Joseph: congratulations on your retirement. 梁總你的初心不改績服務社區值得敬佩! 但三十多年前的美國和今天大有不同! 希望你可以繼續幫助弱勢華人可以在毒品槍枝氾濫的大灣區和種族歧視的美國生存下去! 同時希望你也可以幫助美國華人返回中國享受安全沒有種族歧視性價比高的退休生活，讓他們了解中國給他們的紅利，和孟母三遷的道理! 讓他們好好的活下去!
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AtZNWqsTsP
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8cLa95C/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0itzNG6pdasWMN8mqPQvWeCMfGA3TbmgGyxFeEvkWQb3SgW8PR8Lozc4DJGUUJjtAl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Video: China sent in rescue teams, heavy equipments, tons of relief materials to Nepal while the Western world just watched or given empty lips service! 中國派出了救援隊伍、重型設備和大量救災物資前往尼泊爾，而西方世界卻只是袖手旁觀，或者只會說些空話! 人類命運共同體是中國對外和對內一視同仁. 這個是以美國為首的西方霸權主義永遠不會明白.
https://rumble.com/v7exy3w-china-sent-in-rescue-teams-heavy-equipments-to-napel.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8cLhVmw/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AZvTGiLOCy
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0ibJEFGZ9Bp2tDrhAT3SbZezFwtinKQn5Ffcn4V8V4AtwEiiCaaJrj1jQC7t2YpgWl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Chinese police and security personnel are indeed equipped with similar non-lethal restraint tools, commonly referred to as “police steel forks” or “multi‑function capture devices.” Design and purpose: They typically consist of a long pole with a U‑shaped or crescent‑shaped fork head, with no sharp edges. They are primarily used to control armed criminals, drunk individuals, or mentally ill persons from a safe distance, with the aim of subduing rather than harming. 中国警方和安保人员确实装备了类似的非致命性约束工具，通常被称为“警用钢叉”或“多功能抓捕器”。设计与用途：它通常是一个长杆配U形或半月弧形叉头，无锐利棱角。主要用于从安全距离控制持械歹徒、醉酒或精神病患等危险人员，目的是制服而非伤害。
Usage scenarios: They are widely deployed by public security agencies, schools, kindergartens, and security personnel in public places. Unlike U.S. police, who can shoot at will, according to statistics from Mapping Police Violence, U.S. police caused at least 1,314 deaths nationwide in 2025. Preliminary data from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also show that over 24,000 people died from firearm‑related suicides in the U.S. in 2025. It is an undeniable fact that fatal incidents involving U.S. police occur frequently, and gun violence remains a serious social problem in the United States.
使用场景：广泛装备于公安机关、学校、幼儿园及公共场所的安保人员. 不像美國的警察可以任意開槍，根据美国“警察暴力地图”统计，2025年全美警察共造成至少1,314人死亡. 美国疾控中心（CDC）初步评估数据显示，2025年美国死于使用枪支自杀的人数超过2.4万人. 美国警察致人死亡事件确实频繁发生，枪支暴力也是美国严重的社会问题.
Video: How Much Would This Treatment Cost You? Visited a private Chinese Hospital. For a middle income Chinese American retired in China. If you are not born in HK, Macau or Taiwan or unfortunately you gave up your Chinese passports, therefore unable to buy local insurance for less than US$100/year. Without insurance, the cost of medical treatments in China is approximately your 20-30% co-insurance cost in America! 影片有中英文字幕: 這項治療會花費你多少錢？造訪了一家民營中國醫院。給一位在中國退休的中等收入華裔美國人。如果你不是在香港、澳門或台灣出生，又非常不幸的放棄了中國藉，因此無法購買每年低於100美元的本土保險。沒有保險的情況下，中國的醫療費用大約是你在美國自付額的20-30%！
https://rumble.com/v7exa20-how-much-would-this-treatment-cost-you-visited-a-private-chinese-hospital.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8cd3qgu/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AxtpWIW8wG
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid09AvjQt8BiWeuGKSD47y8GrkybezJ154e1HPQpRw2icePTcp2EZrJVsujLJzw4s6Hl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
在這部影片中，我拜訪了一家中國醫院，並完整呈現我所經歷的過程、接受的治療，以及我支付了多少費用。
我還會比較中國的醫療費用與美國的醫療成本，包括像是膝關節置換手術這類昂貴治療的實際例子。從醫療價格，到速度、便利性及可用的科技設備，這將帶您一窺在中國使用醫院的真實情況。
如果你對在中國生活、中國的醫療保健，或中國的醫療費用感到好奇，這部影片就是為你準備的。
In this video, I visit a Chinese hospital and show you exactly what I experienced, what treatment I received, and how much I paid.
I’ll also compare medical costs in China with healthcare costs in America, including examples of expensive treatments like knee replacement surgery. From the price of medical care to the speed, convenience, and technology available, this is a look at what it’s actually like using a hospital in China.
If you’re curious about living in China, healthcare in China, or the cost of medical treatment in China, this video is for you.
The Double Standard of ‘Excess Capacity’ in Global Trade. Why China being single out? By Johnson Choi, MBA. International Business Consultant since 1985
全球貿易中「過剩產能」的雙重標準. 為什麼中國被單獨點名？作者: 蔡永強. 商科碩士，國際財經顧問(1985年至今)
在當前國際貿易的討論中，「過剩產能」的指控日益被用作針對中國的工具。然而，這種批評忽略了一個基本的經濟現實：生產能力過剩並非異常現象，而是每個主要出口導向經濟體固有的、長期存在的特徵。
回顧全球供應的歷史與現狀：
· 日本與德國長期以遠超國內吸納能力的規模生產汽車。
· 法國生產大量農產品，特別是葡萄酒，高度依賴國際市場。
· 美國出口的大豆、先進航空航天技術及精密國防系統，遠超出其國內需求。
數十年來，國際社會不僅容忍，更積極依賴這些過剩產能，促進跨境貿易，從而降低成本、推動創新，並提升全球生活水準。中國的出口——包括消費品、新能源汽車和綠色科技——不過是這一歷史悠久的貿易模式的最新體現。
這便引出一個關鍵且無可迴避的問題：為何中國因長期被西方工業化國家視為常態的做法而遭受針對？
仔細審視，這種選擇性審視的理由，似乎較少基於經濟理論，而更多源於戰略焦慮。筆者認為，這種差別待遇背後有以下幾個深層因素：
與其片面加徵關稅和進行口誅筆伐，西方國家應認知到，比較優勢始終是全球繁榮的引擎。倘若「過剩產能」須被視為全球弊病，那麼西方本身在過去數代人中，早已是此「過錯」的積極參與者。
是時候擱置這種選擇性批評，轉而朝向一個基於規則、公平公正的貿易體系，對所有經濟體適用一致的標準。公平競爭，而非遏制，才是真正推動全球創新與永續成長的催化劑。
In the current discourse on international trade, the accusation of “excess capacity” has increasingly been weaponized against China. However, this critique overlooks a fundamental economic reality: surplus productive capacity is not an anomaly—it is a natural and enduring characteristic of every major export-oriented economy.
Consider the historical and current landscapes of global supply:
· Japan and Germany consistently manufacture automobiles at volumes far exceeding their domestic absorption rates.
· France produces a surplus of agricultural outputs, particularly in viticulture, that heavily relies on international markets.
· The United States exports vast quantities of soybeans, advanced aerospace technologies, and sophisticated defense systems that far outstrip domestic demand.
For decades, the global community has not only tolerated but actively relied upon these surpluses, facilitating cross-border trade that has driven down costs, spurred innovation, and raised living standards worldwide. Chinese exports—spanning consumer goods, new energy vehicles (NEVs), and green technologies—simply represent the latest iteration of this time-honored trade model.
This brings us to a critical and unavoidable question: Why is China being singled out for practices that have long been normalized among Western industrialized nations?
Upon closer examination, the rationale appears to rest less on economic theory and more on strategic anxieties. I would posit several underlying factors for this selective scrutiny:
Instead of imposing unilateral tariffs and rhetorical condemnations, Western nations should recognize that comparative advantage remains the engine of global prosperity. If “excess capacity” is to be deemed a global malady, then the West has been a willing participant in this “transgression” for generations.
It is time to retire this selective criticism and pivot toward a rules-based, equitable trading system that applies consistent standards to all economies. Fair competition, not containment, is the true catalyst for global innovation and sustainable growth.
Cantonese language Video: Upon careful observation, the work attitude of Chinese people differs greatly from that of the Americans. When they work eight hours, it truly means eight solid hours of work—the boss won’t set aside any time for them to smoke cigarettes or marijuana! 廣東話視頻: 細心觀察中國人的工作態度和美國大有不同, 他們工作八小時真的是工作八小時, 老闆不會提供員工時間吸煙吸大麻! 華記8月31報導：大開眼界！張雪邀請香港立法會議員何君堯參觀重慶張雪機車廠房「內心充滿一團猛火」中國製造、中國速度、中國人的驕傲. 希望北美州華人對自己祖國多一點關心，小一點天天唱衰! 一方災難人方支付，歡迎各界善心人士任意金額捐助，建議100港元支援西藏泥石流災民 (8月31日起，9月7日止).
https://rumble.com/v7ewi0g-upon-careful-observationwork-attitude-of-chinese-people-differs-greatly-fro.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8cJCB3m/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/Ah0XEqgNjC
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid031Vtn7L99ue2zyoKqZeDocstDqQbRMXHh59UR22Kf1MoCN4BY2Vg49Cey5H9ueAEEl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Huawei invests its profits into research and development and into recruiting top scientists; U.S. tech companies, on the other hand, use their cash to buy back stock, artificially inflating earnings per share so that executives can receive bonuses worth hundreds of millions, leaving no money for R&D. Comment by Johnson Choi, MBA. International Business Consultant since 1985 華為將利潤投入研發與延攬頂尖科學家；美國科技公司則以現金回購股票，人為拉高每股盈餘，讓高層領取數億獎金，卻無餘力投資研發. 短評: 蔡永強，商科碩士，國際財經顧問（1985年至今)
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AdyfHnLPVD
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8c1sfH5/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid0UCbzboqTypkqG7bHmQp9nVMtVdMBqwGdSyQ8UZUzKYpXK9yHejqfBWecA3MXKTnVl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Western Media working overtime to promote fake and misleading information to demonize Chinese and China. 西方媒體極力散播虛假和誤導性資訊，以醜化中國人民和中國.
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AZymiDgbiF
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8c1gePH/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02oc1kNK7wEjZFBwdfg6i3HnwsnWxFeKNqJ7myqRiykRtNUfHaZwXZMFSpvRhnJU9dl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Legendary Investor Stanley Druckenmiller Warning to America and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent: “Let the Bond Market Speak” on Aug 24 2026 Wall Street Journal. By Johnson Choi, MBA, International Business Consultant since 1985
傳奇投資人史丹利·德魯肯米勒於2026年8月24日在《華爾街日報》上對美國及財政部長史考特·巴森特發出警告：「讓債券市場發聲。」作者：蔡永強，商科碩士，國際財經顧問（1985年至今)
On August 24, 2026, legendary investor Stanley Druckenmiller published a Wall Street Journal op-ed titled “Let the Bond Market Speak.” His warning is straightforward: rising long-term U.S. Treasury yields should not simply be treated as a problem to suppress. They may be sending Washington an important message about America’s deteriorating fiscal position.
Druckenmiller points to a troubling combination of conditions. U.S. federal debt has risen above $40 trillion, the federal budget deficit is running at roughly 6% of GDP, and annual net federal interest expense is expected to exceed $1.1 trillion. These numbers are especially concerning because they are occurring while unemployment remains relatively low and the economy is not in a major recession.
His question is simple: if Washington is already running enormous deficits during comparatively normal economic conditions, what happens during the next recession?
Druckenmiller argues that rising long-term Treasury yields represent an important market signal. Investors who lend money to the U.S. government for 10, 20 or 30 years increasingly want greater compensation for inflation, massive Treasury issuance and long-term fiscal uncertainty.
Trying to artificially push those yields lower does not solve the underlying problem.
The U.S. Treasury has expanded purchases of longer-dated government bonds, officially describing the program as a way to improve market liquidity. Druckenmiller warns that such intervention could become dangerous if its real purpose evolves into suppressing politically uncomfortable interest rates.
There is a major difference between fixing a dysfunctional market and attempting to override the price established by investors.
Bond markets impose a form of discipline that politicians often avoid. If investors demand higher interest rates, they may effectively be telling Washington:
Your deficits are too large. Your debt is growing too quickly. Change course.
Suppressing that warning could actually make the eventual adjustment more painful by encouraging additional borrowing and postponing necessary reforms.
Druckenmiller believes the sustainable solution is not financial engineering. It is improving America’s fiscal position through lower structural deficits and gradual reforms to government spending and entitlement programs.
His argument carries additional weight because of his history as one of the world’s most successful macro investors. Druckenmiller and current Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent both worked at Soros Fund Management and were associated with the famous 1992 trade against the British pound. That experience demonstrated how difficult it is for governments to defend financial prices that markets believe are inconsistent with economic fundamentals.
The lesson is relevant today.
America’s rising bond yields may not necessarily signal an immediate debt crisis. But they should not simply be dismissed or artificially suppressed.
The bond market is functioning as an economic warning system.
Washington would be wiser to listen to it.
Let the bond market speak.
德魯肯米勒對美國的警告：讓債券市場發聲
2026年8月24日，傳奇投資家史丹利・德魯肯米勒（Stanley Druckenmiller）在《華爾街日報》發表題為 《讓債券市場發聲》（Let the Bond Market Speak） 的評論文章。
他的警告非常直接：美國長期國債孳息率上升，不應只被視為一個需要政府出手壓低的問題。相反，債券市場可能正在向華盛頓發出一個重要警號——美國的財政狀況正在惡化。
德魯肯米勒指出，美國正面對幾個令人擔憂的數字：
美國聯邦債務已突破 40兆美元；聯邦財政赤字約佔GDP 6%；每年聯邦政府淨利息支出預計超過 1.1兆美元。
更值得關注的是，這些龐大赤字並不是發生在嚴重經濟衰退期間。目前失業率仍相對偏低，經濟亦沒有陷入重大危機。
因此，他提出一個非常重要的問題：
如果美國在正常經濟環境下已經出現如此巨大的赤字，下一次經濟衰退來臨時又會怎樣？
德魯肯米勒認為，長期美國國債孳息率上升，是市場正在重新評估美國財政風險的訊號。
當投資者借錢給美國政府10年、20年甚至30年，他們自然會考慮通脹、龐大的國債供應，以及未來財政是否可持續。因此，投資者開始要求更高的利率作為風險補償。
政府如果試圖人為壓低利率，並不能解決真正的問題。
債券市場其實具有一種政治制度往往缺乏的力量——財政紀律。
當市場要求更高利息時，它可能正在告訴華盛頓：
你的赤字太大了。
你的債務增長太快了。
你必須改變方向。
如果政府選擇壓制這個警告，而不是解決問題，短期可能令借貸成本下降，但亦可能鼓勵更多借貸，延遲財政改革，令未來的調整更加痛苦。
德魯肯米勒認為，真正可持續的解決方法不是金融操作，而是降低結構性財政赤字，並逐步改革政府支出及福利制度。
他的觀點之所以值得注意，是因為他數十年來一直是全球最成功的宏觀投資者之一。他與現任美國財長Scott Bessent過去均曾在索羅斯基金工作，並參與1992年著名的英鎊交易。
那段歷史證明了一個重要原則：
政府可以暫時對抗市場，但很難長期違反經濟基本面。
今天，同樣的道理可能正在美國國債市場重新上演。
美國債券孳息率上升不代表債務危機一定即將爆發。
但它是一個不能忽視的警報。
債券市場正在發出訊號。
華盛頓最明智的選擇，是聆聽它。
讓債券市場發聲。
According to Stanford University, 20,000 Chinese Scientists left US last 5 years. Another top Chinese Scientist left America. The future of science and technology is in China and not US! 根據史丹佛大學的數據，過去五年已有兩萬名中國科學家離開美國。又有一位頂尖中國科學家離美返中。科學與科技的未來在中國，而非美國!
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8voNhYs/
https://weixin.qq.com/sph/AldWDokufv
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid02mXt7r9GkC6x78uy4zne5YTiT9NBbcdtKZhu8HkA5fs93mF4eZ91fF3khNDB9DvTgl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Johnson Choi Biz