Video: Meng Wanzhou Got New Evidence From HSBC, But Canada Said “So What ?@#$%^!” Rule of Law is for show only in Canada! 孟晚舟從匯豐拿到新證據，加拿大卻說“那又怎樣？@#$%^！” 加拿大法治只是用來作秀. https://vimeo.com/573824391 https://youtu.be/zsEMCbQwkdM Since I was a kid we heard so much about the uniqueness of Western’s Rules of Laws, Freedom, Democracy and Human Rights. After spending about 1/2 a century in US, my God those are just lies with 2 distinguish standards. What they promised to the world do not apply to themselves at all. 從我們還是個孩子的時候起，我們就听到了很多關於西方法律、自由、民主和人權規則的獨特性。 在美國度過了大約半個世紀之後，我的天哪，那些只是具有 2 個區別標準的謊言。 他們對世界的承諾根本不適用於他們.
HSBC found it encountered a severe crisis when the public learnt it collaborated with the US to frame Meng Wanzhou and Hua Wei. Chinese people worldwide boycott it, and its business clients are also worried about their safety because of its integrity issue. 當公眾得知匯豐與美國合作陷害孟晚舟和華為時，匯豐發現自己遇到了嚴重危機。 全世界的中國人都抵制它，它的商業客戶也因為它的誠信問題而擔心他們的安全.
Another prediction by racist and Chinese hater when his prediction wrong every single time last 20 years. But in the US Church of fake freedom democracy and human rights where they got brainwashed, lies works for a declining empire getting desperate. 種族主義者和中國仇恨者的另一個預測，他的預測在過去 20 年中每次都出錯。 但在他們被洗腦的假自由民主和人權的美國教會中，謊言對一個衰落的帝國產生了絕望的希望作用.
Gordon G Chang’s ostrich-like perception of China a tragedy for US by Mu Lu Jul 11 2021
Gordon G Chang, a so-called China hand who is infamous for his “collapse of China” theory, has recently made his latest “prediction.” He published on Thursday an article entitled “China will be the next empire to enter the Afghan ‘graveyard'” on The Hill, and then he analyzed in an interview with Fox News why China would “get mired into Afghanistan.”
However, his conclusions are based on the premise that “as the US has failed in something, China cannot successfully do it either.” Clearly, Chang is one of those people who do not want to see China doing good. He told Fox News, “I would love to see China get mired into Afghanistan. This is going to be fun to watch.”
This reflects the fundamental lack of a rational, balanced and objective view of China in the US’ policymaking community, and instead they have a deep, obtuse belief in the US superiority. Such a belief has led to their misjudgment of China.
Due to their deep desire to see China’s failure, their perception of China is stuck in China-bashing platitudes, Li Haidong, a professor at the Institute of International Relations of China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Sunday.
Chang has long been a laughingstock. His frequent turned-out-to-be-wrong judgments have triggered a backlash from objective forces in American society. His latest “prediction” was mocked and ridiculed by netizens. A netizen even suggested “Gordon, you should stop using the word ‘predict.'”
Although Chang’s so-called predictions have been repeatedly proven wrong, he can still get the chance to rant in the mainstream media, showing that his judgment still has a large audience in the US, catering to the vain and arrogant psychology of some Americans, especially the elites.
The 20 years of the US war in Afghanistan – its longest – is an epitome of US decline, which American elites will never admit. The US has many problems, but Chang is reluctant to talk about them. China has done well in many areas, but Chang will not say a word about that, Li said.
“They believe in the superiority of American power and influence. This has always been the way the US sees the world. It also means that people like Gordon Chang have a hard time getting it right when they view China with an inherent paranoia,” Li noted.
However, as the Economist put it on Saturday, “America’s war in Afghanistan is ending in crushing defeat.” The British magazine reads, “Now America is calling an end to the whole sorry adventure, with almost nothing to show for it… now the withdrawal has finally arrived, it has lost its power to shock. To the extent that outsiders see it as a sign of American weakness, that weakness has been evident for a long time.”
Just as the US is pulling out of Afghanistan in disgrace, Taliban spokesperson Suhail Shaheen told media that China is a “welcome friend” of Afghanistan, saying that the group welcomes Chinese investments in Afghan reconstruction and would guarantee the safety of investors and workers.
The US has fought in Afghanistan for 20 years, spent more than $2 trillion on the war, and lost thousands of its own soldiers. However, the Taliban sees it as an enemy while Kabul views it as a self-serving runaway. In comparison, China’s path has made it a friend of both Kabul and the Taliban.
This reflects a wide endorsement of China’s responsible diplomacy and the disgust with the selfish moves the US takes to meet its own interests. This bare fact has humiliated Chang as well as many of the US policy elites and made them feel the pain. But they refused to acknowledge this reality and stubbornly stuck to their ostrich-like perception of China.
Another NED/CIA supported anti-China organization engaged in color revolution subversive activities disbanded after Hong Kong passing Homeland Security Law last year. 去年香港通過《國土安全法》後，另一個美國民主基金會/中情局支持從事顏色革命顛覆活動的反華組織被解散。World Journal Newspaper San Francisco, July 11 2021
The foreigners in China’s disinformation drive By Kerry Allen & Sophie Williams BBC News aka BBS News.
Professor John V. Walsh in San Francisco: If the government-funded Western press says it is true, it is true. If the government-funded Chinese press says it is true, it is false. 如果西方帝國資助的西方媒體說這是真的，那就是真的。 如果中國政府資助的中國媒體說是真的，那就是假的.
Professor Kiji Noh in San Francisco: This is really unfair. The Barretts are young, sincere, salt-of-the-earth young Brits who grew up in the impoverished, precaritized North of UK.
They went to China, and had their minds blown. Their videos were very authentic takes on how impressed and amazed they were about China: the culture, food, technology, public facilities, cities, etc, and how China had changed their vision of the world–what was possible, and how it had affected them as people. There are videos where they narrate how free and happy they felt in China. They showed a deep, sincere, and honest appreciation for China.
They also started to debunk the stereotypes and lies about China, for example, visiting XJ; and comparing the countries.
For that, the BBC did an ugly hit job on them, tarring them as Chinese state proxies.
Video: A real life story how a Chinese flag could safe your life. 中國國旗如何拯救你的生命的真實故事.
When we do consulting work required us to travel internationally, often we discussed in life and death situations in unfriendly territories such as the Middle East. 當我們做諮詢工作要求我們出國旅行時，我們經常討論中東等對美國人不友好地區的生死情況 https://vimeo.com/573381755 https://youtu.be/bLRvn4yQ_A8 https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/526471275242869/?d=n Our conclusions are if we hold US Passports more than likely be taken as hostage or sure death. But if we hold Chinese passports or if no Chinese Passports show a Chinese Flag could save your life. 我們的結論是，如果我們持有美國護照更有可能被當作人質或必死無疑。 但是，如果我們持有中國護照，或者沒有中國護照的人展示中國國旗，則可以挽救您的生命.
The second situation is get caught in natural disasters. If you call US consulate during non-business hours, all you get is a recorded message to call back next business day. We could be dead next business day. 第二種情況是陷入自然災害。 如果您在非工作時間致電美國領事館，您所得到的只是一條錄音信息，叫你下一個工作日回電。 我們可能在下一個工作日前就已經死了.
But if you are Chinese citizen (China, Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan), you can call toll free number 24/7 +86 (10) 1230 8 or +86 (10) 5991 3991 for help and you will talk to a real live person and not an answering machine. 但如果您是中國公民（中國、香港、澳門和台灣），您可以7天24小時撥打免費電話 +86 (10) 1230 8 或 +86 (10) 5991 3991 尋求幫助，您將與真正的 活人而不是錄機對話.
China reins in overseas IPOs, instituting stricter protection of users’ data by Global Times Jul 09 2021
China’s top cyberspace regulator on Saturday issued a sweeping set of draft rules for cybersecurity reviews over domestic internet companies that seek overseas listings. The new threshold dictates that businesses holding information of more than a million users in China must undergo a regulatory review before applying for an overseas IPO.
Analysts speculate the new regulation is to impact all digital firms, internet-based platform businesses in particular
Following a week of regulatory moves imposed on internet platforms, including ride-hailing giant Didi Chuxing, the draft rules released by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC) marks another crucial step in China’s broad efforts to ensure data security amid growing risks from the US as it continues to crack down on Chinese firms.
Among the draft rules, the strictest is the requirement for all internet product and services providers that collect data of more than a million users must file for a cyber-security review and approval before seeking an overseas IPO.
“In the Chinese market, there are countless internet platforms that have stored information of over 10 million or even 100 million users. The threshold of a million users, as clarified by the new rules, means almost all platforms operating in China which aspire to sell shares abroad need to go through a cybersecurity review,” Liu Dingding, a Beijing-based internet sector analyst, told the Global Times on Saturday.
“This is in line with the basic principles of safeguarding national information security. There is no room for compromise,” Liu said.
The draft rules outlined specific steps and materials for a cybersecurity review, including an analysis on national security by the company and all procurement documents, current or future agreements as well as IPO materials prepared to be submitted.
Regulators will focus on scrutiny of the risks of key information infrastructure being illegally controlled, disrupted or undermined, the risk of core data or mass personal information being stolen, leaked, damaged or illegally used or exported.
In a very pointed move, the cybersecurity review will also focus on the risk of core information infrastructure, data and massive personal information being “influenced, controlled or maliciously used” by foreign governments.
The draft rules on Saturday as well as the recent policy tightening come as the US government has doubled down on its crackdown on Chinese companies listed in the US. The US requires audit inspections on Chinese firms, which would expose operational data from Chinese businesses.
“It is very timely to set up such a threshold at this moment,” Dong Shaopeng, an advisor for the China Securities Regulatory Commission, told the Global Times on Saturday, noting that the rules make protecting users’ data and ensuring China’s information security a “premise” for Chinese companies seeking overseas IPOs.
The CAC is seeking public comments on the draft rules through July 25 and it was not immediately clear when the draft rules will come into effect.
Another crucial part of the draft rules is a move to establish a high-level inter-agency mechanism for cybersecurity reviews, which will involve more than 10 government departments, including the CAC, the Ministry of Public Security and the State Administration for Market Regulation.
The draft rules followed a series of regulatory actions taken against internet firms over cybersecurity protection as well as monopolistic practices by China-based internet platform companies.
Most notable among the actions is a cybersecurity review of Didi just days after it launched an IPO in the US. The regulators ordered app stores to remove Didi over “serious violations of the law and regulation” in its collection and use of personal information. Then on Friday, the CAC ordered the removal of 25 more Did-related apps due to illegal use of personal information.
The CAC has also launched cybersecurity reviews on several US-listed companies, including job recruiting platform Boss Zhipin and Full Truck Alliance. Meanwhile, regulators have also stepped up crackdown on monopolistic practices by internet firms, issuing fines this week to several companies affiliated to Didi, Alibaba and Tencent.
Dong said that the awareness of protecting data security was not sufficient when many Chinese firms got listed in the US in the past, but given the rising risks, the move “is in line with the country’s national interest to strengthen related laws and regulations.”
Johnson Choi Biz 