Qian Xuesen – Father of China’s Rocket and Space Program. To use my knowledge to change Chinese people destiny – I want Chinese people to possess her own nuclear bomb and missles despite the controversy

Qian Xuesen – Father of China’s Rocket and Space Program. To use my knowledge to change Chinese people destiny – I want Chinese people to possess her own nuclear bomb and missles despite the controversy – I personally think – We are preparing against aggression*** – not owning a sword and has a sword and not using it is an entirely different matter.”

***United States “China containment policy” since 1949, known as “Asia Pivot” or “Freedom of Navigation” since Obama Administration is to engage in provocation activities in China’s territorial water or at China’s door steps to stop China’s rise

Qian Xuesen 钱学森: “用我的知識來改變中國人的命運 – 我想中國人擁有她自己的核彈和飛彈 – 儘管它的存在性帶來質疑和爭議 – 我個人認為 – 我們正準備反抗侵略 – 手上沒有劍和手上有劍而不使用它 不是一回事. 美國自1949年以來圍堵中國政䇿,從奧巴馬總統行政時代稱亞洲再平衡也稱自由航行,目的是在中國領海或國家門前進行挑釁阻止中國崛起。

Qian Xuesen 钱学森 The Movie 钱学森 Hsue-shen Tsien 高清国语中英双字
https://youtu.be/rDXrDXuDp9E

Qian Xuesen 钱学森 – Father of China’s Rocket and Space Program

Qian Xuesen (simplified Chinese: 钱学森; traditional Chinese: 錢學森; pinyin: Qián Xuésēn; Wade–Giles: Ch’ien Hsüeh-sęn) (11 December 1911 – 31 October 2009) was a scientist who made important contributions to the missile and space programs of both the United States and People’s Republic of China. Historical documents in the U. S. commonly refer to him with the earlier family-name last spelling, Hsue-Shen Tsien or H.S. Tsien.[1]

During the 1940s Qian was one of the founders of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory[2] at the California Institute of Technology. During the Second Red Scare of the 1950s, the United States government accused Qian of having communist sympathies, and he was stripped of his security clearance[3] in 1950. Qian then decided to return to China, but instead was detained at Terminal Island[4] near Los Angeles. After spending 5 years under virtual house arrest,[5] Qian was released in 1955, in exchange for the repatriation of American pilots captured during the Korean War. Notified by U.S. authorities that he was free to go, Qian immediately arranged his departure, leaving for China in September 1955, on the passenger liner SS President Cleveland of American President Lines, via Hong Kong. He returned to lead the Chinese rocket program, and became known as the “Father of Chinese Rocketry” (or “King of Rocketry”).[6]

He is also the cousin of the mechanical engineer Hsue-Chu Tsien and his son (first cousin once removed) is the 2008 Nobel Prize in chemistry winner Roger Y. Tsien. Asteroid 3763 Qianxuesen and the ill-fated space ship Tsien in the science fiction novel 2010: Odyssey Two are named after him.

Early life and education

Qian Xuesen (Wade–Giles: Ch’ien Hsüeh-sęn) was born in Hangzhou, the capital of Zhejiang province, 180 km southwest of Shanghai. He left Hangzhou at the age of three, when his father obtained a post in the Ministry of Education in Beijing. Qian graduated from Chiao Tung University (now spelled Jiao Tong) in Shanghai in 1934 and received a degree in mechanical engineering, with an emphasis on railroad administration; he then spent an internship at Nanchang Air Force Base. In August 1935 Qian left China on a Boxer Rebellion Indemnity Scholarship to study mechanical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and earned a Master of Science degree from MIT a year later.

While at MIT he was influenced by the methods of American engineering education, and its focus on experimentation. Qian’s experiments included the plotting of plot pressures, using mercury filled manometers. (By contrast, most engineers in China at this time were not the “hands on” type; instead, theoretical studies were preferred.) Qian sought a school where his mathematical skills would be appreciated, and went to the California Institute of Technology to pursue his studies under Theodore von Kármán. Qian earned his doctorate from Caltech in 1939 with a thesis on slender body theory at high speeds. He would remain on the Caltech faculty until his departure for China in 1955, becoming the Robert H. Goddard Professor of Jet Propulsion in 1949, and establishing a reputation as one of the leading rocket scientists in the United States.[7]

It was shortly after arriving at Caltech in 1936 that Qian was attracted to the rocketry ideas of Frank Malina, other students of von Kármán, and their associates, including Jack Parsons. Around Caltech the dangerous and explosive nature of their work earned them the nickname “Suicide Squad.”[7]

Career in the United States

In 1943, Qian and two others in the Caltech rocketry group drafted the first document to use the name Jet Propulsion Laboratory; it was a proposal to the Army for developing missiles in response to Germany’s V-2 rocket. This led to the Private A, which flew in 1944, and later the Corporal, the WAC Corporal, and other designs.

After World War II he served under von Kármán as a consultant to the United States Army Air Force, and commissioned with the assimilated rank of colonel. Von Kármán and Tsien both were sent by the Army to Germany to investigate the progress of wartime aerodynamics research. Qian investigated research facilities and interviewed German scientists including Wernher von Braun and Rudolph Hermann.[8] Von Kármán wrote of Qian, “At the age of 36, he was an undisputed genius whose work was providing an enormous impetus to advances in high-speed aerodynamics and jet propulsion.”[2] The American journal Aviation Week & Space Technology would name Qian its Person of the Year in 2007, and comment on his interrogation of von Braun, “No one then knew that the father of the future U.S. space program was being quizzed by the father of the future Chinese space program.”[9]

During this time, Colonel Qian worked on designing an intercontinental space plane. His work would inspire the X-20 Dyna-Soar, which itself would later influence the development of the American Space Shuttle.

Qian Xuesen married Jiang Ying (蒋英), a famed opera singer and the daughter of Jiang Baili (蒋百里) and his wife, Japanese nurse Satô Yato. The elder Jiang was a military strategist and adviser to Kuomintang leader Chiang Kai-shek. The Qians were married on September 14, 1947 in Shanghai, and would have two children; their son Qian Yonggang was born in Boston on October 13, 1948, while their daughter Qian Yungjen was born in early 1950, when the family was residing in Pasadena.[10]

Shortly after his wedding, Qian returned to America, to take up a teaching position at MIT; Jiang Ying would join him in December 1947.[11] In 1949, upon the recommendation of von Kármán, Qian became the first director of the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Center at Caltech.[7]

Imprisonment

In 1949,when he was applying for naturalization[12], allegations were made that he was a communist, and his security clearance was revoked in June 1950.[5] The Federal Bureau of Investigation located an American Communist Party document from 1938 with his name on it, and used it as justification for the revocation. Without clearance, Qian found himself unable to pursue his career, and within two weeks announced plans to return to mainland China, which had come under the government of Communist leader Mao Zedong. After Qian’s plans became known, the U.S. government detained him at Terminal Island, an isolated U.S. Navy facility and federal prison near the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. The Undersecretary of the Navy at the time, Dan A. Kimball, tried to keep Qian in the U.S., commenting:

“It was the stupidest thing this country ever did. He was no more a Communist than I was, and we forced him to go.”[3]

Release and exile

Qian became the subject of five years of secret diplomacy and negotiation between the U.S. and China. During this time he lived under constant surveillance with the permission to teach without any research (classified) duties.[5] Qian found himself in conflict with both the FBI and the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, and at one point was arrested for allegedly smuggling secret documents out of the US; these ultimately turned out to be simple logarithmic tables. During his incarceration, Qian received support from his colleagues at Caltech, including the institute’s president Lee DuBridge, who flew to Washington to argue Qian’s case. Caltech appointed attorney Grant Cooper to defend Qian. Later, Cooper would say, “That the government permitted this genius, this scientific genius, to be sent to Communist China to pick his brains is one of the tragedies of this century.”[13]

Career in China

Qian, exiled to China, had a successful career there, leading and becoming the father of the Chinese missile program with the construction of China’s Dongfeng ballistic missiles and the Long March space rockets. A book about this scientist’s life was written by Iris Chang, entitled Thread of the Silkworm.

Return to China

In 1979 Qian was awarded Caltech’s Distinguished Alumni Award. In the early 1990s the filing cabinets containing Qian’s research work were offered to him by Caltech. Most of these works became the foundation for the Qian Library at Xi’an Jiaotong University while the rest went to the Institute of Mechanics. Qian eventually received his award from Caltech, and with the help of his friend Frank Marble brought it to his home in a widely-covered ceremony. Qian was also invited to visit the US by AIAA after the normalization of Sino-US relationship, but he refused the invitation, having wanted a formal apology for his detention. In a 2002 published reminiscence, Marble stated that he believed that Qian had “lost faith in the American government” but that he had “always had very warm feelings for the American people.”[14]

Qian retired in 1991 and maintained a low public profile in Beijing, China.

The PRC government launched its manned space program in 1992 with much help from Russia (due to their extended history in space) and used Qian’s research as the basis for the Long March rocket which successfully launched the Shenzhou V mission in October 2003. The elderly Qian was able to watch China’s first manned space mission on television from his hospital bed.
Science fiction author Arthur C. Clarke, in his novel 2010: Odyssey Two, named a Chinese spaceship after him.

Later life

In his later years, since the 1980s, Qian advocated scientific investigation of traditional Chinese medicine, Qigong and “special human body functions”. Some people claim that Qian actually did not spend his effort[clarification needed] on qigong, but that he just expressed that people should consider the widely practiced qigong in a scientific manner. He particularly encouraged scientists to accumulate observational data on qigong for the establishment of future theories.[15]

From the early 1980s he studied in a number of areas, and created systematics, contributed on science and technology system and somatic science, thinking science, natural sciences, engineering science, literature and art, military science, systems science, geography science, social science, and education.

Advanced the concepts, theory and method on system science: open complex giant system, from qualitative to quantitative integration of Hall for Workshop of comprehensive and integrated system,[16][17] and opened up a Chinese school of the Science of Complexity. Organizated scientific seminars and train successors.[18]

In 2008, he was named Aviation Week and Space Technology Person of the Year. This selection is not intended as an honour but is given to the person judged to have the greatest impact on aviation in the past year.[2][19]

In 2008, China Central Television named Qian as one of the eleven most inspiring people in China.[20] He died at the age of 97 on October 31, 2009 in Beijing.[21][22]

In July 2009, the Omega Alpha Association named Qian (H. S. Tsien) one of four Honorary Members in the international systems engineering honor society.[23]

A Chinese film production 钱学森 预告片 (陈坤主演) Qian Xue Sen directed by Zhang Jianya stars Zhang Tielin as Qian Xue to be release on 11 December 2011 in both Asia and North America.

OBITUARY

November 1, 2009

Qian Xuesen dies at 98; rocket scientist helped establish Jet Propulsion Laboratory By Claire Noland

Qian Xuesen, seen in 1948, a Chinese-born aeronautical engineer educated at Caltech and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was credited with leading China to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles, Silkworm anti-ship missiles, weather and reconnaissance satellites and to put a human in space in 2003. (Associated Press)

Deported in 1955 on suspicion of being a Communist, the aeronautical engineer educated at Caltech became known as the father of China’s space and missile programs.

Qian Xuesen, a former Caltech rocket scientist who helped establish the Jet Propulsion Laboratory before being deported in 1955 on suspicion of being a Communist and who became known as the father of China’s space and missile programs, has died. He was 98.

Qian, also known as Tsien Hsue-shen, died Saturday in Beijing, China’s state news agency reported. The cause was not given.

Honored in his homeland for his “eminent contributions to science,” Qian was credited with leading China to launch intercontinental ballistic missiles, Silkworm anti-ship missiles, weather and reconnaissance satellites and to put a human in space in 2003.

The man deemed responsible for these technological feats also was labeled a spy in the 1999 Cox Report issued by Congress after an investigation into how classified information had been obtained by the Chinese.

Qian, a Chinese-born aeronautical engineer educated at Caltech and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, was a protege of Caltech’s eminent professor Theodore von Karman, who recognized him as an outstanding mathematician and “undisputed genius.”

Qian’s research contributed to the development of “jet-assisted takeoff” technology that the military began using in the 1940s.

He was the founding director of the Daniel and Florence Guggenheim Jet Propulsion Center at Caltech and a member of the university’s so-called Suicide Squad of rocket experimenters who laid the groundwork for testing done by JPL.

But his brilliant career in the United States came to a screeching halt in 1950, when the FBI accused him of being a member of a subversive organization. Qian packed up eight crates of belongings and set off for Shanghai, saying he and his wife and two young children wanted to visit his aging parents back home. Federal agents seized the containers, which they claimed contained classified materials, and arrested him on suspicion of subversive activity.

Qian denied any Communist leanings, rejected the accusation that he was trying to spirit away secret information and initially fought deportation. He later changed course, however, and sought to return to China.

Five years after his arrest, he was shipped off in an apparent exchange for 11 American airmen captured during the Korean War.

“I do not plan to come back,” Qian told reporters. “I have no reason to come back. . . . I plan to do my best to help the Chinese people build up the nation to where they can live with dignity and happiness.”

Welcomed as a national hero in China, where the Communist regime had defeated the Nationalist forces, Qian became director of China’s rocket research and was named to the Central Committee of the Communist Party. China, whose scientific development lagged during the Communist revolution, quickly began making strides.

Qian was born in the eastern city of Hangzhou, and in 1934 graduated from Jiaotong University in Shanghai, where he studied mechanical engineering. He won a scholarship to MIT and, after earning a master’s degree in aeronautical engineering there, continued his doctoral studies at Caltech.

He taught at MIT and Caltech and, having received a security clearance, served on the Scientific Advisory Board that advised the U.S. military during and after World War II.

Sent to Germany to interrogate Nazi scientists, Qian interviewed rocket scientist Wernher von Braun. As the trade magazine Aviation Week put it in 2007, upon naming Qian its person of the year, “No one then knew that the father of the future U.S. space program was being quizzed by the father of the future Chinese space program.”

Qian returned to Caltech in 1949 and a year later faced the accusation by two former members of the Los Angeles Police Department’s “Red Squad” that he was a card-carrying member of the Communist Party.

He admitted that while a graduate student in the 1930s he had been present at social gatherings organized by colleagues who also were accused of party membership, but he denied any political involvement.

Few can agree on the question of whether Qian was a spy. An examination of the papers Qian packed away failed to turn up any classified documents. Colleagues at Caltech firmly stood behind him, and he continued to do research there after he lost his security clearance. In fact, the university gave him its distinguished alumni award in 1979 in recognition of his pioneering work in rocket science.

Although federal officials started deportation procedures in 1950, he was prevented from leaving the country because it was decided that he knew too much about sensitive military matters that could be of use to an enemy.

For years, Qian was in a sort of limbo, being watched closely by the U.S. government and living under partial house arrest. Eventually he quit fighting his expulsion and actively worked to return to China. Some associates said that he was insulted because his loyalty to this country was questioned and that he initially wanted to clear his name.

Once he returned home in 1955, he threw himself into his research with what some saw as calculated revenge.

“It was the stupidest thing this country ever did,” former Navy Secretary Dan Kimball later said, according to Aviation Week. “He was no more a Communist than I was, and we forced him to go.”

Qian survived the Cultural Revolution of the 1960s, when many Chinese intellectuals lost their positions, probably because his scientific research and development for military purposes was considered too vital to suspend.

He is said to have supported the government’s crushing of the rebellion in Tiananmen Square in 1989. And he never returned to the United States.

Information on survivors was not immediately available.

claire.noland@latimes.com

The Imperial Edict of Emperor Daoguang

The Imperial Edict of Emperor Daoguang 清朝禁烟的道光聖旨-英譯2021/11/06

奉天承運 皇帝詔曰:

英夷入犯吾南海口岸
其地之民乃處水深火熱之中
商賈亦有所損爾
尤為甚者毒品之害
尤為甚也有損大清之威耳
故欽命林則徐入兩廣及口岸
查外夷之滋事者
立究不怠
尤對涉毒品者
以大清律究除不怠
其貨收入國庫
以示懲之

欽 此

道光十年九月十日(1830)

英文翻譯

The Imperial Edict of Emperor Daoguang

In the name of God and under the wills of Heaven
The imperial edict is issued below:

Barbaric Britain has invaded the harbors at our South China sea
People there are in deep water and under dumpster fires
That has caused damages in the commodities market
The harm by drugs is particularly serious
Even more harm to the creditability of great China
I hence appoint Lin Zexu entering two Guang states and harbors
Investigate all barbaric foreigners who involved illegal activities
And prosecute them without hesitation
Those drug dealers, in particular
Must be punished based on the law of Great China
All their illegal merchandises must be confiscated
So let the verdict of guilty known by public

By the Emperor

Daoguang 10.9.10 (1830)

JSLieh, 2021.11.06

【註】詔書頒發約10年後(1940年),一個自稱是基督教國家的英國佬,竟然為了販賣鴉片毒品,盜取不義之財向清政府開戰,一個不可饒恕、毒害中國人的不義之戰就這樣開始了!

第一次鴉片戰爭
https://baike.baidu.hk/item/%E7%AC%AC%E4%B8%80%E6%AC%A1%E9%B4%89%E7%89%87%E6%88%B0%E7%88%AD/880169
第二次鴉片戰爭
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E6%AC%A1%E9%B8%A6%E7%89%87%E6%88%98%E4%BA%89
訪談:鴉片戰爭的起源和影響
https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20180704/opium-war-book-china-britain/zh-hant/

Video: Canadian KOL: China’s people’s democracy makes people’s lives better, not so for US and Canada Money Democracy

Video: Canadian KOL: China’s people’s democracy makes people’s lives better, not so for US and Canada Money Democracy 加拿大KOL:中國的人民民主讓人民生活更美好,美國和加拿大的金錢民主則做不到.

Kirk Apesland, a Canadian living in China for 18 years, is also a vlogger who loves to share his life in the country. Apesland says he has discovered that the Chinese people have genuinely participated in China’s people’s democracy, and the people’s lives have significantly improved.
https://vimeo.com/643651226
https://youtu.be/d208C-UH_7s
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/600276847862311/?d=n

Chip data request latest instance of US hegemony, may hit legal snags. US going to destroy them like French Alstom and ruin them like Japan’s Toshiba

Chip data request latest instance of US hegemony, may hit legal snags. US going to destroy them like French Alstom and ruin them like Japan’s Toshiba 芯片數據請求美國霸權的最新實例,可能會遇到法律障礙。 美國要像法國的阿爾斯通一樣,像日本的東芝一樣摧毀它們.

Some of the world’s largest chipmakers including Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) have responded to a contentious US government request to submit chip data ahead of the Monday deadline, in a move described by industry observers as yet another instance of US hegemony that coerces global semiconductor supply chains to bow to arbitrary requirements way beyond commercial standards.

The information request, seen as a possible maneuver to target China, a thorn in the flesh for US desire for chip leadership, could create more problems than it solves, analysts said, noting that the affected businesses can resort to legal action in case of damage caused.

As of press time Monday, 23 entities, including TSMC, Micron Technology, Western Digital, United Microelectronics Corporation, and Shinko Electric Industries, had submitted supply chain-related information, according to a list of submissions filed with regulations.gov.

The TSMC response, dated November 5, was an anonymous comment with confidential business information, according to the website.

The Taiwan-based chip giant said Monday that no detailed information on customers was disclosed, Reuters reported.

TSMC did not respond to the Global Times request for comment as of press time.

South Korean tech firms are preparing for a “voluntary submission,” Bloomberg reported on Sunday, citing a South Korean finance ministry statement.

Samsung and SK Hynix remain missing from the list of submitters by press time.

Political trickery

The request, unveiled by the US Commerce Department in late September, smacks of an attempt to contain China’s tech rise under the disguise of addressing chip shortages, according to industry insiders.

It remains obscure as to what might be next on the US government agenda after the collection of chip supply chain information, but it seems almost for sure that such a request aims at cornering Chinese tech firms, a semiconductor industry insider told the Global Times on Sunday on condition of anonymity.

TSMC and other possible submitters such as Samsung have partnerships with Chinese firms including Huawei. What the US requests to submit largely falls under commercial secrets and products parameters of some Chinese mainland firms are among them, the insider said, arguing against the unreasonable request.

Elucidating its information request as an effort to identify “data gaps and bottlenecks in the supply chain, and potential inconsistent demand signals,” the US Commerce Department enumerated a flurry of questions in its September notice for wide-ranging parties including domestic and foreign chip design firms, materials and equipment suppliers and end-users that intrude into client information.

For instance, among the information and data it’s seeking from semiconductor product designers, manufacturers and microelectronics assemblers, and their suppliers is “for any integrated circuits you produce – whether fabricated at your own facilities or elsewhere – identify the primary integrated circuit type, product type, relevant technology nodes (in nanometers), and actuals or estimates of annual sales for the years 2019, 2020, and 2021 based on anticipated end use.”

These are relatively important business secrets, given that information such as orders and prices are very important in an industry, and a lot of company information can also be revealed from it, including the company’s product plans, maturity, and expected prices, a chip industry expert surnamed Zhao with Southeast University told the Global Times on Monday.

The information request came after a White House report in June that included a 100-day supply chain review of semiconductors and advanced packaging, as mandated by a presidential executive order in February. The report, with multiple mentions of China, identified dependence on China for sales revenue as one of the key risks pertaining to chip fabrication.

It’s actually a routine practice that for each order, customers are required to fill in basic product information in accordance with US Commerce Department requirements. But that is nowhere comparable to the specifics as listed in the September notice, a Chinese firm acting as an authorized agent for a major global semiconductor manufacturer focused on the auto sector revealed to the Global Times on Monday.

Problem creator, not solver

The politically motivated request could by no means address chip shortage woes and is likely to hit legal snags and be met with legal action from Chinese firms in the event of losses, analysts said.

TSMC, among chipmakers with manufacturing capacities in the US, had been grappling with the supply chain disclosure, despite their eventual compromise, according to the industry insider.

The US request does no good for either China or the US, as well as the global semiconductor industry, the insider added, stressing that a possible US attempt to shift chip factories to the US would mean much higher logistics costs.

China, home to diversified semiconductor supply chains, purchases $300 billion of chips from the US and elsewhere, industry data showed, with a considerable part of them processed and manufactured in China before exporting to other countries and regions.

Based on the takeaways from the insider’s previous communication with US equipment makers, the US semiconductor business community is actually sparing no effort to lobby the US government to strengthen cooperation with China, rather than the other way around, the industry veteran told the Global Times, disclosing that China accounts for at least 20 percent of US semiconductor manufacturers’ global market sales.

“The US government is politically motivated, rather than playing by commercial logic.”

Zhao noted that the US targets not only Chinese companies, but global companies, so the impact is great.

There should be no precedent for such data disclosure, and its legality is questionable, said Zhao.

If the US Department of Commerce requires chipmakers to provide user information, resulting in losses to related companies, then companies should unite and pursue legal action to safeguard their own interests, Zhao said.

In a successful instance of legal action taken by a Chinese firm against the US government, Chinese smartphone vendor Xiaomi in May reached an agreement with the US Department of Defense, under which the Pentagon will remove Xiaomi from its blacklist.

The agreement came after a US federal judge in March temporarily suspended enforcement of the blacklisting imposed under the Trump administration, after the Chinese tech firm filed a lawsuit against the US government, calling the blacklisting “unconstitutional.”

Moreover, Chinese firms could resort to the country’s anti-foreign sanctions law and the data security law in case of damage resulting from the data submission request and possible next steps, experts stressed.

When US and Western Empires doing all the talk talk talk, China get it done, promise made promise kept on Climate Change commitment.

When US and Western Empires doing all the talk talk talk, China get it done, promise made promise kept on Climate Change commitment. 當美國和西方帝國講空話, 天天吹水時, 中國做到了, 承諾兌現了對氣候變化的承諾.

From ‘airpocalypse’ to carbon cutter: China’s road to climate reckoning. In 2013, Beijing was blanketed in smog and relying on fossil fuels to drive its economy. Now the focus is on ‘high-quality development’ and working with other countries to cap emissions by Echo Xie, Nov 8 2021

For much of the past few decades, China’s growth has been powered by fossil fuels, particularly coal. While the economic gains have been vast and rapid, the toll on the environment has been huge. In the first of a four-part series, Echo Xie looks at how China has sought to change development gear over the last decade to combat pollution and see a more sustainable future.

It was less than a decade ago that Barbara Finamore struggled to make out some of the buildings across the street from her Beijing office.

The founder of the Natural Resources Defence Council’s China programme remembers that on particularly bad days in 2013, heavy pollution hung over the Chinese capital, blanketing the cityscape.

“When we first moved into that office [in the 1990s], we could see the buildings across the street. But during the ‘airpocalypse’, we couldn’t even see them,” she said.

Video: Michelle Wu won Boston Mayor’s race, but unlikely to solve Boston’s problems as she like others catered to the 1% elites…look at streets of Boston.

Video: Michelle Wu won Boston Mayor’s race, but unlikely to solve Boston’s problems as she like others catered to the 1% elites…look at streets of Boston. 吳弭贏得了波士頓市長的競選,但不太可能解決波士頓的問題,因為她像其他人一樣是為1% 的精英…看看波士頓的街道. 她做了好幾年Boston City Council Chairperson. City Council 是控制市政府財務而非市長. 希望我是錯的, 我可以肯定她未來四年不會有任何作為, 她下一步是做 US Senator, 當然這是要讓她的金主決定. 美國從來沒有民主, 祗有金錢民主.

Professor John V Walsh, MD, in San Francisco: BUT on the matter of Michelle Wu’s being a progressive, it depends on what one means.

She is a protege of Elizabeth Warren whose brand of progressivism means taking crumbs and selling out. She undercut the battle for Medicare For All and stabbed Bernie in the back, hoping to be the progressive choice for the Dem nomination. She has not said a single word about all the China bashing or the China Initiative.

We shall see how Wu does. But I do not have a lot of hope.


https://vimeo.com/643510441
https://youtu.be/HvBwVESP-2E
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/600121981211131/?d=n

Professor Kiji Noh in San Francisco: Hal Brands, the coauthor of this belligerent article, is not only a member of the hawkish rightwing think tank AEI, he is a member of CNAS. CNAS is the new PNAC.

Professor Kiji Noh in San Francisco: Hal Brands, the coauthor of this belligerent article, is not only a member of the hawkish rightwing think tank AEI, he is a member of CNAS. CNAS is the new PNAC.

PNAC (Project for the New American Century) were the neocon crazies who drove the US to senseless war in the middle east. They had dreams of global imperial domination.

CNAS (Center for a New American Security) are the neo-neocon crazies who are driving us to war with China. They, too, dream of continued US global domination.

Here is a detailed example of their strategy towards China: they envision and plan direct kinetic war with China, for example, multi-pronged strikes deep within Chinese territory as part of their 3 & 4th offset strategy.

“The United States can assure access to bastions within Chinese or Russian territory that were previously considered safe by forcing those geographically vast countries to spread out their defensive capabilities to the point of being porous or forcing them to concentrate limited resources around key infrastructure, thus creating large accessible holes in their outer defenses…new missiles could bring would help create opportunities to attack an enemy from multiple axes of approach, a true strategic advantage that needs to be re-established. It would force China and Russia, which possess large land masses and very long and dispersed territorial and maritime boundaries, to distribute scarce defensive resources accordingly and prepare for attack from disparate points of origin…Going forward with a strategic eye toward China and Russia, a well-designed future carrier air wing should return to its historical strategic focus of being able to hold targets deep inside the Eurasian land mass at risk.”

Note how these plans are oriented towards overcoming Chinese defensive capacity against US coercion and regime change, not responding to Chinese offensive threat.

“for the past 20 years nations such as China…have been making investments in new anti-access/area denial (A2/AD) capabilities that seek to push the United States back from their borders and limit its [the US’s] ability to coerce or bring about regime change”.

Since its inception in 2007, CNAS has a record of catastrophic failures: it architected and implemented the US’s corrupt, war-crime-based losing strategy in Afghanistan known as “COIN”. (Notice how the COIN documents at Brookings have now been scrubbed.)

CNAS’s Asher also exploded the six-party talks with NK by sanctioning it right after agreements were reached. This was the last good chance of de-escalation with NK. https://www.cnas.org/people/david-asher
It was the imperial brain trust for Obama’s criminal wars in Syria, Libya, and elsewhere. It is now Joe Biden’s privy war council.

CNAS was founded in 2007 by the architect of the Pivot to Asia, Kurt Campbell (Currently the Asia Czar in Biden’s administration) and Michelle “Sink China’s navy in 72 hrs” Flournoy. They originally started out at CSIS. Flournoy also went onto found WestExec with Anthony Blinken.

16 members of Biden’s top cabinet are CNAS: Eli Ratner (“Orient everything around war with China”), Rush Doshi (“Blunt China at all costs”), Victoria “F*ck the EU” Nuland, Avril Haines, Kurt Campbell (Asia Czar–China-NSC). Jake Sullivan (NSC), Wendy Sherman (under secretary of State), Laura Rosenberger (GMF/Alliance for Democracy), etc. Nick Burns is incoming as ambassador to China.
https://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Center_for_a_New_American_Security

They are supported by a rogues gallery of arms manufacturers.
https://www.cnas.org/support-cnas/cnas-supporters

Hal Brands is married to a Taiwanese woman, Elaine Chang, whose father (Matthew Chang) worked as Asst.V.P for the Japanese company Itochu, one of the funders of CNAS.

Video: Elon Mask tells US Military: China will overtake us in Military, Green Energy, electric vehicles and more

Video: Elon Mask tells US Military: China will overtake us in Military, Green Energy, electric vehicles and more… 埃隆馬斯克告訴美國軍方:中國將在軍事、綠色能源、電動汽車等方面超過我們…

Professor John V Walsh, MD, in San Francisco: China’s economy has been larger than that of the US since November, 2014, according to the PPP-GDP metric used by IMF, World Bank and CIA World Factbook – and it is growing faster.

In the pandemic putting lives above the economy turned out to be better for the economy also – to the surprise of the practitioners of the “science” of economics. China’s economy grew albeit more slowly; that of the US and all other major industrial nations contracted!

Military power grows out of economic power. I hope the US govt and Elite recognize this and decide to live in a multipolar world before it blows us all up.

Let’s hope so. We in the US have more to say about getting the Elite to embrace jsut a bit of sanity than anyone else. Let’s hope we can pull it off.


https://vimeo.com/643351649
https://youtu.be/Ul23zRrxA5c
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/599886814567981/?d=n

Another foolish move by US, huge windfall for Hong Kong. SCMP: Exclusive | Goldman’s top banker says many Chinese IPO clients considering shift to Hong Kong from US exchanges

Another foolish move by US, huge windfall for Hong Kong. SCMP: Exclusive | Goldman’s top banker says many Chinese IPO clients considering shift to Hong Kong from US exchanges 美國的又一個愚蠢舉動,給香港帶來了巨大的意外收穫。 南華早報:獨家| 高盛首席銀行家表示,許多中國 IPO 客戶考慮從美國交易所轉移到香港.

The tap has not been turned off for US listings but ‘balance of activity’ is coming to Hong Kong, regional investment banking co-head Drayton says. Hong Kong ranks third for global IPOs and secondary listings, behind Nasdaq and the NYSE so far this year, according to Refinitiv. But it is going to change big time!

https://www.scmp.com/business/banking-finance/article/3155176/goldmans-top-banker-says-many-chinese-ipo-clients