Video with English and Chinese subtitles: How US & Japan promotes fake news to demonize Chinese and China, and why so many overseas Chinese are so happy to be part of it? 視頻有中英文字幕: 美國與日本如何散佈假新聞以妖魔化中國人及中國,以及為何那麼多海外華人樂於參與其中? 中國製造 張雪機車揚威海外!外網徹底炸鍋!法國車手薦比斯首度來華看清真實的中國,直言歐媒造謠誤導大眾絕不盲從!
“Made in China! Zhang Xue’s motorcycles triumph overseas! Foreign social media has completely exploded! Jianbisi visits China for the first time to see the truth and buy Chinese products, openly stating that European media spreads rumors and misleads the public—and he absolutely will not blindly follow!”
Maye Musk (Elon’s mother): I agree. Each city has its own charm with different cultural sites to see. Buildings and streets are clean and in good repair. Also, people are polite, hard-working, and respectful. I feel safe, so enjoy going to China.
Sore losers: We prefer hating China, because it is more enjoyable that way.
Title: Structural Resilience and the Outlook for China’s Economic Recovery. By Johnson Choi, MBA. International Business Consultant since 1985. Aug 15, 2026 結構韌性與中國經濟復甦展望. 作者: 蔡永強, 商科碩士. 國際商業顧問(自1985年起)2026年8月15日
Executive Summary When assessing the likelihood of a strong economic rebound, it is critical to distinguish between cyclical volatility and structural decay. While recent quarters have presented headwinds, these must be contextualized within a millennium-long track record of economic dominance and a governance model built for long-term execution. The probability of a sustained recovery remains exceptionally high, anchored by historical precedent, institutional design, and quantifiable social stability.
Historical and Current Economic Standing
· Millennial Dominance: China has been the world’s largest economy for 2,200 out of the last 2,400 years, underscoring its deep-rooted capacity for economic regeneration. · Contemporary Metrics: By Purchasing Power Parity (PPP), the United Nations and World Bank have ranked China as the world’s largest economy since 2014. This is not an anomaly but a reflection of structural scale.
Technocratic Governance and Institutional Integrity
· Expert-Led Administration: The country is governed by a technocratic elite—predominantly engineers and scientists—fostering a pragmatic, data-driven approach to national planning, distinct from systems dominated by career legal or entertainment professionals. · Clear Separation of Powers: There is a strict demarcation between public office and private enterprise. The absence of a “revolving door” between state regulators and corporate boards significantly mitigates conflicts of interest and regulatory capture. · Meritocratic Accountability: Officials at the national, provincial, city, and village levels are subject to rigorous Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Their career advancement is directly tied to measurable economic and social deliverables, mirroring the performance-based culture of Fortune 500 multinationals.
Social Mandate and Execution Track Record
· High Public Trust: According to independent research from Harvard University, approximately 90% of Chinese citizens express high approval of the central government’s performance, indicating a robust social contract and domestic cohesion. · Credibility and Delivery: The administration maintains a strong track record of fulfilling policy pledges. Governance success is measured through tangible, everyday outcomes—including affordable housing, universal healthcare, educational access, pension security, and environmental sustainability.
Conclusion While short-term fluctuations are inevitable in any large economy, China’s recovery potential is underpinned by deep structural advantages: a historically proven capacity for resurgence, a technocratic meritocracy, and a performance-driven state focused on concrete deliverables. These factors suggest that the current downturn is more accurately characterized as a temporary correction within a long-term upward trajectory, rather than a permanent reversal.
Frontier Chronicles video: Hong Kong Students Explore Xinjiang Cotton Fields, Marveled by High-Tech, debunking US fake news demonizing Chinese and China 《邊疆紀事》影片:香港學生探索新疆棉田,驚嘆高科技,戳破美國抹黑中國及中國人的假新聞
I wonder what is everyone’s first impression when it comes to Xinjiang? Is it the distant Gobi desert or the scenic snow-capped grasslands? In fact, this region, located on the western edge and an important trade and cultural hub, has experienced quite a booming development momentum in recent years.
The Sun Project 2026 Xinjiang Visitor Tour, an annual summer event organized by Radio Television Hong Kong, led 106 students from 77 secondary schools to the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region on July 3 for a seven-day visit. What impressions of Xinjiang did this trip add to Hong Kong middle school students?
Ask “Have you been to China?” and listen carefully to the answer. By Johnson Choi, MBA, International Business Consultant since 1985. Aug 15 2026 問「你去過中國嗎?」 並仔細聆聽對方的回答. 作者: 蔡永強, 商科碩士. 國際商務顧問(1985年至今)
In a recent Cambridge debate, Kevin O’Leary was asked precisely that, given China’s current visa-free policy for 50 countries. His reply—”Have you been to the moon?”—was a telling deflection rather than a substantive response.
That single question serves as a revealing litmus test. In my 45 years working with international clients, I’ve noticed that many overseas Chinese who are most vocal in their criticism have not returned recently. Their reluctance often stems from two underlying dynamics:
Outdated narratives: Many left when China was comparatively underdeveloped. Today, its rapid progress rivals or surpasses their adopted homes in key areas. Acknowledging this would undermine the narrative they’ve upheld for decades, creating social and personal dissonance.
Practical entrenchment: Having established deep financial and social ties abroad—including reliance on local free social welfare systems—returning is no longer feasible. Telling the truth will make them lose face! Reinforcing negative stereotypes becomes a psychological justification for their choices.
Ultimately, the way someone answers “Have you been?”—or how they avoid it—often reveals their own biases and insecurities far more than it reveals anything about China today.
The foreign media have finally come around! In a report, The Economist very frustratingly wrote… that the West will lose valuable talent! 94% of Chinese students return to China. When white Americans feel that the American Dream is shattered, Chinese people also find that opportunities in America are pretty much nonexistent, so returning to China after graduation is only natural. Report by Johnson Choi, MBA, International Business Consultant since 1985 from Silicon Valley 外媒終於回過味來了!《經濟學人》在報道中非常沮喪地寫道…西方將失去寶貴的人才! 94%中國留學生返回中國. 當美國白人覺得美國夢破碎時, 中國人也美國機會差不多是沒有, 所以畢業後返回中國是理所當然的事情. 蔡永強在美國矽谷報導.