Video: Director Yang Jiechi’s stern response at the China-U.S. high-level strategic dialogue in Anchorage on March 18, 2021, was so well said—it truly speaks the minds of 1.4 billion Chinese people! 2021年3月18日中美阿拉斯加高層戰略對話上，楊潔篪主任的嚴正回應講得太好，想出14億中國人民的心聲!

「我們把你們想得太好了，我們認為你們會遵守基本的外交禮節，所以我們剛才必須闡明我們的立場。我現在講一句，你們沒有資格在中國的面前說，你們從實力的地位出發同中國談話。」

「二十年前、三十年前你們就沒有這個地位講這個話，因為中國人是不吃這一套的。如果你們要跟我們好好地打交道，那麼我們就相互尊重打交道。合作對雙方有利，特別是這是世界各國人民的要求。」

「至於說，美國人民百折不撓，美國人民當然是偉大的人民，中國人民也是偉大的人民啊。難道我們吃洋人的苦頭還少嗎？難道我們被外國圍堵的時間還短嗎？只要中國的制度對頭，中國的人民是聰明的！要卡住我們是卡不住的。歷史會證明，對中國採取『卡脖子』的辦法、來打壓的辦法，最後受損失的是自己。」

https://rumble.com/v7eu37a-director-yang-jiechis-stern-response-at-the-china-u.s.-high-level-strategic.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vvEPvd/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AhG8o5x3dt
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0qvLopM4gt8DR6uGnu28oVJdzL159a4NqNK5UAQKqYz6LkpFM9pLKk39dh3U1bavJl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

‘We thought too well of you. We believed that you would abide by basic diplomatic protocols, so we had to make our position clear just now. Let me say this: You have no right to speak to China from a position of strength.’

‘Twenty or thirty years ago, you did not even have the standing to say such things, because the Chinese people do not buy this. If you want to deal with us properly, then we will engage each other with mutual respect. Cooperation benefits both sides, and more importantly, it is what the people of all nations demand.’

‘As for the American people being resilient—of course they are a great people, and the Chinese people are also a great people. Haven’t we Chinese suffered enough at the hands of foreigners? Haven’t we been subjected to foreign encirclement and containment long enough? As long as China’s system is right, the Chinese people are wise! They will not be able to choke us off. History will prove that the approach of blockading and suppressing China will only end up hurting themselves.'”

Video: Why some Chinese demonized and even have death wishes on their motherland? 視頻有中英文字幕: 為什麼有些中國人喜歡妖魔化更有不少竟然希望自己的祖國走向滅亡？

From poverty in 1989 to global power in 2026, China now leads the world in PPP economic output, manufacturing depth, shipbuilding, EVs and green energy, while ranking among the leaders in military capability, space technology, satellite navigation, space stations, and 5th- and 6th-generation fighter development. 從1989年的貧困到2026年的全球強國，中國如今在購買力平價經濟產出、製造業深度、造船、電動車和綠色能源方面領先世界，同時在軍事能力、太空技術、衛星導航、太空站，以及第五代和第六代戰機研發方面也位居全球前列.
https://rumble.com/v7etqu4-why-some-chinese-demonized-and-even-have-death-wishes-on-their-motherland.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8v7c9j5/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid027Xurbdgo5tiXEPGxqGaXrzKa1KgASqnWu7C5Vd1H7QXCtw2VzQ22Jrz3kX8iS8iDl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

Video: Braised Fish Heads for Dinner Tonight 今晚晚餐吃紅燒魚頭
https://rumble.com/v7etm8k-braised-fish-heads-for-dinner-tonight.html
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AvHel3GtLQ
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vWbYaa/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0Qb2e8RDkm4NUr9HnCScr7Swf37QAHNP3KbDoT6GkYpnfkd29e4QA9ch7vudm5VRhl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

Do you understand what $50 trillion in US debt actually means for you and me? Your hard-earned money, invested exclusively in US assets without diversification beyond the dollar and American territories, could be a fatal mistake. By Johnson Choi, MBA. International Business Consultant since 1985

您是否了解，美國高達50兆美元的國債，對您和我究竟意味著什麼？您辛苦賺來的錢，如果只投入美國資產，而未分散投資於美元及美國領土以外的標的，可能是一個致命的錯誤。作者：蔡永強，商科碩士，國際財經顧問(1985年至今)

https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AUpC8bx5aZ
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vW1RTv/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0ST38Hd1m5UCsGAop9CAZcb5iPgUcRm3ujQnsrU5tpKjrVbSnCN5BVg8uufyrKMqul&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

請看財政現實：美國政府年收入為5.35兆美元，但支出達7.65兆美元（其中僅利息支付就是1.24兆美元佔了收入的23%），這導致年度赤字支出達到30%。

如果您是會計師或是一家之主，在平衡帳目時，這些數字難道不會讓您深感憂慮嗎？

如果這些數字沒有讓您擔憂，那麼請想一想，各國央行——過去一直是美國國債的穩定買家——如今已停止購買。

後果顯而易見：美國被迫升息，而財政部則被迫印更多鈔票來買回自己的債務，從而引發危險的滾雪球效應。

印鈔票會帶來嚴重後果：通貨膨脹上升，美元貶值，惡性循環就此形成。隨著政府被迫進一步升息，赤字也將持續擴大。若此循環不加制止地重複，最終美元崩潰將無可避免。

Look at the fiscal reality: the US government generates $5.35 trillion in annual revenue, yet spends 7.65 trillion of which is dedicated to interest payments alone is 1.24 trillions, consuming 23% of its income. This results in an annual deficit spending of 30%.

If you were an accountant or a head of household balancing the books, wouldn’t these figures deeply concern you?

If they don’t, consider that central banks—once consistent buyers of US debt—have now halted their purchases.

The fallout is clear. The US is compelled to raise interest rates, while the Treasury is forced to print more money to buy its own debt, triggering a dangerous snowball effect.

Printing money carries severe consequences: inflation rises, the dollar depreciates, and a vicious cycle takes hold. As the government is forced to hike rates further, the deficit grows larger. If this cycle repeats unchecked, the eventual collapse of the US dollar becomes inevitable.

Truth By Ronny TONG Ka Wah 真理? 湯家驊

什麼是真理？真理是事實還是觀點？真理有沒有劃一的準則？這些問題一直困擾着很多人。上星期支聯會及其領導層被檢控煽動顛覆國家政權罪審判完畢，法庭宣判罪成，終於把這歷時近5 年的敏感案件畫上句號。有人質疑支聯會舉辦六四晚會幾十年，最終以顛覆罪終結，「真理」何在？

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vpy2Ts/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0SZNWVNngvZya9a9yVXmMNgDUWmnjvtdVQiHPDBXDjwJmoYvbXhcnoXDe5Xp4yc5Cl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

事實是，法庭清楚言明對支聯會的檢控是因其組織綱領主張「結束一黨專政」，而並非因為舉辦六四晚會。推翻政權與悼念死者是兩回事，怎可混淆不清？出席過不少六四晚會，但每當台上主辦者高呼「結束一黨專政」時，身邊並不是所有人也應聲高呼。所以一般香港人是明白這分別的。

從法律角度來看，六四晚會得到政府在《公安條例》下批准後進行，從來不是什麼犯罪行為 。但假若有人利用這場合倡議結束一黨專政，而又公開宣稱不相信從合法程序下進行修改憲法，甚至公然焚燒憲法，那麼餘下的唯一途徑必然是從法律以外達至這一目的。法律以外的行為便是違法；違法便有法律後果。更重要的是，推翻了政權，國家失去管治能力，失去制度可循，怎會安全？民生怎可穩定？以非法途徑達至傷害國家的目的，怎會是「真理」？這是邏輯，也是事實 。

因為政治立場而對事物有不同看法是可以理解的；但任何看法也要建基於事實。行為是否違法，只可由法庭界定，也應該是事實 。如果有人不認同法庭在法律爭議上有最終判斷權力，那便是連司法制度也不認同了。事實是生活在一個社會裏，如果對管治、對制度、對法律均不認同，那麼活在這社會裏的意義也很難存在。也許這才是最具意義的真理 。

What is truth? Is truth a matter of fact or a matter of opinion? Is there a single, uniform standard for truth? These questions have long troubled many people. Last week, the trial of the Hong Kong Alliance in Support of Patriotic Democratic Movements of China and its leadership on charges of inciting subversion of state power concluded, with the court handing down guilty verdicts. This finally brought to a close a sensitive case that had lasted nearly five years. Some people have questioned how an organization that held June 4 candlelight vigils for decades could ultimately end with convictions for subversion, asking: where is the “truth” in this?

The fact is that the court clearly stated that the prosecution of the Alliance was based on its organizational platform advocating the “ending of one-party dictatorship,” not on its holding of June 4 vigils. Overthrowing a political regime and mourning the dead are two different matters. How can the two be confused? I have attended quite a number of June 4 vigils, but whenever the organizers on stage shouted “End one-party dictatorship,” not everyone around me joined in. So ordinary Hong Kong people understand the distinction.

From a legal perspective, June 4 vigils that were held after receiving government approval under the Public Order Ordinance were never, in themselves, criminal acts. However, if someone uses such an occasion to advocate ending one-party rule, while publicly declaring that they do not believe in amending the Constitution through lawful procedures, and even openly burning the Constitution, then the only remaining means of achieving that objective must necessarily lie outside the law. Conduct outside the law is unlawful, and unlawful conduct carries legal consequences. More importantly, if a political regime is overthrown and the state loses its capacity to govern and the institutional framework on which it relies, how can there be security? How can people’s livelihoods remain stable? How can achieving an objective that harms the country through unlawful means be called “truth”? This is both logic and fact.

It is understandable that people may have different views on matters because of their political positions. But any view must be based on facts. Whether conduct is unlawful can only be determined by the courts, and that determination should itself be regarded as a fact. If someone does not accept that the courts have the final authority to decide legal disputes, then they are also rejecting the judicial system itself.

The fact is that, when living in a society, if one rejects its governance, its institutions, and its laws altogether, then it becomes difficult to find meaning in continuing to live within that society. Perhaps that is the most meaningful truth of all.

“The root of all evil is headed by the West’s false democracy.” Wah Kee’s late-night livestream video on August 28 includes both Chinese and English subtitles: Convicted of incitement to subvert state power! In the Hong Kong Alliance subversion case, Inspector Wah provides a detailed analysis of the case. “萬惡之源以西方假民主為首.” 華記8月28深夜直播視頻有中英文字幕: 煽動顛覆國家政權罪成！支聯會顛覆案自認無錯. 華探長分析詳細內容.
https://rumble.com/v7esetm-convicted-of-incitement-to-subvert-state-power.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vgwbhc/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0pBsHLBnjGNZuLuKncpj5cZhUJ3kDVdTm3rKFqer2eaF6n1wmdWiEG85onB36jKDjl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Full video https://www.youtube.com/live/DsX11mncg0w?is=5OcOltmXBVfKk4y7

Video: The Himalayan Disaster Isn’t Over — A New Lake Is Rising Right Above the Flood Zone 喜馬拉雅災難尚未結束，一座新湖泊正在洪水區正上方形成

Fake news by India on Yarlung Tsangpo River
About China’s Dam Caused Mountain Floods 印度造謠中國大壩引發凹洪雅魯藏布江

https://rumble.com/v7erv5k-the-himalayan-disaster-isnt-over-a-new-lake-is-rising-right-above-the-flood.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vqMNuh/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/ALEVhkT9XZ
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0qNnBKJfcuYBzeEC7X11yVYXD9EghD5CWBCmxgDzwtxQ7hffANWLeVVGsYC4zJcK4l&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

八月二十六日星期三，一場災難性的山洪暴發衝擊了尼泊爾拉蘇瓦縣和中國吉隆縣，造成數百人死亡，並使喜馬拉雅邊境兩側近千人失蹤。但這場災難尚未結束。引發洪水的冰岩崩塌導致大量土石堵塞了林德科拉河流域，一座堰塞湖正在其後方逐漸蓄積。中國水利部表示，該湖泊已經開始溢流，並警告潰堤風險極高，預計最大入流將在九月一日前後到來。尼泊爾災害管理機構則指出，在拉蘇瓦加迪上游還有另一處水域。在本影片中，我們將詳細說明什麼是堰塞湖、「可能潰堤」為何不等於「一定會潰堤」、中國工程人員目前正在進行的處置措施、二〇一八年白格堰塞湖的前例帶給我們的啟示，以及未來七十二小時內需要特別關注的具體徵兆。

A catastrophic flash flood tore through Nepal’s Rasuwa district and China’s Gyirong county on Wednesday, August twenty-sixth, killing hundreds and leaving close to a thousand people missing across both sides of the Himalayan border. But the disaster is not over. The ice-and-rock avalanche that triggered the flood left debris blocking the Lhende Khola river system, and a barrier lake is now filling behind it. China’s Ministry of Water Resources says the lake is already overflowing and warns of a high risk of a breach, with peak inflow expected around September first. Nepal’s disaster authority has flagged a second body of water upstream of Rasuwagadhi. In this video we break down exactly what a barrier lake is, why “could breach” does not mean “will breach,” what Chinese engineers are doing right now, what the twenty eighteen Baige precedent tells us, and the specific signals to watch over the next seventy-two hours.

The current global pause on U.S. immigrant visa processing presents a strategic window for high-net-worth individuals (HNWIs) to engage specialized tax and legal counsel for a thorough reassessment of their applications. By Johnson Choi, MBA, International Business Consultant since 1985

目前美國全球移民簽證處理暫停，為高資產淨值人士提供了一個策略性契機，可委託專業稅務及法律顧問，對其簽證申請進行全面重新評估。作者：蔡永強，工商管理碩士，自1985年起從事國際商業顧問

https://weixin.qq.com/sph/ArXmRUZ50u
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vXRDW4/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid03mpVjf6pt86YnQRoC5kt4NwnZETfg7VyXy4Vz3bm7NYap31GyJ3GJqFnNyvxT4GXl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

對於資產超過1,000萬美元且多數收入來自境外的高資產淨值人士而言，取得美國簽證後，將觸發美國稅務居民身分及全球所得課稅的變更。與香港屬地主義稅制不同，美國不提供資本利得免稅優惠，且其邊際稅率遠高於香港的17%單一稅率。

此外，若此類人士日後選擇放棄綠卡，可能須受美國國稅局（IRS）所轄之離籍稅規則約束。此程序通常需取得國稅局正式核可，並可能須繳納保證金以涵蓋未來潛在稅務負債。

相對而言，財務資源較少的個人可能會因美國的公共援助計畫而覺得美國具吸引力。然而，必須注意的是，這些福利的資格受嚴格的收入審查及美國「公眾負擔」不得入境規則所規範，而該規則在移民審查程序中扮演關鍵角色。一旦獲准，許多人便選擇「躺平」，每月領取數千美元福利（含現金），終身享用。

For HNWIs with assets exceeding US$10 million and the majority of their income derived from foreign sources, obtaining a U.S. visa triggers a shift to U.S. tax residency and worldwide income taxation. Unlike Hong Kong’s territorial tax system, the U.S. does not offer exemptions on capital gains and imposes marginal rates that are substantially higher than Hong Kong’s 17% flat rate.

Furthermore, should such individuals later choose to relinquish their green card, they may become subject to U.S. expatriation tax rules administered by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This process often requires formal IRS clearance and may involve posting a security deposit to cover potential future tax liabilities.

In contrast, individuals with fewer financial resources may find the U.S. attractive due to its public assistance programs. However, it is important to note that eligibility for these benefits is strictly governed by means-testing and the U.S. public charge inadmissibility rules, which play a critical role in the immigration review process. Once approved, many are laying flat receiving thousands of benefits including cash each month for the rest of their lives!

Hong Kong Again Surpasses Singapore – Asia No. 1
亞洲No.1 香港再力壓新加坡
蟬聯亞洲最頂尖國際城市商業與經濟表現續居首位
Remains Asia’s Top International City
Continues to Rank First in Business and Economic Performance
資料來源：《亞洲城市國際化指數2026》Source: Asia Cities Internationalization Index 2026
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AWxTnkRQf2
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vQCoPo/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0gmMvKGd9dgHqcJvHh2dnNw285au63fNAwCeafeep5mhKEWpvSRbFCTZRbpyaADa7l&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr

Video: What China Learned From America’s Biggest Mistake (How It’s Using It Against US) 視頻有中英文字幕: 中國從美國最大錯誤中學到了什麼（以及它如何用來對付美國）

https://rumble.com/v7eqtn8-what-china-learned-from-americas-biggest-mistake.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8vQYMs8/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid06WwP3i7MgLa1rciCPrvAhFYULe4f8CDjv9cH8EtGJhfig6hTq8GM4nGrjXsFXLUwl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Full video https://youtu.be/kZaSk6osgtw?is=IGL95lvyCO6vMeu0

「你應該把我們的課程大綱寄給他們，」一位前聯準會經濟學家在波士頓和我喝咖啡時說道。「因為北京早就有了。」他不是在開玩笑。美國寫下了金融崩潰的教科書。而中國是唯一真正研讀過它的國家。

二十五年來，北京解剖了美國三大失敗——二〇〇八年金融危機、網路泡沫，以及華盛頓共識的崩潰。這部影片將帶你了解他們從這些解剖中建構出的三大原則、如今保護著全球五分之一人口的六層經濟架構，以及那場靜靜地讓華盛頓付出比任何關稅戰都更高代價的認知不對稱。手冊，對比回憶錄。

“You should send them our syllabus,” a former Federal Reserve economist told me over coffee in Boston. “Because Beijing already has it.” He wasn’t joking. America wrote the textbook on financial collapse. China is the only country that actually studied it.

For twenty-five years, Beijing autopsied America’s three biggest failures — the 2008 crisis, the dot-com bubble, and the collapse of the Washington Consensus. This video walks through the three doctrines they built from those autopsies, the six-layer economic architecture now shielding one-fifth of humanity, and the cognitive asymmetry quietly costing Washington more than any tariff war ever will. Manuals versus memoirs.