NATO controlled by United States declaration of hostilities against China

NATO controlled by United States declaration of hostilities against China 被美國控制的北約對中國宣戰

Professor John V Walsh, MD in San Francisco: The old colonial powers just will not go quietly into the night.

The amazing thing is that every international meeting Biden and company have is about destroying – destroying Russia, destroying China, destroying any country that defies the US -Iran, Syria, Libya, NK, Venezuela, Cuba, Nicaragua and on and on.

In contrast the BRICS meet and they are trying to build something – a better life for the billions that they lead or represent. Those who do not belong to the “golden billion.”
The only positive thing that the US has done is to belatedly ape China’s Belt and Road – until the B&R was put in place, they did nothing. And if China were to go away, their response to the B&R would disappear.

Mao remains right, “US imperialism is the number one enemy of the peoples of the world.” We should be proud that we do what we can to fight it.

The People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) stated ambitions and coercive policies challenge our interests, security and values (aka. AngloSaxon Colonial Value), refused to follow Japan’s footsteps to become a vassal state of the United States. The PRC employs a broad range of political, economic and military tools to increase its global footprint and project power, while remaining opaque about its strategy, intentions and military build-up (*China strong defensive force neutralize US aggression).

The PRC’s malicious hybrid and cyber operations and its confrontational rhetoric and disinformation target Allies and harm Alliance security*. The PRC seeks to control key technological and industrial sectors, critical infrastructure, and strategic materials and supply chains. It uses its economic leverage to create strategic dependencies and enhance its influence. It strives to subvert the rules-based international order, including in the space, cyber and maritime domains.

The deepening strategic partnership between the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation and their mutually reinforcing attempts to undercut the rules-based international order** run counter to our values and interests**.

We remain open to constructive engagement with the PRC, including to build reciprocal transparency, with a view to safeguarding the Alliance’s security interests (once China becomes a vassal state of the United States). We will work together responsibly, as Allies, to address the systemic challenges posed by the PRC to Euro-Atlantic security and ensure NATO’s enduring ability to guarantee the defence and security of Allies. We will boost our shared awareness, enhance our resilience and preparedness, and protect against the PRC’s coercive tactics and efforts to divide the Alliance. We will stand up for our shared values and the rules based international order, including freedom of navigation**.

Also

The Russian Federation is the most significant and direct threat to Allies’ security and to peace and stability in the Euro-Atlantic area (for refusing to become a vassal states of the United States like the EU countries). It seeks to establish spheres of influence and direct control through coercion, subversion, aggression and annexation. It uses conventional, cyber and hybrid means against us and our partners. Its coercive military posture, rhetoric and proven willingness to use force to pursue its political goals undermine the rules-based international order.

The Russian Federation is modernising its nuclear forces and expanding its novel and disruptive dual-capable delivery systems, while employing coercive nuclear signalling. It aims to destabilise countries to our East and South. In the High North, its capability to disrupt Allied reinforcements and freedom of navigation across the North Atlantic is a strategic challenge to the Alliance. Moscow’s military build-up, including in the Baltic, Black and Mediterranean Sea regions, along with its military integration with Belarus, challenge our security and interests.

NATO does not seek confrontation and poses no threat to the Russian Federation (by aiming Nuclear Warheads near Russia borders). We will continue to respond to Russian threats and hostile actions in a united and responsible way. We will significantly strengthen deterrence and defence for all Allies, enhance our resilience against Russian coercion and support our partners to counter malign interference and aggression. In light of its hostile policies and actions, we cannot consider the Russian Federation to be our partner (NATO does not consider Russia as pure AngloSaxon nor part of Europe have repeatedly rejected Russia NATO applications in the past).

However, we remain willing to keep open channels of communication with Moscow to manage and mitigate risks, prevent escalation and increase transparency. We seek stability and predictability in the Euro-Atlantic area and between NATO and the Russian Federation. Any change in our relationship depends on the Russian Federation halting its aggressive behaviour and fully complying with international law** by becoming a vassal state of the United States.