First she absolutely obliterated ASPI’s paper claiming Uygurs were being sold into slave labor, and now she has a new report showing that two allegedly credible human rights groups, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International, have also released reports claiming mass human rights abuses in Xinjiang with absolutely zero evidence, effectively relying on the “trust me, bro” tactic and their good names to spread lies.
Just last month the US enacted a bill banning the import of goods from Xinjiang, unless companies there can prove they aren’t guilty of slave labor. You can watch my video on that in the link below. Now, Australian Jaq James, an independent Western propaganda analyst and international law advocate, is worried Australia could pass a similar law.
She reached out to then-Australian senator Rex Patrick who had introduced a private members’ bill proposing an Aussie ban on the import of Uygur-made goods and asked him what his evidence was of slave labor and other human rights abuses in Xinjiang. The senator admitted he was swayed by numerous reports, including ASPI’s already debunked and trashed report, and expressed that he was absolutely confident that mass human rights abuses were taking place.
Although he didn’t mention which reports specifically, James decided to legally analyze two influential reports, one by Amnesty International and one by Human Rights Watch, and found they are both fundamentally flawed, lack any credible evidence, and literally need to be thrown in the bin.
Today I’ll list my Top 5 arguments against these papers, but I seriously suggest you read James’ paper, titled “Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch’s Forced Xinjiang Labor Claims: Junk Research or Noble Cause Corruption?”, which I will link below. The paper not only thoroughly debunks these two supposedly credible human rights groups, but goes as far as to argue that these groups are undeserving of the public’s trust and need to undergo massive reform.
Spain’s member of parliament Gerardo Pisarello said the NATO summit was organized to “enrichen the weapons trade” and “reinforce the geostrategic priorities of the United States … above all to weaken China.” He condemned US “vassalage,” calling for a new “autonomous” European security model based on respect for the Global South.
Video: Spot on… the 15 worst leaders in the world today… this clip is so right on the mark, I’d like to add a table of contents to it 發現…當今世界上最糟糕的 15 位領導者…這個剪輯非常正確, 我想在其中添加一個目錄 and make a few adjustment in some of their name (marked with *) as commonly used on www.
“Boris Johnson is already a political corpse. And he will drag the whole country to the grave with him,” writes The Guardian 鮑里斯·約翰遜已經是一具政治屍體. 他將與他一起將整個英國拖入墳墓,”衛報報導
The authors hope that Johnson will leave soon, and the catastrophe will not come, but this is not a reason to relax. After all, the damage has already been done, and the crisis has already come and it is already impossible to get out of this pit.
Together with Johnson, neighbors from Scandinavia, who now all of a sudden urgently need to join NATO, are pulling their countries into the abyss.
Previously, they were set as an example as countries with the most balanced policy, and now they are throwing their people into the inferno of the global crisis, depriving them of an invaluable advantage in the form of neutrality.