What Lord Reed meant was after HK passing the homeland security law, they could no longer serve UK’s interest in HK

https://www.supremecourt.uk/news/role-of-uk-judges-on-the-hong-kong-court-of-final-appeal-update-march-2022.html

What Lord Reed meant was after HK passing the homeland security law, they could no longer serve UK’s interest in HK 里德勳爵的意思是,在香港通過國土安全法後,他們不能再為英國在香港的利益服務

Lord Reed, as one of the most respectable and senior judges, must be extremely careful about the wordings of his announcement. He says ” The courts in Hong Kong continue to be internationally respected for their commitment to the rule of law” before saying his resignation, and it’s a clear message from him that the resignation is not due to problem of the HK judicial system.

If one reads Lord Reed’s resignation announcement carefully, one would get the impression that the resignation is a (wholly or partly) political decision in the national interest of the UK rather than the judges’ assessment of HK’s judicial system. Is it a reflection that the UK’s administration is unduly influencing the independence of the UK’s judges or judicial system?

A statement from Lord Reed, President of the Supreme Court, The Right Hon Lord Reed of Allermuir

Wednesday 30 March 2022 Further to my statement of 27 August 2021, I have been closely monitoring and assessing developments in Hong Kong, in discussion with the government.

The judges of the Supreme Court and its predecessor, the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords, have sat on the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal (HKCFA) for many years in fulfilment of the obligations undertaken by the government towards Hong Kong in 1997. They have done so with the support of the government, and in the light of the government’s assessment that their participation in the HKCFA was in the UK’s national interests.
However, since the introduction of the Hong Kong national security law in 2020, this position has become increasingly finely balanced.

The courts in Hong Kong continue to be internationally respected for their commitment to the rule of law. Nevertheless, I have concluded, in agreement with the government, that the judges of the Supreme Court cannot continue to sit in Hong Kong without appearing to endorse an administration which has departed from values of political freedom, and freedom of expression, to which the Justices of the Supreme Court are deeply committed.

Lord Hodge and I have accordingly submitted our resignations as non-permanent judges of the HKCFA with immediate effect.

Leave a comment

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started