EQs—are choosing to stay single, or, if they do marry, are steadfastly refusing to have children.
Video: Age 20+ girl from HK with high IQ and EQ lives in Zhongshan enjoying her life everyday! – Johnson Choi is one of her fan. 一位20多歲、來自香港、高智商高情商嘅女仔，而家住喺中山，每日都好好享受生活！蔡永強係佢其中一個粉絲. 舊金山有些朋友要找女朋友或老婆，這樣的醒目女你追到嗎？ 你千萬不要叫她來美國，不少金山少男試過，女方必定和你講再見，這些女孩不會來美國受苦那麼笨！💆♀️¥149足療任飲任食！鮑魚燉湯+云吞面+双皮奶+水果飲料 零推銷零小費｜福田卓悅INTOWN奢華SPA&足療. 💆♀️¥149足療任飲任食！鮑魚燉湯+云吞面+双皮奶+水果飲料 零推銷零小費｜福田卓悅INTOWN奢華SPA&足療
Video: In the past, when the U.S. sanctioned China, China could only tough it out; but today, if the U.S. wants to strike again, why doesn’t it dare? 影片有中英文字幕: 以前美國制裁中國，中國只能硬扛；今天再想下手，美國為什麼不敢了!
What is the most awkward part for the U.S.? It’s not that it doesn’t want to sanction—it’s that it has discovered that the sanction machine that used to “make others hurt at the push of a button” has started to backfire severely when turned on China.
In the past, when the U.S. wielded the knife, others bled; today, when the U.S. wields the knife, it has to first check whether the handle is still attached to its own hand. From the Huawei incident to the full-scale rise of new energy, the U.S. tried to bring China to its knees by cutting off supplies, but instead forced China to turn “self-reliance and controllability” into a national consensus. This is a recalculation of costs, and also a signal that the world’s rules are undergoing a fundamental shift.
Video: The West still wants to rewrite the world’s rules? After the G7 summit, they realized they simply cannot do without China! 影片有中英文字幕：西方還想重寫世界規則？G7開完才發現，根本離不開中國!
China didn’t even attend, so why did every topic at the G7 summit revolve around China? Trade, supply chains, new energy, the Global South, AI technology… The more the West tries to close its doors and isolate China, the more it proves that China is irreplaceable as the world’s “efficiency system.” This isn’t just rhetoric—it’s a real slap in the face delivered by the very structure of power! In this video, Peach takes you on a deep dive into the three layers of “awkward reality” reflected in the G7 summit that the West finds most embarrassing. The era when a handful of people dictated the world’s rules is long over.
EXCLUSIVE: IN A BREATHTAKING feat of hypocrisy, the UK is taking drastic steps to stop “foreign interference” cash while slamming Hong Kong for doing a basic, minimal version of the same thing.
Britain has long prohibited foreign payments to its political groups and recently escalated the law with a £100,000 annual cap on political donations from ITS OWN CITIZENS living abroad.
Keir Starmer’s government announced the new law on 25 March 2026, saying it was coming into force instantly and would have “retrospective effect”.
This had to be done to protect political “processes from foreign financial influence and interference”, a government statement claimed.
THE REAL STORY
The real story is totally different, according to the buzz in the Westminster coffee bars.
Cash-based foreign political interference (“foreign collusion” in legal terms) has been banned everywhere as an obvious evil for decades—except in Hong Kong, when the UK hypocritically long supported western-financed political opposition groups which continually campaigned to delay its introduction.
Beijing wised up to the trickery in 2020 and introduced a western-style law against foreign collusion in Hong Kong, bringing the city into line with the west.
REFORM FUNDING In the UK, that law already existed—but was dramatically extended in March to include a cap on donations by British citizens abroad, rushed through to stop the explosive growth of rival party Reform.
That’s because Reform is financed by a pair of British crypto bros, one from Thailand and one from… Hong Kong (O the irony!).
As the UK prepares for a crucial by-election set to cause problems for the Prime Minister, “the Electoral Commission publishes the latest party funding figures and reveals who is backing the Reform UK operation”, reports the latest issue of Private Eye magazine.
‘MALIGN INTERFERENCE’ In the first 3 months of 2026, Christopher Harborne of Thailand gave £3 million (latest of a long line of donations) and Ben Delo of Hong Kong gave £4 million. (Delo says he is moving back to UK as his main home.)
It is right to come down hard on foreign payments to politicians because they were cases of “malign interference”, a Labour party spokesperson said. “Labour is introducing these landmark changes to protect UK democracy from [the] scourge of foreign actors and financial influence.”
This is a staggering level of hypocrisy.
In British Hong Kong, from at least 1990, the UK governors allowed foreign agents, largely from the US, to finance a group called “the pan-democrats” with tens of millions of dollars. Many of the transactions were recorded in the accounts of the National Endowment for Democracy, a CIA regime-change spin-off.
When Hong Kong introduced a law in June 2020 which prevented financial influence and political collusion from overseas, it was presented by the UK politicians and media as if it banned dissent.
No dissent was allowed, and the punishment was death “by firing squad”, reported Jimmy Lai, the UK’s favorite Hong Kong newsman.
NONE OF IT WAS TRUE None of this was true. The 2020 National Security Law did not mention dissent, nor death penalties, nor firing squads in any form.
The law was largely a move to stop illicit cash payments to politicians in Hong Kong—bringing the city in line with the UK, US and other modern urban centers.
British passport holder Jimmy Lai and his sidekick, former US intelligence agent Mark Simon, had been earlier exposed by a disgruntled Apple Daily shareholder of delivering millions of dollars of unexplained cash to pan-democratic politicians.
NEWS BLACKOUT Western mainstream media ran (and is still running) a news blackout on negative news about Jimmy Lai and the pan-democrats, who are continually presented as Hong Kong heroes, when they have been repeatedly exposed as being the opposite.
The vast majority of Hong Kong people want a positive relationship with Mainland China and oppose independence.
To take just one example, Reuters likes to paint China-hostile churchman Joseph Zen as a hero—without mentioning that he received multiple unexplained payments of about $3 million Hong Kong dollars, which is about US$380,000, delivered by Lai and Simon.
Had Zen been taking the cash in the west, the media would have torn him to shreds. But he works to demonize China, so the international media chooses not to report it.
