Video: In the past, when the U.S. sanctioned China, China could only tough it out; but today, if the U.S. wants to strike again, why doesn’t it dare?

Video: In the past, when the U.S. sanctioned China, China could only tough it out; but today, if the U.S. wants to strike again, why doesn’t it dare? 影片有中英文字幕: 以前美國制裁中國，中國只能硬扛；今天再想下手，美國為什麼不敢了!

https://rumble.com/v7bgto0-in-the-past-when-the-u.s.-sanctioned-china-china-could-only-tough-it-out.html
https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8spetER/
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=pfbid022bCEy46jWtXyQX49PjUnSEHcQrZB5p1PagaiVayim3bVHGbibsWNktYH4nQQCb1Sl&id=100036400039778&mibextid=wwXIfr
Full video: https://youtu.be/UxjCugF9wjU?is=qr5oltGylVvnZ3nW

美國最尷尬的地方是什麼？不是不想制裁，而是發現過去“一按按鈕就讓別人疼”的制裁機器，打到中國身上，開始嚴重反噬了。
以前美國拿刀，別人流血；今天美國拿刀，得先看看刀柄是不是連著自己的手。從華為事件到新能源的全面崛起，美國本想用斷供讓中國低頭，卻逼著中國把“自主可控”變成了國家級共識。這是一場成本的重新計算，也是世界規則發生根本改變的信號。

What is the most awkward part for the U.S.? It’s not that it doesn’t want to sanction—it’s that it has discovered that the sanction machine that used to “make others hurt at the push of a button” has started to backfire severely when turned on China.

In the past, when the U.S. wielded the knife, others bled; today, when the U.S. wields the knife, it has to first check whether the handle is still attached to its own hand. From the Huawei incident to the full-scale rise of new energy, the U.S. tried to bring China to its knees by cutting off supplies, but instead forced China to turn “self-reliance and controllability” into a national consensus. This is a recalculation of costs, and also a signal that the world’s rules are undergoing a fundamental shift.