US Government selling hatred with fake news and propaganda against China, Chinese and Chinese Americans in US and around the world is paying off big time. Hate Crimes against Chinese and Asian Americans in the United States increase by 363%. 美國政府種族歧視用假新聞和針對中國和中國人在全球尤其是在美國宣傳宣揚仇恨得到非常理想的回報. 美國針對華裔和亞裔美國人的仇恨犯罪增加了 363%. World Journal Newspaper San Francisco 美國加州舊金山世界日報 August 6 2021
Video: What does US robbing & stealing around the world in the name of fake freedom democracy human rights and rules of laws taught Americans lives in US. It is OK! In fact it is legal to steal up to US$950 not a crime. 美國以虛假的自由民主人權和法律規則的名義在世界各地搶劫和偷竊告訴美國人 什麼. 沒關係！ 在美國盜竊高達950美元是合法的，而不是犯罪.
https://vimeo.com/583801288
https://youtube.com/shorts/vMHaUXqaJoE
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/542529560303707/?d=n
As a vassal state of US using American’s doctrines, this is how the Canadian Government in the name of freedom democracy human rights and rules of law treating the Indigenous People. 作為美國的附庸國必須跟隨美國的做法, 這就是加拿大政府以自由民主人權和法律規則的名義對待加拿大原住民的方式.
Canada is Waging All-Front Legal War Against Indigenous People – After mass graves full of Indigenous children have been found, how can Canada justify ongoing land theft? by Justin Podur Aug 3 2021
Canada is developing a new image: one of burning churches, toppling statues, and mass graves. There are thousands more unmarked graves, thousands more Indigenous children killed at residential schools, remaining to be unearthed. There can be no denying that this is Canada, and it has to change. But can Canada transform itself for the better? If the revelation of the mass killing of Indigenous children is to lead to any actual soul-searching and any meaningful change, the first order of business is for Canada to stop its all-front war against First Nations. Much of that war is taking place through the legal system.
Canadian politicians have said as much, adopting a motion in June calling for the government to stop fighting residential school survivors in court. A long-standing demand, it has been repeated by Indigenous advocates who have expressed amazement in the face of these horrific revelations that the Canadian government would nonetheless continue to fight Indigenous survivors of systematic child abuse by the state.
To get a sense of the scope of Canada’s legal war on First Nations, I looked at a Canadian legal database containing decisions (case law) pertaining to First Nations. I also looked at the hearing lists of the Federal Court of Canada for ongoing cases. My initial goal was to identify where Canada could easily settle or abandon cases, bringing about a harmonious solution to these conflicts. Two things surprised me.
The first was the volume and diversity of lawsuits Canada is fighting. Canada is fighting First Nations everywhere, on an astoundingly wide range of issues.
The second thing: Canada is losing.
THE ATTACK ON INDIGENOUS CHILDREN AND WOMEN
In his 1984 essay “‘Pioneering’ in the Nuclear Age,” political theorist Eqbal Ahmad argued that the “four fundamental elements… without which an indigenous community cannot survive” were “land, water, leaders and culture.” Canada fights Indigenous people over land, water, fishing rights, mining projects, freedom of movement, and more. The assault on Indigenous nations is also a war against Indigenous children and women.
In the high-profile case of First Nations Child & Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada, laid out in detail by Cindy Blackstock, “the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada and the Assembly of First Nations filed a complaint under the Canadian Human Rights Act alleging” in 2007 “that the Government of Canada had a longstanding pattern of providing less government funding for child welfare services to First Nations children on reserves than is provided to non-Aboriginal children.” The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT) found in favor of the First Nations complainants in 2016.
Note that this isn’t about the history of residential schools. It’s about discrimination against Indigenous kids in the present day. “In fact, the problem might be getting worse,” writes Blackstock, compared with “the height of residential school operations.” As evidence, she refers to a 2005 study of three sample provinces showing a wide gap between the percent of First Nations children in child welfare care (10.23% percent) compared to a much lower rate for non-First Nations children (0.67 percent). In 2006, following the Canadian government’s repeated failures to act on the inequity described in this report (which also included comprehensive suggested reforms that had both moral and economic appeal), Blackstock writes, “the Caring Society and the Assembly of First Nations agreed that legal action was required.” The CHRT was very clear in its 2019 decision that the federal government should compensate each victim the maximum amount, which addressed the victims as follows:
“No amount of compensation can ever recover what you have lost, the scars that are left on your souls or the suffering that you have gone through as a result of racism, colonial practices and discrimination.”
In May 2021, Canada, which has spent millions of dollars fighting this case, tried to overturn the CHRT’s ruling.
Canada’s war on Indigenous children is also a war on Indigenous women. The sterilization of Indigenous women, beginning with Canada’s eugenics program around 1900, is another act of genocide, as scholar Karen Stote has argued. Indigenous women who had tubal ligation without their consent as part of this eugenics program have brought a class-action suit against the provinces of Alberta and British Columbia, both of which had Sexual Sterilization Acts in their provincial laws from the 1920s in Alberta and 1930s in British Columbia until the early 1970s, and Saskatchewan, where sexual sterilization legislation was proposed but failed by one vote in 1930. A Senate committee found a case of forced sterilization of an Indigenous woman as recently as 2019.
THE LEGAL-FINANCIAL WAR ON FIRST NATIONS ORGANISATIONS
As Bob Joseph outlines in his 2018 book 21 Things You May Not Know About the Indian Act, Canada first gave itself the right to decide Indian status in the Gradual Civilization Act of 1857, which created a process by which Indigenous people could give up their Indian status and so become “enfranchised”—which they would have to do if they wanted to attend higher education or become professionals. The apartheid system was updated through the Indian Act of 1876, from which sprang many evils including both the residential schools and the assertion of Canadian control over the way First Nations govern themselves.
In 1927, when Indigenous veterans of World War I began to hold meetings with one another to discuss their situation, Canada passed laws forbidding Indigenous people from political organisation and from raising funds to hire legal counsel (and from playing billiards, among other things).
The Indian Act—which is still in effect today with amendments, despite multiple attempts to repeal it—outlawed traditional governance structures and gave Canada the power to intervene to remove and install Indigenous governance authorities at will—which Canada did continuously, from Six Nations in 1924 to Barriere Lake in 1995. As a result, at any given moment, many First Nations are still embroiled in lawsuits over control of their own governments.
Canada controls the resources available to First Nations, including drinking water. In another national embarrassment, Canada has found itself able to provision drinking water to diamond mines but not First Nations. This battle too has entered the courts, with a class-action suit by Tataskweyak Cree Nation, Curve Lake First Nation, and Neskantaga First Nation demanding that Canada not only compensate their nations, but also work with them to build the necessary water systems.
Canada dribbles out humiliating application processes by which Indigenous people can try to exercise their human right to housing. When combined with the housing crisis on reserves, these application processes have attracted swindlers like consultant Jerry Paulin, who sued Cat Lake First Nation for $1.2 million, claiming that his efforts were the reason the First Nation received federal funds for urgent housing repairs.
Canada uses the threat of withdrawal of these funds to impose stringent financial “transparency” conditions on First Nations—the subject of legal struggle, in which Cold Lake First Nations has argued that the financial transparency provisions violate their rights. Canada has used financial transparency claims to put First Nations finances under third-party management, withholding and misusing the funds in a not-very-transparent way, as the Algonquins of Barriere Lake charged in another lawsuit. An insistence on transparency is astounding for a country that buried massive numbers of Indigenous children in unmarked graves.
Win or lose, the lawsuits themselves impose high costs on First Nations whose finances are, for the most part, controlled by Canada. The result is situations like the one where the Beaver Lake Cree are suing Canada for costs because they ran out of money suing Canada for their land. When First Nations are winning in court, Canada tries to bankrupt them before they get there.
LAND AND RESOURCES ARE THE CORE OF THE STRUGGLE
The core issue between Canada and First Nations is land. Most battles are over the land on which the state of Canada sits, all of which was stolen and much of which was swindled through legal processes that couldn’t hold up to scrutiny and are now unraveling. “[I]n simple acreage,” the late Indigenous leader Arthur Manuel wrote in the 2017 book The Reconciliation Manifesto, this was “the biggest land theft in the history of mankind,” reducing Indigenous people from holding 100 percent of the landmass to 0.2 percent.
One of the most economically important pieces of land is the Haldimand tract in southern Ontario, which generates billions of dollars in revenue that belongs, by right, to the Six Nations, as Phil Monture has extensively documented. Six Nations submitted ever-more detailed land claims, until Canada simply stopped accepting them. But in July, their sustained resistance led to the cancellation of a planned suburban development (read: settlement) on Six Nations land.
Many of the First Nations court battles are defensive. Namgis, Ahousaht, Dzawada’enuxw, and Gwa’sala-’Nakwaxda’xw First Nations have tried to defend their wild fisheries against encroachment and pollution by settler fish farms. West Moberly, Long Plain, Peguis, Roseau River Anishinabe, Aroland, Ginoogaming, Squamish, Coldwater, Tsleil-Waututh, Aitchelitz, Skowkale, and Shxwha:y Village First Nations challenged dams and pipelines. Canada has a history of “pouring big money” into these court battles to the tune of tens of millions—small money compared to its tens of billions subsidizing and taking over financially unviable pipelines running through Indigenous lands—including that of the Wet’suwet’en, whose resistance sparked mass protests across Canada in 2020. The duty to consult First Nations on such projects is itself the outcome of a legal struggle, won in the 2004 decision in Haida Nation v. British Columbia.
First Nations who were swindled or coerced out of their lands (or water, as with Iskatewizaagegan No. 39 Independent First Nation’s case against Winnipeg and Ontario for illegally taking their water from Shoal Lake for use by the city of Winnipeg starting in 1913) fight for their land back, for compensation, or both. The Specific Claims Tribunal has 132 ongoing cases. In Saskatchewan in May, the tribunal awarded Mosquito Grizzly Bear’s Head Lean Man First Nation $141 million and recognition that they never surrendered their land as Canada had claimed they had in 1905. In June, Heiltsuk First Nation won a part of their land back.
First Nations also fight for their fishing rights in courts and out on the water, as settler fishers have physically attacked and tried to intimidate Mi’kmaw fishers on Canada’s east coast. In June, on the west coast, after the British Columbia Court of Appeals found against Canada, the federal government announced it wouldn’t appeal, dropping a 15-year litigation that restricted Nuu-chah-nulth First Nations fishing quotas.
DECOLONISATION JUST MIGHT BE INEVITABLE
Why does Canada keep fighting (and losing) even as its legitimacy as a state built on theft and genocide crumbles? It’s not merely the habits of centuries. It’s also the absence of any project besides the displacement of First Nations and the plunder of the land. Canada could take the first step to ending all this by declaring a unilateral ceasefire in the legal war. Too few Canadians understand that this would actually be a very good thing.
First Nations lived sustainably for thousands of years in these extraordinary northern ecosystems. Then the European empires arrived, bringing smallpox and tuberculosis among other scourges. Local extinctions of beaver and buffalo quickly followed, as well as the total extinction of the passenger pigeon.
Today’s settler state has poisoned pristine lakes with mine tailings, denuded the country’s spectacular forests, and gifted the atmosphere some of the world’s highest per capita carbon emissions (seventh in the world in 2018—more than Saudi Arabia, which was 10th, and the US, which was 11th). Indigenous visionaries have better ideas, such as those presented by Leanne Betasamosake Simpson and Arthur Manuel, or for that matter the Red Deal and the People’s Agreement of Cochabamba.
Under Indigenous sovereignty, Canadians could truly be guests of the First Nations, capable of fulfilling their obligations to their hosts and their hosts’ lands, rather than the pawns of the settler state’s war against those from whom the land was stolen.
Justin Podur is a Toronto-based writer and a writing fellow at Globetrotter. You can find him on his website at podur.org and on Twitter @justinpodur. He teaches at York University in the Faculty of Environmental and Urban Change.
Newseek: Most countries in the world see the total number of gold medals as the supreme athletic nation. If the United States wants to be that country, then its athletes will need to probably win 10 more events (or more) by Sunday, which is when these Games come to a close. 世界上大多數國家都將金牌總數視為運動最高的國家。 如果美國想成為那個國家，那麼它的運動員可能需要在周日之前贏得 10 個（或更多）項目，也就是這些奧運會即將結束的時候.
The National Interest – Graham Allison: China winning geopolitical Olympics – China is winning the real olympics : In brief, the major findings of our report across the five arenas are these. First, China is not only rising. It has already risen to a point that it has upended the post-Cold War order: geopolitically, economically, technologically, militarily, diplomatically, and politically. Washington officials continue straining to see China in our rearview mirror. They insist that it is no more than what they call a “near-peer competitor.” Reality says otherwise. The time has come to recognize China as a full-spectrum peer competitor of the United States. As such, it poses a graver geopolitical challenge than any American living has ever seen. 中國贏得地緣政治奧運會 – 中國贏得了真正的奧運會：簡而言之，我們在五個領域的報告的主要發現是這些。 首先，中國不僅在崛起。 它已經上升到顛覆後冷戰秩序的地步：地緣政治、經濟、技術、軍事、外交和政治。 華盛頓官員繼續努力從我們的後視鏡中看到中國。 他們堅持認為這只不過是他們所謂的“近乎同行的競爭對手”。 現實另有說法。 是時候承認中國是美國的全方位競爭對手了。 因此，它構成了比任何美國人都見過的更嚴峻的地緣政治挑戰
https://nationalinterest.org/feature/geopolitical-olympics-could-china-win-gold-190761?page=0%2C1
Video: Eric Li: China🇨🇳 The Only Nation To Become Powerful Without Wars, Genocide & Colonialism in human history makes the Western Empires like US looks really bad. 李世默: 中國🇨🇳在人類歷史上唯一一個沒有戰爭、種族滅絕和殖民主義而變得強大的國家，讓美國這樣的西方帝國看起來很糟糕.
https://vimeo.com/583652561
https://youtu.be/2BbuRfA8Xy0
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/542308773659119/?d=n
Eric Li in his interview with Going Underground discusses the encirclement of China with 400 US military bases and how China has been the only nation in history to rise so quickly without foreign wars, genocides and imperialism. He goes on to say that the West, instead of encouraging this peaceful development, is encouraging confrontation.
Did the US Government mouthpiece has a change of heart? Professor John Walsh in San Francisco: The NYT ONLY tells the story of China’s success (The Times has not used that word before as best I can recall.) on the occasion of a possible failure under the assault of the delta variant. 美國政府喉舌變心了嗎？ 良心發現! 舊金山的約翰·沃爾什教授：《紐約時報》只講述了中國在 delta 變種病毒攻擊下可能失敗的情況下的成功故事（據我所知，《紐約時報》之前沒有使用過這個詞。）
The third paragraph reads: “That model is now looking increasingly fragile in a world that passed a grim milestone on Wednesday: the 200 millionth recorded case of infection.”
(China has had 95,000 cases and under 5000 deaths most all in the first month or two of the outbreak.
On top of that theNYT found only three people to interview on the ground and they all had complaints – like standing in line to get tested. (They could be in the US, wait in line to get tested and die a few days later. The last outcome has rarely been seen in China.)
China still has fewer than 5000 fatalities since the beginning of the pandemic with no deaths yet in the delta “outbreak” of 483 cases.
Let us wish China well. They have put human life first to the point where even the NYT begrudgingly admits it. However the admission is not a big deal now since the world knows full well of China’s success -it has become undeniable.
Full story- no paywall here:
http://archive.today/i37ar
PLA holds large drills amid military threats by Liu Xuanzun Aug 05 2021
A naval fleet comprised of the guided-missile destroyers Ningbo (Hull 139) and Taiyuan (Hull 131), as well as the guided-missile frigate Nantong (Hull 601), steams in astern formation in waters of the East China Sea during a maritime training drill in late January, 2021.
At a time when the US is holding large-scale military exercises targeting China, and several countries including the UK, Germany and India plan to send or have already sent warships to the South China Sea, China announced it will hold a military exercise from Friday to Tuesday in the South China Sea, setting up a vast navigation restriction zone some observers said resembles a drill conducted last year in which the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reportedly conducted live-fire “aircraft carrier killer” anti-ship ballistic missiles exercises.
While details on the upcoming drill remain speculative, it will serve as a response to the recent provocations, demonstrating that China has “hunting rifles ready against the wolves” that hunger for China’s core interests, experts said.
China will hold a military training in the South China Sea from Friday to Tuesday, and other vessels are prohibited from entering the navigation restriction zone, read a notice released by the Maritime Safety Administration on Wednesday.
The coordinates provided in the notice show that the exclusion zone stretches from waters off the southeast of Hainan Island to a majority of waters around the Xisha Islands, meaning that the exercise area is larger than even the Hainan Island, the National Defense Newspaper reported on Thursday.
The notice did not give more details on the exercise, but a Taipei-based news agency reported that the PLA launched anti-ship ballistic missiles in the South China Sea in a similar exercise last year.
Last year’s exercise, conducted from August 24 to 29, also featured a navigation restriction zone in almost the same location and of similar size announced by the Maritime Safety Administration.
US media outlets then quoted US defense officials as saying that China launched four medium-range ballistic missiles into the South China Sea in that exercise, landing in an area between Hainan Island and the Xisha Islands. This was widely interpreted by overseas media as the PLA testing anti-ship ballistic missiles, presumably “aircraft carrier killers” – the DF-21D and the DF-26.
Chinese Defense Ministry spokesperson Senior Colonel Wu Qian said at a regular press conference on August 27, 2020 that recent Chinese military exercises were routine and did not target at any country.
Based on publicly available information, it could be said this year’s PLA drill in the South China Sea will likely feature anti-ship exercises, Xu Guangyu, a senior adviser to the China Arms Control and Disarmament Association, told the Global Times on Thursday.
Both ship-based and land-based anti-ship missiles, including the missiles in the DF series, have a long range, and that is why the exercise requires such a large area, Xu said, noting that this year’s exercise could be an enhanced version based on the one conducted last year.
Song Zhongping, a Chinese military expert and TV commentator, told the Global Times on Thursday that the PLA is advocating the concept of joint operations featuring multiple military services, which could include the PLA Rocket Force, and another live-fire anti-ship ballistic missile exercise is possible this year.
If not, the exercise would likely feature joint maritime and aerial forces, Song said.
“These exercises have already become routine near Chinese waters, with the aim of honing the PLA’s capabilities to fight and win wars under realistic combat scenarios,” Song said.
Fu Qianshao, a Chinese military aviation expert, told the Global Times on Thursday that while another “aircraft carrier killer” test is possible, it is still difficult to tell only by the navigation restriction notice.
It could instead feature ship-based, submarine-based or aircraft-based anti-ship missiles, or ship-based air defense missiles, Fu said, noting that the number of participating warships and warplanes could also be a factor to the large exercise zone.
China’s second aircraft carrier, the Shandong, was in the South China Sea for exercises last week, US media outlet thedrive.com reported, citing foreign satellite images.
File photo taken on Sept. 3, 2015 shows DF-26 missiles attending a military parade in Beijing, capital of China. It has been a big year for China’s military as the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is to celebrate its 90th birthday. As Aug. 1, the birthday of the PLA, approaches, the country’s army has shown how much its military capacity has grown and how committed it is to maintaining world peace. The PLA has come a long way since its birth during the armed uprising in the city of Nanchang on August 1, 1927, when it had only 20,000 soldiers. Ninety years later, the country boasts 2 million servicemen, according to a national defense white paper titled China’s Military Strategy, published in 2015. Besides the growth in numbers, the PLA has armed its soldiers with world-class equipment. As of June 2017, the Chinese military had participated in 24 UN peacekeeping missions, sending 31,000 personnel, 13 of whom lost their lives in duty. Since 2008, the Navy has dispatched 26 escort task force groups, including more than 70 ships for escort missions in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia. More than 6,300 Chinese and foreign ships have been protected during these missions. (Xinhua)
File photo taken on Sept. 3, 2015 shows DF-26 missiles attending a military parade in Beijing, capital of China. It has been a big year for China’s military as the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) is to celebrate its 90th birthday. As Aug. 1, the birthday of the PLA, approaches, the country’s army has shown how much its military capacity has grown and how committed it is to maintaining world peace. The PLA has come a long way since its birth during the armed uprising in the city of Nanchang on August 1, 1927, when it had only 20,000 soldiers. Ninety years later, the country boasts 2 million servicemen, according to a national defense white paper titled “China’s Military Strategy,” published in 2015. Besides the growth in numbers, the PLA has armed its soldiers with world-class equipment. As of June 2017, the Chinese military had participated in 24 UN peacekeeping missions, sending 31,000 personnel, 13 of whom lost their lives in duty. Since 2008, the Navy has dispatched 26 escort task force groups, including more than 70 ships for escort missions in the Gulf of Aden and off the coast of Somalia. More than 6,300 Chinese and foreign ships have been protected during these missions. (Xinhua)
Pointed warning
No matter what training subjects will be featured in the upcoming exercise, it comes at a time when China is facing military provocations from the US and several other countries.
The US kicked off on Tuesday the Large Scale Exercise 2021 naval and amphibious exercise billed as the largest of its kind in 40 years, US military media outlet the Stars and Stripes reported, saying that it aims to send a message to Russia and China.
Featuring units in 17 different time zones, the exercise attempts to show that the US can simultaneously address challenges in the Black Sea, eastern Mediterranean Sea, South China Sea and East China Sea and shut down efforts to spread US military forces thin, and that the US can prevent China from reunifying the island of Taiwan or landing on the Diaoyu Islands, the report quoted a US scholar as saying.
The US has also been holding the Large Scale Global Exercise 21 with UK, Australian and Japanese forces since Monday, the US Indo-Pacific Command said.
A UK aircraft carrier strike group led by the HMS Queen Elizabeth carrier sailed through the South China Sea on Monday, with a German warship, the Bayern frigate, setting sail on the same day also for the South China Sea.
India is another country that plans to send warships to the South China Sea, as four Indian destroyers and a frigate will be deployed for a two-month period to Southeast Asia, the South China Sea and the western Pacific, Reuters reported on Wednesday, citing the China-India border question since clashes last year.
Against this backdrop, China’s large-scale exercise in the South China Sea is a pointed response that warns these provocateurs, Song said.
They are like hungry wolves that have been frequently stirring up troubles and challenging China’s core interests, Song said.
“China holding military exercises is like readying a hunting rifle and striking back at the wolves,” Song said, noting that a good rifle is necessary.
Xu said that the PLA’s exercise has perfect timing, as it will show on a strategic level that China is not afraid of anyone, and even warships from a hundred countries coming to the South China Sea will not shake its determination to safeguard national sovereignty and security.
Of all those countries, the PLA exercise is a warning to the US, which is the one that rallied the gang, Xu said.
It is a common understanding among foreign and Chinese military analysts that the PLA has the upper hand if a war breaks out on China’s doorsteps, be it in the South China Sea, the East China Sea or the Taiwan Straits, even against powerful opponents like the US and its allies.
The large-scale exercise in the South China Sea is not the only drill the PLA will conduct, as the Maritime Safety Administration has announced several more drills in the Bohai Strait, the Yellow Sea, and other locations in the South China Sea.
From Monday to August 13, China and Russia will hold the Zapad/Interaction-2021 exercise in the Qingtongxia Combined Arms Tactical Training Base in Northwest China’s Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, which will feature more than 10,000 personnel, multiple types of aircraft, artillery pieces and armored equipment with the aim of testing joint reconnaissance, early warning, electronic information attack and strike capabilities.
In addition to displaying China’ and Russia’s roles as major powers in jointly safeguarding regional peace and stability in Central Asia following the US’ irresponsible troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, the joint exercise will also enhance military cooperation under the context that both countries are facing suppression by the US, a Chinese expert on international affairs who requested anonymity told the Global Times.
China to provide 2 billion doses of vaccine to world this year by Leng Shumei and Hu Yuwei Aug 05 2021
China on Thursday vowed to make efforts to provide the world with 2 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines this year and donate $100 million to COVAX to promote global vaccine provision amid the rampaging Delta variant, which is bringing about more challenges for developing countries to access vaccines and combat the pandemic while the West continues to drag its heels in fulfilling its promises.
Chinese President Xi Jinping made the announcement Thursday night in a written address to the first meeting of a forum on international cooperation on COVID-19 vaccines.
Xi said he expects the forum to further boost fair vaccine accessibility worldwide, boost solidarity among developing countries and contribute to the success in the fight against the novel coronavirus.
Developing countries are facing three main challenges: the low accessibility to vaccines, the declining efficacy of existing vaccines against mutations, and the competition between different producers on the international market, making it more difficult for developing countries to choose vaccines, Zha Daojiong, a professor of international political economy in the School of International Studies and Institute of South-South Cooperation and Development at Peking University, told the Global Times on Thursday.
“Cooperation on vaccines is limited not only in providing finished products, but also jointly producing vaccines,” Zha noted. He said that the Thursday conference will promote more cooperation between Chinese and foreign producers, leading to overseas production of China-developed vaccines in order to increase production capacity, and save time and costs for international transportation.
Chinese experts noted that the conference served as an opportunity for developing countries to communicate with each other and come up with solutions to the challenges they are facing in accessing vaccines.
China is able to produce 5 billion doses of COVID-19 vaccines per year and only needs half of them to vaccinate its 1.4 billion people. This means China is able to provide the world with a large amount of vaccines, Tao Lina, a Shanghai-based vaccine expert, told the Global Times on Thursday.
The key work in the current stage is to unite the international community and put aside ideological divergences to combat the pandemic to provide the world with vaccines of the highest efficacy, Tao noted.
Key global support
The international community has been working together to ensure accessibility and equity of vaccine distribution in developing countries. However, inequity between rich and poor regions in access to vaccines continues to worsen due to unbalanced resource distribution and the West’s slowness in realizing its promise to assist poor regions.
To date, 82 percent of all COVID-19 vaccine doses that have gone into arms worldwide have been administered in high-income and upper-middle-income countries. By contrast, less than 1 percent have been administered in low-income countries. Meanwhile, COVAX, the multinational vaccine facility, is struggling to meet this challenge, having distributed only 153 million doses out of 4.1 billion administered worldwide, according to data tracked by the Duke University.
While more than half of all Americans have had at least one dose and dozens of rich countries aren’t far behind, less than 1 percent of people across the world’s low-income countries have been vaccinated.
Meanwhile, the African continent’s vaccination rates are still painfully low: Just 16 million, or less than 2 percent, of Africa’s 1.3 billion people are now fully vaccinated, according to AP.
While rich countries are hoping to vaccinate 70 percent of their populations, most developing countries are struggling with the vaccine demand-supply gap – they still lack about billions of shots needed to vaccinate 30 percent of their population by the end of this year, Feng Duojia, president of the China Vaccine Industry Association, told the Global Times on Thursday.
China will become the world’s most important vaccine provider with the largest number and the most selection of products, Feng noted.
In addition to expanding production, Chinese authorities and producers have also been accelerating research and development of vaccines to deal with the rapidly mutating virus as the world is dragged into a third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic due to the rampaging Delta variant, which has been found to be much more infectious than the original variant.
West slow to fulfill promise
US President Joe Biden said Tuesday that the US, which has been accused of hoarding many more doses than it needs, has shipped more than 110 million COVID-19 vaccine doses to 65 countries and regions, following regulatory and logistical setbacks. The figures come about one month behind the White House’s June goal of delivering 80 million doses overseas, part of a greater vaccine-donation drive by the US in the coming months.
In addition to the slow move to make good on their promises, US producers are also increasing prices for their products while the shots are becoming more and more urgently needed amid the rampaging Delta variant, putting more pressure and worries on developing countries seeking access to vaccines.
Pfizer has raised the price of its COVID-19 vaccine by more than one-quarter and Moderna by more than one-tenth in the latest EU supply contracts, as Europe battled supply disruptions and concerns over side effects from rival products, Financial Times reported on August 1.
Even though the US said it would donate vaccines to developing countries, they will be donating products that can’t be sold in their domestic market or that have not been approved for domestic use such as the AstraZeneca vaccine, a Beijing-based immunologist told the Global Times on condition of anonymity.
Without Chinese vaccines, there would be fewer choices for developing countries and regions, and more inequity in global vaccine distribution, the expert said.
China has taken important steps to close the global vaccine gap, including the acceleration of large-scale production, boosting fair distribution and licensing local production in more countries.
Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi attended the ASEAN Plus Three Foreign Ministers’ Meeting on Tuesday via video link. At the meeting he revealed that China had provided more than 750 million doses of vaccines overseas and will provide another 110 million shots to COVAX in the following four months. China will also provide 3 billion dollars to the international community in the next three years.
So far, the shots and semi-finished shots China provided to the world account for one-sixth of the total administered worldwide. China has exported 227 percent of that of Europe and 84 times that of the US, according to a report on the Global Use of COVID-19 Vaccines (Report), release by the Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China on July 29.
China has mainly provided vaccines to four geographical regions – a total of 104 countries and regions around the world. Out of these four regions, the Asia-Pacific has received the largest number of Chinese vaccines, with 38 countries receiving vaccines from China. Latin America has received the second largest number, with only 19 countries receiving these vaccines. There are 37 countries in Africa that have received vaccines from China.
According to officially released data, China has donated 304.9 million doses to the Asia-Pacific regions, 180.9 million doses to Latin America and 45.5 million doses to Africa, while the US had donated only 23.8 million, 27.5 million and 18.3 million to these regions respectively.
At the 73rd World Health Assembly held in May, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced that China would make its vaccines global public goods, the earliest commitment made in the world to narrowing the vaccine gap. As early as November 2020, Sao Paulo in Brazil received the first batch of Chinese vaccines. By March 2021, China had provided or was providing vaccine aid to 53 countries.
Meanwhile, the US prioritized their domestic needs in the early stages of the pandemic and refused to provide help to India, a major source of vaccines at that time, to facilitate its vaccine production. The US did not start assisting other countries with shots until March 18 amid a flood of international accusations over its failure to assume its responsibility as a great power.
China has also been transferring technology to developing countries and has been helping them establish domestic production lines.
According to the website of the Chinese government, Chinese vaccine producers have built production lines in the United Arab Emirates, Egypt, Indonesia, Turkey and Brazil, with total production capacity at these lines exceeding 200 million doses per year.
For developing countries, the difficulty in accessing vaccines not only lies in finance but also storage and transportation. “Some developing countries have very complex topography and bad traffic, which will prevent vaccines from being smoothly delivered. Some countries also need help in training and hiring doctors and nurses,” Zha noted.
Unlike Western countries, China is not only giving developing countries fish but also teaching them how to fish. Zhan warned that there could possibly be another pandemic after COVID-19, so it is very important for developing countries to increase their ability in producing and using vaccines themselves.
WASHINGTON (Sputnik) – US President Joe Biden has signed a memorandum that provides a temporary safe haven to the residents of Hong Kong, the White House spokesperson Jen Psaki announced on Thursday.
Really? Is it for 80, 80,000 or 800,000 and why not for all 8,000,000 Hongkongers. It is straightly for show only kind of BS!
If US care so much about the Muslims in Xinjiang, why not provide safe haven for the 12,000,000 Xinjiang Muslims in the US? If US love the Muslims so much, why bomb them throughout the Middle East.
Kiji Noh in San Francisco: Yes, token, dainty, microscopic actions. But he won’t do more, just as the US–and all other Western nations–will not pass legislation for Uighur immigration, even though they shriek “genocide”. Odd, isn’t it?
Professor Ling-chi Wang of UC Berkeley: Agree. What Biden just signed is hypocrisy. Why limit to an unspecified, imaginary, possibly non-existent number? To be honest and truthful, assuming the political conditions of Hong Kong is as bad and repressive as he imagines and claims, he should open the door to all the people in Hong Kong!
Video: The New York Times, mouthpiece for US Government: You Are Wrong Again! The New York Times Accused China of being a machine to reap as many gold medals as possible. China has a different answer. 紐約時報，美國政府喉舌：你又錯了！ 《紐約時報》指責中國是一台收穫盡可能多金牌的機器。 中國有不同的答案. 🇨🇳 China rank#1 by Official Olympic Website (ignore New York Times ranking, it is not accurate) 中國在奧運官方網站排名#1（不要看紐約時報排名, 並不准確）
https://vimeo.com/583356007
https://youtu.be/hUZuJpMAZ9c
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/541941707029159/?d=n
Johnson Choi Biz