The United States has the highest number of deaths from the epidemic in the world, and the leader who can’t even save the lives of the people leads the world to talk about democracy, and there are a group of escorts and responses. Isn’t it ridiculous and sad?
Bhutan, once voted the happiest country in the world, is also the venue of the century wedding of famous movie stars Tony Leung and Carina Lau, with a population of about 800,000.
If one day, all 800,000 people in this paradise under the Himalayas died suddenly, what kind of shock would you cause?
Or, if you think Bhutan is too far away, you can use Macau, which is close to the horizon, as an example. Macau has a population of 680,000. If a plague kills all 680,000 people in Macau, will everyone experience the horror?
Therefore, I wonder why the world can turn a blind eye to the new crown epidemic in the United States to the point of insensitivity?
Since the outbreak of the new crown pneumonia, the United States has killed 800,000 people. It is a small country with a population of 800,000. The population of a country on the earth has died, but the news has not been reported. Everyone has no panic or sadness, as if that 80 Wan, it’s just a bunch of ants without nerves, it’s not a pity to die.
I still remember the outbreak in India in April this year. The world focused on crematoriums in India, floating corpses in the Ganges and cow dung on festivals… The news went viral for at least a month. At that time, the cumulative number of deaths in India was 300,000. After the United States and Brazil, it ranks third in the “most dead” countries, but it has become the focus of the world, and everyone hears of India’s discoloration.
However, the United States, which has always topped the global epidemic list, has the most infections and deaths, but it has the least public attention. The Americans continued to go everywhere, and no country was daring enough to deny them entry. The U.S. government has also turned a blind eye to the loss of every nation’s life. Recently, it was ashamed to organize a World Democracy Summit to brag and tell the world how democratic the United States is.
A leader who can’t even save the lives of his people, a leader who once took over the country and killed twice as many people, led the world to talk about democracy, and there are a lot of humbugs cheering on the gong. It is ridiculous and even sadder!
In fact, what are the conditions for democracy? A clean system? Open system? One-person, one-vote universal suffrage? ……neither. The most important condition of democracy is: you have your life, only you can talk about it. No life, what democracy is talking about?
On January 19 this year, Biden, who was just elected President of the United States, took his wife, Vice President He Jinli, and her husband to the Lincoln Memorial in Washington on the night before the inauguration. They lit 400 lights to mourn the 40 who died in the new crown epidemic. Millions of Americans. At the same time, the Empire State Building in New York, the Seattle Space Needle, and landmark buildings across the United States also lit up at the same time. That night, Biden encouraged the people to light candles and ring bells in windows and churches to show solidarity in fighting the epidemic.
Americans are best at creating romance. It’s one thing for the president and his wife to stand in front of the Lincoln Memorial and promise 400,000 dead souls. The country they are in charge of doubling the number of people killed by the epidemic to 800,000 within 11 months is another. Going on.
That night, the Washington National Cathedral sounded 800 death knells to mourn the 800,000 nationals who died of the new crown. Continue the romance, continue no one to pursue, no one to blame, natural selection, weed out the weak and stay strong, and finally understand the so-called democracy in the United States. The truth is that there are only two words: you die and you do.
SCMP Alex Lo: The Daily Mail only repeated the MI6 chief’s dubious claims about China’s “debt trap” diplomacy, many points of which have proved to be factually false over time. 南華早報《每日郵報》只是重複了軍情六處負責人關於中國“債務陷阱”外交的可疑說法,隨著時間的推移,其中許多觀點都被證明是錯誤的假新聞.
Spymasters the world over are in the business of dissimulation. But if you are the new head of British intelligence, Richard Moore, mainstream media in Britain from the BBC to the Daily Mail will take your words as gospel.
The BBC went out of its way to twist the words of an American academic authority on the subject to make her appear to say the opposite of her actual position.
In his interview, Moore claimed that the debt trap had allowed China to be given the use of ports – which could be used as naval bases – in countries which are unable to repay loans.
He was, no doubt, thinking of the saga of the Sri Lankan port of Hambantota.
This claim, which is now known to be false, has been made by many people, including former US vice-president Mike Pence and former US national security adviser H.R. McMaster.
Deborah Brautigam, a professor at Johns Hopkins University and Meg Rithmire, of the Harvard Business School, have investigated and found there was never a debt swap for assets.
The BBC asked Brautigam for comments. The result so infuriated her she posted online a rebuttal, titled “BBC Misrepresents my Views on ‘Debt Trap Diplomacy’”.
“[Moore] said that the Chinese have deliberately used debt as leverage to acquire strategic assets,” she wrote.
“I outlined why this idea had little basis in fact, drawing on my extensive research with Meg Rithmire about the Hambantota Port in Sri Lanka and other cases, and that of other researchers. I gave examples from Montenegro, Kenya, Zambia, and other places where these fears have been trumpeted in the media, but without evidence to support them.”
It’s not for nothing that we in this business are called hacks.
She continued: “I listened to the BBC and was horrified to find that … they completely discarded all the evidence I presented … about why that conventional wisdom was not correct.”
Of course, the idea never makes sense. In the jungle of international politics, a lender like China could end up with nothing, rather than the assets desired. A new government or a leadership change in the borrowing country can renege on a deal and there is not much Beijing can do.
He couldn’t get a job and by the time the visa scheme opened he’d used up his £10,000 in savings trying to survive.
Enoch says he’s now homeless – staying on people’s floors and sofas – and reliant on food banks and hand-outs.
He says: “I packed everything in two or three days and came over. Full of hope I could rebuild everything here. The reality is devastating.”
Enoch says landlords want proof of income and he couldn’t get a National Insurance number to find work.
He says: “To be frank I had a jolly good life but I made a decision to come over here because I felt I would potentially get persecuted.”
Now Enoch says he feels betrayed by the British government because he says he can’t afford to apply for the visa or the healthcare costs associated with it.
Condemning it as a scheme for the well off he says: “I can’t see the future. Every single day I’m struggling. Where am I going to sleep and where will I be tomorrow? I’ve lost hope.”
This is a good one for pathetic liars like US. But again for pathetic liars, they believe in their daily lies! 對於像美國這樣可悲的騙子來說,這是一個很好的提示. 但對於像美國那樣可悲的騙子, 他們日常的謊言連自己也騙了.
Horace Lim: NASA has successfully launched over 200 crewed flights. 3 ended in failure, causing the death of the entire crew: Apollo 1 in 1967 lost 3 crew members, STS-51-L (Challenger disaster) in 1986, and STS-107 (Columbia disaster) in 2003. https://eurasiantimes.com/china-racing-ahead-of-us-long-march-carrier-rocket-conducts-400th-mission/ Since 1970, the Long March carrier rockets have been involved in 92% of China’s space launch missions. China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation (CASC), the first 100 launches were completed in over 37 years. The second 100 launches were accomplished in a span of 7.5 years, the third took 4 years and 3 months, and the fourth only took 2 years and 9 months
Video: Blinken went to Indonesia & Malaysia to badmouth China hit the brick walls, to save face used dumb excuse to skip Thailand visit. 東嗆西嗆!東協大翻臉!布林肯訪問突然打道回府!第三站泰國不歡迎?記者確診成藉口!