BRITISH ‘DEMOCRACY’ Vs HONG KONG ‘UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE’ 英國「民主」對比香港「普選」
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8GJ7cQv/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid03PqGgQJmbfsuy7sFphE211e34egwUoBRmCSydPw3sinPL9GoV6XWU6P4UoAzbawRl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
英國「民主」
- 一小撮精英集團選擇他們想要統治的人。（人民沒有發言權。）
- 一小撮精英集團要求民選的首相辭職。（人民沒有發言權。）
- 一小撮精英集團發現他們選定的人必須先成為國會議員，於是他們促成了這件事。（人民沒有發言權。）
- 一小撮精英集團告訴人民誰將是他們的領導人。（人民沒有發言權。）
類似情況在英國屢次發生。
香港「普選」——現在將此與北京於2013年提供給香港的普選制度相比較。
- 由各主要政黨組成的人民代表選舉團，提出候選人名單。
- 每位合法公民擁有兩票，一票投給其地方代表，一票投給香港的整體領導人。
- 立法會（香港議會）的所有席位，包括最高職位，均由民主方式選出的人士擔任。
（北京支持的香港普選方案當時獲得公眾支持，但卻被某群政治人物離奇地否決了。這導致回歸英國殖民時期的混合制度。我們現在知道，否決該方案的人得到了美國政治干預團體的支持。）
- Small elite group chooses person they want to rule. (The people get no say.)
- Small elite group tells democratically elected Prime Minster to resign. (The people get no say.)
- Small elite group notices that their chosen man needs to be MP first, so they make that happen. (The people get no say.)
- Small elite group tells the people who will be their leader. (The people get no say.)
Similar scenarios have happened REPEATEDLY in the UK.
HONG KONG ‘UNIVERSAL SUFFRAGE’ – Now compare that with the system of universal suffrage that Beijing offered Hong Kong in 2013.
- Electoral college of people’s representatives, made up of all major parties, puts forward a selection of candidates.
- Every legal citizen gets two votes, one for their local representative, one for the overall leader of Hong Kong.
- All seats in the Legislative Council (Hong Kong’s parliament) go to democratically elected people, including the top job.
(The Beijing-endorsed universal suffrage system proposed for Hong Kong was popular with the public, but it was, bizarrely, rejected by a certain group of politicians. This caused a return to the British colonial mixed system. We now know the people who rejected it were supported by US political interference groups.)
Johnson Choi Biz 