Notice how low the standards are to be published when you China-bash in the racist America. Judge Lillian Sing and Roland Duhn in San Francisco got their opinion pieces published. 請注意，當您在種族主義的美國進行中國抨擊時，發布的標準是多麼低。
Matt, the opinions editor of San Francisco Chronicle Newspaper said, we want personal narrative, combined with facts, with local relevance. Craft it carefully, clearly, and respectfully, make it sweet, comforting, and succinctly, like condensed milk, and maybe you will get published.
On the other hand, any unsubstantiated China-bashing claim–thoughtless, racist verbal graffiti–gets published immediately and indiscriminately.
That’s the double standard.
If there is espionage, where are the convictions for espionage?
Of course there are none, because these racists claim “a thousand grains of sand” strategy–essentially tarring everyone. This is why Harry’s article was so lacking, and why Russell Jeung is out to lunch (because “selective targeting” is meaningless when you presume Asian students and researchers are guilty).
If it’s espionage, why is China’s technology is more advanced in many areas?
Why is China beating the US hands down in patents filed (whose specificity of documentation would be a windfall for any prosecutor)?
Why is the US spying on Chinese technology?
This is just more racist stereotyping, essentially claiming that the Chinese (actually all foreigners and indigenous) are thieves, cheaters, and of course, incapable of creativity.
Johnson Choi Biz 