China Inner Mongolia is hiring high school teacher at US$93,000/yr with safe teaching environment and much better pay than Hawaii and California. 中國內蒙古正在以每年93,000美元聘用高中教師，教學環境安全，薪酬遠高於夏威夷和加利福尼亞.
China’s top respiratory diseases expert has defended the country’s zero-Covid strategy against scrutiny from some public health experts, saying it was still less costly than living with the disease and reintroducing restrictions each time outbreaks occurred.
Ronald Cutburth: MY LATE UNCLE: Started the China National Airlines. Meanwhile his former commanding General of the Flying Tigers started a private airlines. 我已故的叔叔：創辦了中國國家航空公司。 與此同時，他的前任飛虎隊總司令開辦了一家私人航空公司.
This is in China near the end and victory of the Peoples Liberation Army. Then as the PLA got closer they started flying Nationalist Chinese to Taiwan (Formosa). They flew thousands to Taiwan. That was around 1949. Things change. Both the mainland and Taiwan are more developed. Chinese everywhere are very productive and should work together for the prosperity of the world. I hope Taiwan re-bonds their families and avoid confrontation. Don’t let the US warmongers mislead you. The US capitalists have bankrupted the US and created more than 40 million people in poverty. We have now about 500 thousand homeless people in the US and it will grow in December when they evict more than 300 thousand from inability to pay their mortgage or rent. When the Democrats throw some cash at the people this does not solve the problems of poverty. Most people in America are in debt traps. The US Congress are mathematically and scientifically illiterate. So they let the Zionist news media lead them around.
這是在中國接近尾聲和中國人民解放軍的勝利。 然後隨著解放軍越來越近，他們開始將國民黨中國人飛往台灣（福爾摩沙）。 他們飛往台灣數千人。 那是在 1949 年左右。事情發生了變化。 大陸和台灣都比較發達。 世界各地的中國人都非常有生產力，應該為世界的繁榮而共同努力。 我希望台灣重新與家人團聚，避免對抗。 不要讓美國好戰分子誤導你。 美國資本家使美國破產，造成四千萬多人陷入貧困。 我們現在在美國有大約 50 萬無家可歸者，並且在 12 月他們將超過 30 萬因無力支付抵押貸款或租金而驅逐出境時，這一數字還會增加。 當民主黨向人民扔一些現金時，這並不能解決貧困問題。 大多數美國人都陷入債務陷阱。 美國國會在數學和科學上都是文盲。 所以他們讓猶太復國主義新聞媒體引導他們.
Dr. Ronald Cutburth. Xei xei
China’s return to UN and fight against US hegemony gave developing countries hope, said one of China’s first diplomats to the UN 中國首批駐聯合國外交官之一表示，中國重返聯合國和反抗美國霸權給發展中國家帶來希望by Lin Xiaoyi, Zhao Juecheng and Pang Yue, Nov 01 2021
Zhou Nan at the interview with the Global Times on October 28.
Editor’s Note: Fifty years ago, on November 1, 1971, the flag of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) was raised for the first time at the United Nations (UN) headquarters. Previously on October 25, the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) adopted Resolution 2758 by an overwhelming majority, deciding to restore all the rights of the PRC at the UN and to recognize the delegates of its government as the only legitimate representatives of China to the UN. In November of the same year, the first delegation of the PRC to the UN departed for New York, including first sectary and counselor Zhou Nan (Zhou), who later became deputy permanent representative to the UN, vice foreign minister, and head of the Chinese delegation to the China-British negotiations on Hong Kong issues. In an exclusive interview with Global Times reporters Lin Xiaoyi, Zhao Juecheng, and Pang Yue (GT), Zhou, who served as one of China’s first diplomats to the UN for 10 years from 1971 to 1981, recalled that the restoration of the PRC’s legal seat at the UN was driven by the changing international situation. And China’s return has made great contributions to the international community in safeguarding peace and justice. “Now China has already become a major supporter of the UN and its cooperation with the UN will embrace an infinitely brighter future,” he said.
An unexpected breakthrough
GT: Could you recall the moment of the restoration of the PRC’s lawful seat at the United Nations in 1971？
Zhou: China was able to resume its rightful seat in 1971, something that the US did not anticipate and neither did we.
The American thinking at the time was to put it off for as long as they could. When Henry Kissinger, who first visited China in October 1971, was leaving, he said that China could not get into the UN that year but it might be possible the following year. US politicians meant to delay China for a year but Kissinger knew that it would not be possible to hold us for a long time. In the end, Kissinger’s calculations were still wrong.
In fact, we did not expect it ourselves. At that time the first vote of the UNGA to restore China’s lawful seat was rejected with the “important question” draft, a trick played by the US and Japan, who required a two-third majority vote to restore China’s lawful seat. They proposed the draft mainly because the threshold of half of the votes could not stop China. In fact, even if the votes of a two-third majority were submitted, US supporters were decreasing year on year while its opponents were growing.
Once the “important question” draft was broken, a vote to restore China to its rightful seat only required a half majority vote. So once the final vote passed, the hall went wild. Our supporters cheered and applauded, most notably the Tanzanian delegate Salim Ahmed Salim, who once served as ambassador to China and was then Tanzania’s permanent representative to the UN. He had also been Tanzania’s foreign minister and later became prime minister. US media showed Salim jumping and dancing at the UN General Assembly.
I recently saw an interview where a reporter asked Salim what he thought of the Western media saying he was dancing. He said he never regretted that move at that time and he would dance again if he had the chance. He is a tough guy and our real friend.
In November 1971, the Chinese delegation including Qiao Guanhua (second from left) and Zhou Nan (middle) held talks with George H.W. Bush, then US representative in the UN.
GT: You mentioned that many people did not expect China to regain its lawful seat in the UN at that time. In retrospect, why did it happen in 1971?
Zhou: When Nixon left China he said that his seven-day visit had changed the world, but Chairman Mao said, not really, it was the world that had changed him. What had changed in the world at that time? How did Nixon and the UN change?
One of the changes is the great success of China’s “Two Bombs and One Satellite.”China’s comprehensive national strength had increased. And we had been supporting the national independence movement of African countries for many years, who were grateful to China. The other is that a US-led hegemony was unpopular. At that time, George Herbert Walker Bush was the representative of the United States in the UN. When he saw that the voting was not favorable to the US, he fidgeted in his seat, which left me with a deep impression.
As the international situation changed, so did the composition of the UN. In the 1950s, shortly after the UN was established, there were not many countries in the organization and the situation there was controlled by the US. Then African countries became independent and the UN added a large number of members. These new African brothers generally embraced us so it became increasingly difficult for the US to control the UN.
Changing the pattern actively
GT: What was the significance of China’s restoration of its lawful seat at the United Nations in 1971 and what impact did it have on the international situation at that time?
Zhou: Changes in the international situation prompted China to resume its seat in the UN, which in turn greatly increased the strength and morale of third world countries in the international stage. When we returned to the UN, we cooperated with the countries in the Non-Aligned Movement, the Group of 77, to vigorously advocate against hegemony, support national independence movements, and promote further changes in the world. Throughout the 1970s, the UN was in full bloom.
For some countries that were not independent at that time, we also supported them on issues such as anti-colonialism and anti-racism. At that time, the main heads of national movement parties, especially in non-independent African countries, came to the UN and approached us for support. We also supported them firmly in our speeches and votes.
The most important vote was the election of the UN Secretary General. The candidate we and other third world countries supported was Salim. The US had a grudge against him and also had their preferred Western candidate. The US vetoed us once we mentioned Salim, and we vetoed them when they recommended their candidate, forming a “veto war” on both sides.
At that time in the Security Council, a US counselor asked me, “For how long are you going to place a veto?” I replied that the day you veto Salim, we will veto you too. We will fight until the end, because our veto is for the third world and for the developing countries.
Later, some neutral countries tried to mediate and proposed Javier Pérez de Cuéllar from Peru as nominee for Secretary General, who was acceptable to representatives on both sides. The problem was finally resolved.
GT: What are some of the special events you remember from your 10 years at the UN ?
Zhou: When the delegation arrived in New York, we received overwhelming attention from the American public and the media. The slightest of things that happened in the delegation made the newspapers. They said the Chinese suits we wore were beautiful costumes and there were also American college students from all over the country who came to New York to deliver the Model United Nations performance at the Roosevelt Hotel where we were staying.
When I worked at the UN, we often encountered that proposals from developing countries were rejected in the Security Council, but they still put them to a vote in the UNGA, often with overwhelming majorities. Although UNGA resolutions are not binding, they are useful in generating public opinion which is why many developing countries use this approach.
When I first came to the UN, George H.W. Bush was the US Permanent Representative, followed by John Alfred Scali, and Daniel Patrick Moynihan. Once, a resolution opposed by the US in the Security Council was passed in the General Assembly. Moynihan became furious and said in public that it was the “tyranny of the majority.”
When the US had a majority of supporters at the UN, they said it was democracy and that the minority should obey the majority. Now that the US could not hold the majority, they said it was the tyranny of the majority. There were so many contradictions.
A more obvious example is the war in Iraq. The US was struggling to convince its allies in the Security Council to support it. Former US Secretary of State Colin Powell, who just passed away, went to the Security Council and said that investigations had revealed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and the UN should act. But France and other countries did not support it, so the US went it alone. Without the authorization of the Security Council, this war was itself illegal.
The US tries the use of the UN when it has the majority but takes a negative attitude when they cannot, delaying or refusing to pay its dues, and even choosing to withdraw. Former president Donald Trump withdrew the US from the UN Human Rights Council and after Biden came to power, he found that withdrawing was not a wise strategy. Biden rejoined the Council in order to make trouble from within.
GT: What is your expectation for future cooperation between China and the UN?
Zhou: The future still depends on further development of our national power to have more influence. Now China has become the main supporter of the UN, upholding the UN Charter, pursuing multilateralism and firmly upholding international peace and justice. The UN is also a great platform for us to promote the building of a community with a shared future for mankind. It is fair to say that our cooperation has a bright future.
Professor John V Walsh, MD in San Francisco: And China still provides that hope to the world. Without China, the US Empire would run roughshod over the world as it did between the period between the end of the Cold War (roughly 1987) and the rise of China (China’s PPP-GDP became number one in November, 2014, just 3 years after the US saw it coming and declared the Pivot in 2011.) Now, only 7 years after China became number one, the US has had to exit Afghanistan and it will withdraw further from MENA. And China provides the Global South with the opportunity (and hence the hope) for development. But each country has to do the hard work for itself. China can only provide a powerful partner – and it does not even claim to be a model. Instead each country must find its own way.
A Chinese satellite has used a manoeuvre to avoid being followed by a spying US satellite, hinting at its capability in potential space warfare.
Chinese satellite hints at space warfare prowess by dodging US surveillance
•Shijian 20, China’s most advanced communication satellite, was approached by US surveillance satellite but reportedly moved away at speed
•Monitoring rivals’ satellites is needed to avoid collisions, but the US is also concerned about Chinese satellites’ potential warfare capabilities
A Chinese satellite has used a manoeuvre to avoid being followed by a spying US satellite, hinting at its capability in potential space warfare.
But some defence analysts said the scenario was not new and the incident should not be seen as escalating the rivalry between China and the United States in space.
“It is not difficult to monitor satellites,” said Chinese military commentator Song Zhongping. “The US, Russia and China are all able to monitor each other’s satellites in orbit. But the US will certainly plan its space infrastructure through monitoring the satellites of China and Russia.”
Such monitoring and manoeuvring was not necessarily for a military purpose, he said.
In July, the Shijian 20, China’s heaviest and most advanced communication satellite, was approached in parallel by a US space surveillance satellite, USA 271. The Chinese satellite “rapidly” moved away, US military website Breaking Defence reported on Friday.
The Chinese detected the shadowing of the American satellite, the report said, citing information from space tracking company Commercial Space Operations Centre (ComSpOC).
“They start doing calibration manoeuvres and they’re very, very small manoeuvres, so it’s hard,” said Jim Cooper, the lead for space situational awareness at ComSpOC. “It’s about having the right system that can process and detect those small manoeuvres when you’re that close.”
The ComSpOC data also showed that in 2018, when another Chinese satellite, Tongxin Jishu Shiyan 3, took its position in geosynchronous orbit, the upper stage of the rocket that delivered the satellite had been loaded with extra fuel to enable it to stay parallel to it, to act as a decoy.
Cooper believed that was a tactic to fool an enemy’s network of space situational awareness, and to gain China several days of freedom during which it could “be off doing things that are potentially threatening” while the other country had lost track of where the Chinese satellite was.
Monitoring and manoeuvring the orbiting satellites is a necessity to avoid collisions, but the US has long been concerned about Chinese satellites’ capabilities in potential space warfare.
How China’s space programme went from launching satellites to building its own space station
How China’s space programme went from launching satellites to building its own space station
China has launched several satellites said to be “scavengers” that are fitted with robotic arms to grab and steer space debris so that it burns up in the Earth’s atmosphere.
But the Pentagon is concerned that the technology “could be used in a future system for grappling other satellites” and was therefore a concern to the US military, James Dickinson, commander of the US Space Command, told a Congress hearing in April.
A notable example, the Shijian 17, launched in 2016 with a robotic arm, had over the years made a number of “unusual manoeuvres” and varied its position in relation to other satellites while in geostationary orbit above the Earth, according to think tank the Centre for Strategic and International Studies.
Although the Chinese developers said the Shijian 17’s mission was to test “high-orbit space debris observation technologies”, Dickinson said it had the ability to potentially take down US probes in space.
Last week, the Shijian 21, China’s latest model for the “experimental validation of space debris mitigation technology” was delivered to its designated orbit.
A Chinese satellite has used a manoeuvre to avoid being followed by a spying US satellite, hinting at its capability in potential space warfare.
Like the terrorist groups funded and armed by US such as ISIS, al qaeda, taliban, dalai lama and etc! Hell No!
Video: “I used to work for the religious cult Falun Gong” “我曾經為邪教法輪功工作過”
For anyone who’s been paying attention to the new cold war, you may have noticed that YouTube often boosts anti-China networks like New Tang Dynasty which is the media arm of the Falun Gong. This YouTuber once worked for the Falun Gong’s musical, Shen Yun, and he exposes the whole cult in this talk. 對於一直關注新冷戰的人來說，你可能已經註意到YouTube經常宣傳反華網絡，比如法輪功的媒體機構新唐朝。 這位YouTuber曾經為法輪功的音樂劇神韻工作，他在這次演講中揭露了整個邪教。
https://vimeo.com/641245911
https://youtu.be/hizCacoX_2g
https://www.facebook.com/100036400039778/posts/596218364934826/?d=n
SCMP: World’s advanced economies still look with envy at US’s military strength, technological prowess, universities and its entertainment – but much less so at the most famous US export of all: democracy, fake democracy. 香港南華早報: 世界發達經濟體仍然羨慕美國的軍事實力、技術實力、大學及其娛樂活動 – 但更不用說美國最著名的出口產品：民主、虛假民主 並不感興趣.
Xi Jinping Continues to Attend the 16th G20 Leaders’ Summit
On the evening of October 31, 2021, President Xi Jinping continued to attend the 16th G20 Leaders’ Summit in Beijing via video link, and he mainly elaborated views on issues such as climate change, energy, and sustainable development.
Xi Jinping pointed out, climate change and energy issues are present prominent global challenges that concern the common interests of the international community and bear on the future of the Earth. The willingness and motivation of the international community to jointly cope with challenges continue to rise, and the key is to take concrete actions. First, we should adopt comprehensive and balanced policies. We must balance environmental protection and economic development, address climate change and safeguard people’s livelihood. Major economies should strengthen cooperation in this regard. Second, we should fully and effectively implement the United Nations (UN) Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Paris Agreement. We should uphold the role of the UN as the main channel, follow the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, abide by international law, focus on effective actions, take stronger actions and enhance cooperation. Third, we must increase support for developing countries. The G20 members should take the lead in promoting and applying advanced technologies, and developed countries should also earnestly fulfill their commitments to providing funds for developing countries.
Xi Jinping emphasized, in the past 15 years, the cut of China’s carbon emission intensity has greatly exceeded the climate action goals of 2020. China will successively release implementation plans and supporting measures for major areas and industries to achieve carbon peaking, and establish the “1+N” policy framework for carbon peak and carbon neutrality. China will further transform and upgrade energy and industrial structures, promote research, development and application of green and low-carbon technologies, support qualified places, industries, and enterprises to take the lead in reaching the peak, and contribute to addressing climate change and promoting the energy transformation.
Xi Jinping said, at present, the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic has triggered multiple crises. The development achievements made by the international community over the years have been seriously eroded and developing countries are facing unprecedented challenges and tests. The COVID-19 pandemic has once again shown that all countries enjoy a shared future and intertwined interests, and form a community with a shared future for mankind. Promoting sustainable development in developing countries will benefit the people of the countries concerned, and also affect the future and destiny of the whole mankind and the Earth.
Xi Jinping emphasized, China recently has launched the Global Development Initiative and called on the international community to accelerate the implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and promote a more robust, greener and more balanced global development. The G20 should build consensus and step up actions in this regard.
First, give priority to development and act on the people-centered philosophy. All parties should take the betterment of people’s well-being and realization of people’s well-rounded development as the starting point and ultimate goal, place development cooperation in a more prominent position in global macro-policy coordination and the G20 agenda, and strive to address problems such as poverty and imbalanced development.
Second, stick to being action-oriented and promote practical cooperation. All sides should increase input in development, attach importance to the needs of developing countries, and strengthen cooperation in critical areas such as poverty reduction, food security, industrialization and connectivity. China hosted the International Conference on Food Loss and Waste in September this year. China stands ready to contribute more Chinese wisdom and solutions through the G20 platform.
Third, pursue mutual benefit and build partnerships. All sides should support the UN in playing a coordinating role, deepen global partnership for development, and build a global community of development with a shared future. Developed countries should earnestly honor their development assistance commitments and provide more resources for developing countries. The Global Development Initiative proposed by China will further synergize with the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and jointly advance global development.
The G20 Rome Leaders’ Declaration was adopted at the Summit.
Ding Xuexiang, Liu He, Yang Jiechi and others attended the activity.
Wang Yi attended the Summit in Italy as President Xi Jinping’s special representative.
Johnson Choi Biz