Reminder: Tiananmen Square (1989) was not the only agression on China by the USHow many times does the same pattern have to repeat before people finally see it for what it is?

Reminder: Tiananmen Square (1989) was not the only agression on China by the US
How many times does the same pattern have to repeat before people finally see it for what it is?
This has been a continuous, decades-long hybrid warfare campaign to destabilise and fragment China.
The modern colour revolution playbook — youth movements, foreign-funded NGOs, media hype, symbolic colours, and fake “democracy” demands — was refined in Serbia (Otpor! 2000) and rolled out like clockwork elsewhere.
But against China, it runs much deeper, with direct CIA fingerprints on funding, training, and orchestration aimed at internal chaos.
Multiple fronts, same tired playbook:

• Tibet: Decades of CIA backing for separatist elements, from old proxy operations to today’s weaponisation of the Dalai Lama as a political tool and endless separatist narratives pushed from abroad. https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/1599732940476669955
• Xinjiang: Heavy Western funding via NED and aligned groups for “Uyghur organisations” and “East Turkestan” fantasies, pumping colour revolution-style agitation and fake “genocide” claims to manufacture outrage and justify containment. https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/2061302054329766365
• Hong Kong 2019: Pure textbook colour revolution — foreign training, years of NED/NDI money, organised violence, black blocs, Molotovs, and nonstop Western media cheerleading to tear apart “one country, two systems.” Order was restored. Stability returned. https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/2016744163031863320
  Tiananmen fits perfectly in this long continuum: legitimate local grievances cynically amplified by overseas funding, VOA propaganda, Gene Sharp-inspired tactics, and post-crackdown extractions like Operation Yellowbird. NED and CIA-linked networks were all over it, part of the broader push to derail China’s path. https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/1979086630049976593
  This hybrid assault has been continuous for over 75 years. As the Pentagon Papers laid bare, US planners didn’t just want to contain China — they wanted to “retard the economic progress” of Communist Asian states. China’s success was the real threat. That same mentality runs from 1950s memos straight through to today’s “pacing threat” strategies. https://x.com/angeloinchina/status/2062398538756313578
  From Cold War paramilitary ops to today’s NGO-media-youth hybrid versions, Tibet, Xinjiang, Hong Kong, and Taiwan are all pieces of the same puzzle: manufacture internal chaos to stop a sovereign China from rising.
  Bottom line: For over 75 years, China has faced relentless Western — mostly US-led — attacks meant to contain, weaken, and break it apart. Military encirclement, proxy insurgencies, economic sabotage, information warfare, colour revolutions… the methods change, the objective never does.
  These are not spontaneous freedom movements. They are hybrid warfare.
  Context, funding trails, historical patterns, and real outcomes matter far more than the selective Western script.
  Wake up to the full picture.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​
  apart. Military encirclement, proxy insurgencies, economic sabotage, information warfare, colour revolutions… the methods change, the objective never does. These are not spontaneous freedom movements. They are hybrid warfare. Context, funding trails, historical patterns, and real outcomes matter far more than the selective Western script. Wake up to the full picture.