AngloSaxon fantasy: 6 billions people to serve AngloSaxon Country Club’s 1 billion members. 西人狂想曲: 全球60億人口替西人鄉村俱樂部的10億會員服務. The rise of China has completely destroyed AngloSaxon fantasy. 中國掘起毀了西人鄕村俱樂部的春秋大夢. People of Colors resided inside the AngloSaxon country club countries are granted 2rd or 3rd class membership status, also known as 2nd or 3rd class citizenships. 居住在西人鄉村俱樂部國家內的有色人種被授予二等或三等會員身份, 也稱為二等或三等公民. AngloSaxon country club members are very upset trying to use the same tactics in the past successfully brought Germany, USSR and Japan to their knees, but failed. 白人鄉村俱樂部成員很不高興, 試圖用過去同樣的戰術成功地讓德國, 蘇聯和日本屈服, 但失敗了.
Pseudo-court on Xinjiang ‘a farce’ by Liu Xin Jun 04 2021
Filled with one-sided voices and fabricated stories of so-called “victims” that are hard to verify, the latest farce that tries to label China for committing “genocide” in its Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region – the “Uyghur Tribunal” – began its “hearing” in London on Friday. Being neither a legitimate legal body nor having the authority to review “genocide” accusations against a country, the “tribunal” only exposes the malicious purpose of anti-China forces behind the event, analysts said.
Qelbinur Sidik, the first so-called victim from China’s Xinjiang, sat in front of a number of “counsels” and “experts,” telling her stories of being a “teacher” in the re-education center and “witnessing” almost all “crimes” that seem to fit the malicious imaginations of the West to the training centers in Xinjiang, from torturing to forced sterilization–and, of course, death.
With pictures of satellite images of “re-education” centers waiting for her to display and tissues putting ahead of Qelbinur’s “touching” narration, reasonable people will question “If people are strictly oppressed in the centers as Qelbinur claimed, how could she see all the torturing?”
Omir Bekali, another “victim,” brought a chain to the “hearing” and said [through translation] that it was the chain that was used on him in Xinjiang for seven months. But later after the chair questioned how he got the chain, Omir said he bought it online.
Like Qelbinur and Omir, many “victims” came to the Friday “tribunal” with their stories full of loopholes and contradictions. At a press conference on May 25, the Xinjiang regional government exposed the lies of these “victims.”
Established in September 2020 in the UK upon request of the World Uyghur Congress (WUC), a US-funded secessionist network, the “Uyghur Tribunal” is a “pseudo” one that follows the presumption of guilt and serves anti-China forces’ smears on Xinjiang, analysts said.
The “tribunal” is not a legitimate legal body nor does it have the right to review “genocide” accusations, Zhu Ying, deputy director of the National Human Rights Education and Training Base of Southwest University of Political Science and Law, told the Global Times.
As the most serious crime, genocide is a well-defined term under the UN Genocide Convention, international laws and related cases, and the most respected international tribunals have agreed that proof of the crime of genocide depends on an extremely convincing presentation of factual evidence.
After the Convention was established in 1948, main cases on genocide were judged by an international court established under the Convention or special court authorized by the UN Security Council, Zhu said.
“No judge or credible lawyer who cherish their reputations would be engaged in such a farce aimed at political hype,” Zhu said.
Geoffrey Nice, an anti-China British barrister, is the founder and chair of the tribunal. The Global Times also found out that the main members of the fake tribunal have working experience on the “China Tribunal,” which was commissioned by the International Coalition to End Transplant Abuse in China (ETAC). The ETAC is connected to Falun Gong, a cult banned by the Chinese government.
Zhu said that these anti-China groups are playing the tactics in processing some certain case under Anglo-American law system-setting a simulated trial to collect cases and testimonies, drawing public attention using various means, including shooting films or documentaries and pressing the official court to take part and make a final judgment.
Graham Perry, a British solicitor and international arbitrator, called the “tribunal” an anti-China event and people behind it want to convict China of the charge of genocide without even reviewing evidence.
Perry said that evidence is key to genocide cases. However, most of the evidence presented were from the WUC and Adrian Zenz, an uncredited and right-wing individual. Organizations that have supported Zenz have encouraged these independent testimonies.
There is no genocide, no forced labor and no sterilization in Xinjiang. The current “genocide” accusation on Xinjiang is about geopolitics played by white countries, the US and the West in particular, the British lawyer said.
“Despite the satellites flying overhead, they’ve got no evidence from Xinjiang… without a murder, without deaths, without crematoriums, without executions, without refugees, without a stream of people running away from Xinjiang seeking safety outside… they call this genocide?” Perry said.
He noted the previous legal opinion given by the Essex Court Chambers, which said China committed “genocide” in Xinjiang. “The evidence they offered is very poor” but Prime Minister Boris Johnson need it as a lever with China.
Johnson wants more of China – he wants more trade as he has pulled Britain out of the European Union and he is having trouble making a trade deal with America. Boris welcomes the opportunity of closer economic relations with China. But at the same time, he is being urged to stand up to China, it is said on the Uygur issue, Perry said.
Zhu said that the British government has taken a prudent and blurry attitude toward the “tribunal.” “When people from China criticize it for supporting an anti-China farce and undermining China-UK ties, it could shift responsibility to NGOs or individuals. But it is turning a blind eye to law violators.”
China has reportedly replaced Germany as the UK’s biggest single import market for the first time. Goods from China to the UK increased by 66% since the start of 2018 to ￡6.9 billion ($23.8 billion）in the first quarter of 2021, the Guardian reported.
The tribunal does not meet the criteria for a non-governmental organization either, as it does not conform to the UK’s Charities Act 2011. It claims to work for Uygurs amid the “Chinese governments’ violence,” but the goal is not based on verified facts, and the tribunal has no clear regulatory articles or trusteeship council. Those conditions prove the tribunal has no legal validity.
香港慶祝美國六四顏色革命顛覆活動失敗 Hong Kong Celebrates China’s successfully put down US’s NED/CIA color revolution subversive activities at Tiananmen Square on June 4, 1989 in the name of fake freedom, democracy and human rights. https://vimeo.com/558642345 https://vimeo.com/557806591 美國加州舊金山世界日報, World Journal Newspaper San Francisco, June 4, 2021
Why CPC strong leadership key to leading China over crucial test, en route to rejuvenation through 100 years by Yang Sheng, Chen Qingqing and Cao Siqi Jun 03 2021
A visitor looks at statues of earlier generations of revolutionaries at the site of the First National Congress of the CPC in Shanghai on Thursday when restoration at the site finished and it is reopened to the public as a museum.
Editor’s Note:
With the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China (CPC) less than a month away, the Global Times will publish a series of reports to decode why the CPC is the destined choice for the Chinese people, why it can rise above challenges and tests in a century, and what is its secret code to success in governing such a vast country and implementing effective economic policies that have created an economic miracle for China and the world.
The current series will be divided into two parts to explore how the CPC withstood storm after storm and overcame crisis after crisis and how firm leadership becomes the key to the CPC’s success. This is the first part of the current series, which focuses on how the CPC has overcome serious challenges and gone through tests one by one in the history. The second part, which will be published on Saturday, will start from the internal and external challenges the Party was faced with in the 1980s.
People take photos in front of the site of the First National Congress of the CPC in Shanghai on April 23, 2021.
The Communist Party of China (CPC) and the Chinese people are gearing up for grand celebrations for the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Party on July 1 – a truly remarkable milestone for the CPC and the over 1.4 billion Chinese people.
Around the world, political parties with more than 100 years’ history are not rare, but almost none could claim the achievements the CPC has made. Through a series of crucial tests and crises, the CPC has emerged even stronger and more confident, leading a torn-apart, poverty-stricken nation out of its darkest moments to a world-leading power today en route for a great national rejuvenation.
In the past 100 years, the CPC experienced several “darkest hours” in its centurial journey, including the Kuomintang (KMT)’s massacre of CPC members in the 1920s, the setback caused by the Cultural Revolution from the 1960s to 1970s, and the impact of Western ideology in the late 1980s.
Today, experts and scholars are trying to find out what is the key for the Party to overcome those challenges through wise decision-making and self-correction, to prevent a collapse and failure like other communist parties in some former socialist countries, and make China a powerful, successful and confident country that makes the West, which used to have unshakable confidence and supremacy, more and more anxious.
Before the founding of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in 1949, also called the era of revolution, the CPC also experienced serious crises such as the April 12 Counter-revolutionary Coup (also known as the Shanghai massacre) in 1927 when the KMT regime killed thousands of CPC members, and the failure of the campaign against “encirclement and suppression” launched by the KMT regime in 1933. In these “darkest hours,” the CPC almost lost more than half of its strength and even risked almost being completely destroyed by the KMT regime.
Before the Zunyi Conference in 1935 which confirmed Mao Zedong’s military leadership of the Red Army, the Party didn’t have a strong leadership core, and the revolution suffered setbacks and tragedies. The Zunyi Conference brought a changeover for the CPC, and overturned the failing tendency.
This proved that the Party leadership with a strong core is essential to ensure the victory and prevent failure, said experts.
Analysts and scholars of Party history said that there are some key similarities or lessons that could be highlighted from these crises – some leaders or elites of the Party held wishful thinking and compromised their stance toward the enemies of the Party and the Chinese people; they blindly attached too much hope on the experiences and thoughts from other countries, and heavily relied on foreign advisors without self-developed ideas based on China’s unique national conditions; and the decision-making board was not united and leaders shared no consensus on the path of the revolution and made wrong judgments on China’s national condition.
These problems also occurred from time to time after 1949, and adding the huge external threats and complicated relations with the super powers during and after the Cold War, these problems have also brought some extreme difficulties and risks to the country and the Party after the PRC was established. “How did the CPC go through these ‘darkest hours’ and overcome the extreme challenges?” By answering this question, it can allow the foreigners interested in China and some Westerners who failed to understand the CPC decision-making and could not explain China’s development to learn a better way to deal with China and the CPC today, said Chinese experts, adding that this will also help people understand how and why the CPC will handle the challenges in the future.
According to experts on Party history and Chinese politics reached by the Global Times, there is one key reason why the CPC can always overcome those crises and find the correct direction of the path – the Party can always find its proper and strong core leadership to ensure the victories against the enemies and realize self-correction.
The Red Boat on South Lake in Jiaxing, East China’s Zhejiang Province where the first National Congress of the CPC was concluded after the discussions in Shanghai was interrupted.
Fighting for autonomy
The first major life-and-death moment for the CPC after 1949 was the Cultural Revolution between 1966 and 1976. This incident caused the Party, China and people to suffer the most serious setbacks and losses since the founding of the PRC, and the economy was on the verge of collapse, said Luo Pinghan, a professor at the Party School of the Central Committee of CPC.
Apart from the internal chaos and difficulties, China was also facing serious external threats from both Soviet Union and the US. According to leaked documents from the Pentagon, in 1958, amid the second Taiwan Straits crisis, the US had planned to launch nuclear strikes against almost every major city in China to not only destroy the military and industrial targets but also to eliminate the Chinese population.
At the same time, the Sino-Soviet split also caused the relationship between China and the Soviet Union to intensify, and both sides even had a military conflict at the border in 1969. After the conflict, the Soviet Union also planned to launch nuclear strikes against China’s major military bases and cities, including the capital city Beijing, according to historical references.
Due to tensions with both the US and Soviet Union, not just being threatened militarily, China’s development faced huge difficulties due to the sanctions and pressure from both superpowers.
To ensure the security and autonomy of China under such a severe situation, the first generation of CPC leaders with Mao as the core had to be tough when dealing with the US and Soviet Union, said Jin Canrong, associate dean of the School of International Studies at the Renmin University of China.
“In this period, the most important mission for the CPC was to ensure the survival of the PRC, so from the 1950s to 1970s, China was assertive and determined to defend its hard-won independence and autonomy. The CPC needed to prevent the PRC from being controlled or bullied by others at all cost,” Jin said.
Thanks to the success in developing China’s own nuclear weapons and ballistic missiles in the 1960s, also known as the “Two Bombs, One Satellite” project, as well as the flexible decision-making and diplomatic efforts, and by leveraging the struggle between the US and Soviet Union, China successfully avoided and deterred a nuclear war with the two superpowers amid the Cold War, said experts.
” The ‘Three World Theory’ proposed by Mao proved to be relevant. As the core of the CPC and China’s leader at that time, Mao wisely used the confrontation between the US and Soviet Union to expand China’s influence and popularity in the third world,” Yang Xuedong, a professor of political science at Tsinghua University, told the Global Times.
After a series of diplomatic, political and military efforts, the PRC was recognized as “the only legitimate representative of China to the UN” in 1971 and also achieved the goal of normalization of China-US ties in 1972. Some analysts said the CPC is really good at seeking opportunity from the crisis, and even turn the crisis into an opportunity.
People look at a statue called “winning bugle” in Jinggangshan, the “cradle of the Chinese revolution,” in East China’s Jiangxi Province on April 23.
Inheritance and self-correction
While the danger of war with superpowers was avoided, China’s international influence was growing and in the field of strategic nuclear power, China achieved significant goals, but the internal problem of the Cultural Revolution still remained.
In 1976, the victory in smashing the “Gang of Four” lifted the Party and the country from the crisis, but the political, ideological, organizational, and economic chaos left over from the Cultural Revolution was still very dire, and it was not easy to get rid of such a predicament and start anew, Luo said.
In 1978, the Party led and supported discussion about “Practice is the sole criterion for testing the truth,” which was of great significance in bringing the country out of the chaos. The 3rd Plenary Session of the 11th Central Committee of the CPC fundamentally broke the binding shackles of the problems of left-leaning theories, corrected the Party’s guiding ideology, re-established the Marxist ideological, political, and organizational line, and eventually realized the Party’s successes since the founding of the PRC.
“This was a great turning point with far-reaching significance in history.” The Party earnestly corrected major historical wrongs, adopted a series of measures to rectify unjust and erroneous acts, and implemented various policies conducive to strengthening unity, mobilizing all positive elements, Luo noted.
In the transition period between the first generation of CPC leaders with Mao at its core and the second generation with Deng Xiaoping at the center, the CPC has avoided huge internal turbulence like what happened in the Soviet Union after former Soviet leader Joseph Stalin’s death as Nikita Khrushchev denied the contributions Stalin made to the Soviet Union.
The second generation of leadership inherited the first generation’s achievements and corrected its errors, rather than making no change, or replacing everything, and this remains the key reason why the CPC still exists and leads China in its march forward, while the Communist Party of the Soviet Union collapsed, said some observers.
The 6th Plenary Session of the 11th CPC Central Committee in 1981 passed the “Resolution on Certain Questions in the History of our Party since the Founding of the PRC”, which fundamentally denied the Cultural Revolution and its relevant ideals, but the resolution also successfully sought not to deny Mao and Mao Zedong Thought, and confirmed the guiding role of Mao Zedong Thought for the CPC.
“With the changes inside and outside China, it’s increasingly evident that the second generation of the CPC leadership with Deng at its core has political courage and foresight by implementing such correct and significant decisions,” Luo said.
This Is Harmony OS From Huawei, China: It Connects Everything! 這是來自中國華為的鴻蒙操作系統：它連接一切！In the past two decades, China has lost the PC era and the mobile Internet era in terms of operating systems. Now, in the IoT era, it finally has the opportunity to outcompete other players. In the words of Wang Chenglu: If HarmonyOS succeeds, the next 20 years of the mobile industry will belong to China. Published on June 3 2021 過去20年，中國在操作系統方面已經失去了PC時代和移動互聯網時代。 現在，在物聯網時代，它終於有機會超越其他玩家。 用王成錄的話來說：鴻蒙OS成功了，下一個20年的移動產業將屬於中國. https://youtu.be/3ai49xcDDBg https://vimeo.com/558790063 https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/504219987467998/?d=n
Video: Biological warfare? Drosophila melanogaster discovered by Chinese customs sent from US. Drosophila melanogaster is a species of fly in the family Drosophilidae. The species is often referred to as the fruit fly, though its common name is more accurately the vinegar fly. Drosophila is a significant pest that attacks healthy fruit prior to harvest. As fruit integrity is compromised by oviposition and larval feeding, common vinegar flies (i.e., Drosophila melanogaster) may also oviposit in the damaged fruit. 藏在貼錯標籤的海運集裝箱內, 從美國寄到中國的黑腹果蠅被中國海關發現. https://vimeo.com/558746438 https://youtu.be/VBiY30yT4II https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/504165310806799/?d=n
Academic paper reveals Hong Kong student protesters were paid to be guinea pigs in bizarre experiment that may have gone wrong 學術論文揭示香港學生抗議者在可能出錯的奇怪實驗中被支付為豚鼠 Allegations that pro-democracy activists in Hong Kong have been paid for their activities have swirled for years but have always been strenuously rubbished by the Western media. Now, an academic study seems to confirm just that. 關於香港民主活動人士因其活動而獲得報酬的指控已經流傳多年，但一直被西方媒體極力抨擊。 現在，一項學術研究似乎證實了這一點. 3 Jun, 2021
By Kit Klarenberg, an investigative journalist exploring the role of intelligence services in shaping politics and perceptions. Follow him on Twitter @KitKlarenberg
Secreted in the depths of academic journal American Economic Review’s June edition is an absolutely extraordinary research paper, revealing that a team of Western scholars conducted a somewhat peculiar study analyzing why students attended protests in Hong Kong – and that participants were paid to do so.
The paper’s abstract notes that the academics set out to study “the causes of sustained participation in political movements.” In order to “identify the persistent effect of protest participation,” and the role of social networks in organizing and motivating protests and protesters, they “randomly indirectly [incentivized]” – that is, paid – 849 students at the University of Hong Kong to participate in an “antiauthoritarian protest” for two years running, in 2017 and 2018.
The protest in question was the annual July 1 march, which has been convened every year since 1997, the year of Hong Kong’s handover from the UK to China. The academics say the marches studied were “peaceful” and “modestly sized”, attracting around 50,000 citizens, and sought “to both achieve policy concessions and signal the strength of the movement.”
They found that “incentives” to attend a political protest increased and, indeed, sustained subsequent crowd sizes, “but only when a sufficient fraction of an individual’s social network [was] also incentivized to attend the initial protest.”
Essentially, while a greater turnout among the wider population at large would “affect a subject’s beliefs about the likelihood that a public good is produced or a government crackdown may occur,” the participation of an individual’s friends had “a large effect on the social utility derived from protest participation, the coordination costs of attending, and social image considerations.”
The academics are keen to emphasize that they aimed to encourage protest participation without “explicitly” paying for people to attend, but instead “[paid] for behavior conditional on turnout.” So, the 849 randomly selected students weren’t directly remunerated for going to a protest, but for “providing information that would help estimate crowd sizes at the protest.” Participants were recruited via an email that was sent to the university’s entire undergraduate body.
Once the protests ended, participants filled in an online survey, and were given an additional HK$350 ($45) – about 1% of an average monthly wage on the island – for their “time and effort.” The original sum received for attendance isn’t stated.
“Subjects … received an email the day before the July 1, 2017 march with detailed instructions on how to complete the task. Treated subjects would be able to use a secure link to upload the information we requested,” the paper records. “Subjects who upload[ed] all the requested information and complete[d] the protest participation reporting module would be eligible to receive the bonus payment.”
If all that sounds rather strange, it’s because it absolutely is. For one, the academics’ finding that offering financial inducements to people to attend protests promotes turnout, particularly if those people know one another, seems banal and self-evident – a fait accompli if ever there was one.
The academics explain their rationale for conducting the research in the paper’s introduction, noting that, while “political rights have historically often arisen from successful, long-running movements,” there is a lack of empirical investigation into “the causes of individuals’ sustained participation in political movements.”
That seems reasonable enough, until one considers that the same group of scholars has been publishing papers on this question annually for quite some time – and, on each occasion, University of Hong Kong students have been their guinea pigs.
In 2016, for instance, their research included “manipulating” subjects’ beliefs about the participation of others to gauge whether a perception of ‘missing out’ drove greater attendance. A day before the July 1 protest that year, paid participants were provided with “truthful information” about other attendees’ protest plans to see if there was a corresponding increase.
That experiment was funded by the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER), which, in 2010, ranked as the second-most influential economic think tank in the US. Two of the academics involved in the research, Leonardo Bursztyn and David Y Yang, are “affiliated scholars” of the NBER.
The organization is funded by a number of US government agencies and charitable organizations, including the controversial Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, which raises the obvious question of who or what ultimately benefited from this research, and to what purpose the findings were put.
The latter riddle gets more curious when one considers that in their 2020 study of protest participation, the academics note that, while the University of Hong Kong’s Science and Technology (HKUST) department’s institutional review board (IRB) – the body that formally vets biomedical and behavioral research involving humans – approved their first “experimental intervention” with students in 2017, that approval was rescinded two years later.
“The HKUST Human Participants Research Panel (HPRP) wrote to us requesting that we remove references to the HKUST IRB approval of our study, on the basis that the study went beyond what was approved in our proposal,” the paper states.
Detail of this alleged breach of academic ethics isn’t provided, and the academics “unambiguously” reject the charge, although it may be no coincidence that HKUST sought to distance itself from the study on November 28, 2019 – the same month the violent “siege” of the University of Hong Kong erupted. The strife began when students disrupted road and train traffic near the campus on November 11 to facilitate a general strike.
The authorities responded by firing pepper bullets at students and launching volleys of tear gas into the campus, precipitating almost a week of ever-escalating violence from activists. Within days, students had created an elaborate system of barricades to block roads and shield the entrances to the university’s halls of residence, set traps to puncture car tyres, stockpiled a large number of petrol bombs, and were routinely hurling bricks and tiles, and firing arrows from rooftops at the police.
It’s unclear how many, if any, of the students participating in these incendiary activities were initially roused to political action by being “randomly” selected for the academics’ numerous protest studies over the years, but HKUST’s attempted backpedaling suggests it’s a distinct possibility that at least some were.
Tiananmen 1989 Student Leader Chailing: “We are hoping for bloodshed” | Western MSM will never show this. To Succeed, US’s Color Revolution must see blood and Chailing failed to deliver. 天安門1989學生領袖柴玲：“我們希望流血” | 西方 MSM 永遠不會讓你看到。 想要成功, 美國在天安門的顏色革命必須見血. There is a lot of misinformation and Western-media-created myth surrounding the mainland Chinese student protests of 1989 which involved occupying Tiananmen Square. This is a raw interview with Tiananmen Square’s most radical/recognizable student leader, and Commander-in-Chief of the Defend Tiananmen Headquarters, Chailing. 圍繞 1989 年中國大陸學生佔領天安門廣場的抗議活動，有很多錯誤信息和西方媒體製造的神話。 這是對天安門廣場最激進/最知名的學生領袖、保衛天安門司令部總司令柴玲的原始採訪。published Jun 3, 2021 https://vimeo.com/558642345 https://youtu.be/nbEpfOPPay8 https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/504064437483553/?d=n
American Economic Review” sponsored by the American Economic Association revealed that Western money hired students from Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. These University Students “white mice” participated in a so-called social experiment, they studied demonstration patterns as an excuse, but in fact incited riots. . The so-called “scholars” in charge of the research come from the National Institute of Economic Research, Harvard University and Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. This so-called paper actually claimed that “protests are the source of Hong Kong’s stability”, which is exactly the same as Pelosi’s “violence is the beautiful scenery of Hong Kong”, and it is ironclad evidence that the West has instigated the Hong Kong version of the “color revolution”.
【罪证曝光】美僱港千名大学生 当暴乱”白老鼠” 2021-06-03 08:04 （大公报记者 施文达、周扬、李斯达）美国经济学会主办的学术期刊《美国经济评论》（The American Economic Review），泄露西方资金僱请香港科大学生，当”白老鼠”参与一项所谓社会实验，美其名研究示威模式，实则煽惑暴乱。负责研究的所谓”学者”来自美国全国经济研究所、哈佛大学及香港科技大学等。这篇所谓论文竟称”抗议是香港稳定的源头”，这与佩洛西的”暴力是香港美丽风景线”如出一辙，是西方煽动港版”颜色革命”的铁证。
A bill sponsored by Sen. Scott Wiener to legalize safe injection sites for legalized formerly illegal drugs in certain cities in California was passed by the Senate on Thursday. 真的是報應, 美國人的西人祖父對中國所做盡的壞事, 今天報應在他們的後代. Karma returns to hit US – some of the prominent AngloSaxon families sold opium to China with guns pointed at Beijing in the 1800s, made huge profits. Today in America, streets are filled with drug addicts with the approval of City, State and Federal Government. 美國自殘 Drugs could be found in Intermediate and high schools throughout America. Cocaine will probably be legalized soon. Imagine 1800s China drugs problems to replay in US in coming years and decades. I have a dozen or so Chinese clients’ children are already serious drug addicts. Drug problems does not care you are White, Black, Red or Yellow. If you are in US’s drug lala land, no one safe. 美國加州舊金山世界日報 World Journal Newspaper San Francisco, June 3 2021
Johnson Choi Biz 